Literature DB >> 32730571

Beef trait genetic parameters based on old and recent data and its implications for genomic predictions in Italian Simmental cattle.

Alberto Cesarani1,2, Jorge Hidalgo1, Andre Garcia1, Lorenzo Degano2, Daniele Vicario2, Yutaka Masuda1, Ignacy Misztal1, Daniela Lourenco1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the changes in variance components over time to identify a subset of data from the Italian Simmental (IS) population that would yield the most appropriate estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values for beef traits to select young bulls. Data from bulls raised between 1986 and 2017 were used to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values for four beef traits (average daily gain [ADG], body size [BS], muscularity [MUS], and feet and legs [FL]). The phenotypic mean increased during the years of the study for ADG, but it decreased for BS, MUS, and FL. The complete dataset (ALL) was divided into four generational subsets (Gen1, Gen2, Gen3, and Gen4). Additionally, ALL was divided into two larger subsets: the first one (OLD) combined data from Gen1 and Gen2 to represent the starting population, and the second one (CUR) combined data from Gen3 and Gen4 to represent a subpopulation with stronger ties to the current population. Genetic parameters were estimated with a four-trait genomic animal model using a single-step genomic average information restricted maximum likelihood algorithm. Heritability estimates from ALL were 0.26 ± 0.03 for ADG, 0.33 ± 0.04 for BS, 0.55 ± 0.03 for MUS, and 0.23 ± 0.03 for FL. Higher heritability estimates were obtained with OLD and ALL than with CUR. Considerable changes in heritability existed between Gen1 and Gen4 due to fluctuations in both additive genetic and residual variances. Genetic correlations also changed over time, with some values moving from positive to negative or even to zero. Genetic correlations from OLD were stronger than those from CUR. Changes in genetic parameters over time indicated that they should be updated regularly to avoid biases in genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) and low selection accuracies. GEBV estimated using CUR variance components were less biased and more consistent than those estimated with OLD and ALL variance components. Validation results indicated that data from recent generations produced genetic parameters that more appropriately represent the structure of the current population, yielding accurate GEBV to select young animals and increasing the likelihood of higher genetic gains.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; genetic correlation; genomic; single-step approach; variance components

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32730571      PMCID: PMC7431209          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  25 in total

1.  Selection under negative linkage disequilibrium. Random mating versus inbreeding.

Authors:  L Silvela; I D de la Peña; R Gomez-Ruano
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic correlations among production, body size, udder, and productive life traits over time in Holsteins.

Authors:  S Tsuruta; I Misztal; T J Lawlor
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Effect of selection on genetic parameters of correlated traits.

Authors:  B Villanueva; B W Kennedy
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Genomic and pedigree-based genetic parameters for scarcely recorded traits when some animals are genotyped.

Authors:  R F Veerkamp; H A Mulder; R Thompson; M P L Calus
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Accuracies of estimated breeding values from ordinary genetic evaluations do not reflect the correlation between true and estimated breeding values in selected populations.

Authors:  P Bijma
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Variance components using genomic information for 2 functional traits in Italian Simmental cattle: Calving interval and lactation persistency.

Authors:  Alberto Cesarani; Giustino Gaspa; Yutaka Masuda; Lorenzo Degano; Daniele Vicario; Daniela A L Lourenco; Nicolò P P Macciotta
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Genetic correlations between reproduction and production traits in swine.

Authors:  B Holm; M Bakken; G Klemetsdal; O Vangen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.

Authors:  S Tsuruta; D A L Lourenco; Y Masuda; I Misztal; T J Lawlor
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations.

Authors:  Gregor Gorjanc; Piter Bijma; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using SNP arrays based on different marker densities in Nellore cattle using the ssGBLUP.

Authors:  Juan Diego Rodriguez Neira; Elisa Peripolli; Maria Paula Marinho de Negreiros; Rafael Espigolan; Rodrigo López-Correa; Ignacio Aguilar; Raysildo B Lobo; Fernando Baldi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Bovine host genome acts on rumen microbiome function linked to methane emissions.

Authors:  Marina Martínez-Álvaro; Marc D Auffret; Carol-Anne Duthie; Richard J Dewhurst; Matthew A Cleveland; Mick Watson; Rainer Roehe
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-04-12

3.  Random Regression Model for Genetic Evaluation and Early Selection in the Iranian Holstein Population.

Authors:  Yasamin Salimiyekta; Rasoul Vaez-Torshizi; Mokhtar Ali Abbasi; Nasser Emmamjome-Kashan; Mehdi Amin-Afshar; Xiangyu Guo; Just Jensen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.