| Literature DB >> 36082294 |
Parul Chaudhary1, Shivani Singh1, Anuj Chaudhary2, Anita Sharma1, Govind Kumar3.
Abstract
With the increase in world population, the demography of humans is estimated to be exceeded and it has become a major challenge to provide an adequate amount of food, feed, and agricultural products majorly in developing countries. The use of chemical fertilizers causes the plant to grow efficiently and rapidly to meet the food demand. The drawbacks of using a higher quantity of chemical or synthetic fertilizers are environmental pollution, persistent changes in the soil ecology, physiochemical composition, decreasing agricultural productivity and cause several health hazards. Climatic factors are responsible for enhancing abiotic stress on crops, resulting in reduced agricultural productivity. There are various types of abiotic and biotic stress factors like soil salinity, drought, wind, improper temperature, heavy metals, waterlogging, and different weeds and phytopathogens like bacteria, viruses, fungi, and nematodes which attack plants, reducing crop productivity and quality. There is a shift toward the use of biofertilizers due to all these facts, which provide nutrition through natural processes like zinc, potassium and phosphorus solubilization, nitrogen fixation, production of hormones, siderophore, various hydrolytic enzymes and protect the plant from different plant pathogens and stress conditions. They provide the nutrition in adequate amount that is sufficient for healthy crop development to fulfill the demand of the increasing population worldwide, eco-friendly and economically convenient. This review will focus on biofertilizers and their mechanisms of action, role in crop productivity and in biotic/abiotic stress tolerance.Entities:
Keywords: abiotic stress; biofertilizers; biotic stress; crop productivity; plant-root interaction
Year: 2022 PMID: 36082294 PMCID: PMC9445558 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.930340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Types of biofertilizers on the basis of microorganism and functional characteristics.
Role of biofertilizers in biotic stress tolerance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Inhibit growth of pathogen and promote plant growth | You et al., | |
|
|
|
| Regulates signaling pathway such as JA and MAPK | Nie et al., |
|
|
|
| Protects host plant from pathogen | Rashid et al., |
|
|
|
| Enhanced the chitinase, hydrolytic, protease production and protects plants from pathogen | Hassan et al., |
|
|
|
| Protects plants from pathogen | Mishra and Arora, |
|
|
|
| Protects from pathogen and activates defense response in plants | Rodriguez et al., |
|
|
| Provides immunity to plants and protect from disease | Hata et al., | |
|
|
| Increased production of volatile fatty acids and antibiotics | Rybakova et al., | |
|
|
|
| Increased expression of auxin-related genes and improved plant growth | Samaras et al., |
|
|
|
| Enhanced proline content and pathogen-related enzymes and inhibit the growth of pathogens | Taha et al., |
|
| Olive trees |
| Increased production of volatile fatty acids and improves seed germination | Sdiri et al., |
|
|
|
| Provides protection to plants from pathogen | Yu et al., |
|
|
| Viruses | Induced SA and JA signaling and protects plants from disease | Beris et al., |
|
|
|
| Increased secondary metabolite, phytohormone production and improved plant growth | Kousar et al., |
|
|
|
| Increased plant growth and suppress the growth of pathogens | Sundaramoorthy and Balabaskar, |
|
|
| Inhibit growth of pathogens | Kumar et al., | |
|
| Inhibit pathogens | Zain et al., | ||
|
|
| Improved plant growth and increased chitinase, siderophore, and IAA production | Sendi et al., | |
|
|
|
| Increased production of HCN against pathogens | Anand et al., |
|
|
|
| Increased production of volatile organic acids and inhibit pathogen growth | Don et al., |
Figure 2Role of biofertilizers for maintenance of crop productivity and soil health.
Role of biofertilizers in abiotic stress tolerance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Salinity, heavy metals | Improved salt tolerance ability | Sultana et al., |
|
|
| Salt | Improved plant growth | Liu et al., |
|
|
| Salt | Improved salt tolerance ability in stressed plants | Zhou et al., |
|
|
| Salt | Increased weight of roots and shoots | Mukhtar et al., |
|
| Salt | Increase chlorophyll content and protects plants from stress | Mokabel et al., | |
|
| Salt | Improved plant growth and photosynthesis | Gupta et al., | |
|
|
| Drought and nitrogen | Increase plant biomass and chlorophyll content | Tufail et al., |
|
|
| Salt | Improved plant health parameters | Yasmin et al., |
|
|
| Drought | Improved photosynthesis | Qiang et al., |
|
|
| Salt | Increased antioxidant enzyme activity and chlorophyll content | Asaf et al., |
|
|
| Heat | Improved plant height, biomass, and chlorophyll content | Ismail et al., |
|
|
| Drought | Improved phenols, terpenoids and soil protein and enzyme activities | Cheng et al., |
|
|
| Salt | Improved shoot weight and growth | Meddich et al., |
|
|
| Nutrient | Improved Zn uptake and root and shoot biomass | Abadi et al., |
|
|
| Cold | Increased proline content and cold stress tolerance genes | Jiang et al., |
|
|
| Cold | Improved auxin production and cold-related gene expression | González-Pérez et al., |
|
| C3 plants | Salt | Improved chlorophyll content in plants | Chandrasekaran et al., |
|
| Drought | Increased yield and protects from stress | Sheteiwy et al., | |
|
| Drought | Improved plant health and microbial diversity in soil Triggered CAT, proline, and IAA production | Igiehon et al., |