Literature DB >> 35133621

Prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using SNP arrays based on different marker densities in Nellore cattle using the ssGBLUP.

Juan Diego Rodriguez Neira1, Elisa Peripolli2, Maria Paula Marinho de Negreiros3, Rafael Espigolan3, Rodrigo López-Correa4, Ignacio Aguilar5, Raysildo B Lobo6, Fernando Baldi2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using different low-density customized SNP arrays selected by informativeness and distribution of markers across the genome employing single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Phenotypic records for adjusted weight at 210 and 450 days of age were utilized. A total of 945 animals were genotyped with high-density chip, and 267 individuals born after 2008 were selected as validation population. We evaluated 11 scenarios using five customized density arrays (40 k, 20 k, 10 k, 5 k and 2 k) and the HD array was used as desirable scenario. The GEBV predictions and BIF (Beef Improvement Federation) accuracy were obtained with BLUPF90 family programs. Linear regression was used to evaluate the prediction ability, inflation, and bias of GEBV of each customized array. An overestimation of partial GEBVs in contrast with complete GEBVs and increase of BIF accuracy with the density arrays diminished were observed. For all traits, the prediction ability was higher as the array density increased and it was similar with customized arrays higher than 10 k SNPs. Level of inflation was lower as the density array increased of and was higher for MW210 effect. The bias was susceptible to overestimation of GEBVs when the density customized arrays decreased. These results revealed that the BIF accuracy is sensible to overestimation using low-density customized arrays while the prediction ability with least 10,000 informative SNPs obtained from the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip shows accurate and less biased predictions. Low-density customized arrays under ssGBLUP method could be feasible and cost-effective in genomic selection.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Institute of Plant Genetics Polish Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Beef cattle; Genomic selection; Inflation; Minor allele frequency; SNP arrays

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35133621     DOI: 10.1007/s13353-022-00685-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  41 in total

1.  Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.

Authors:  M Erbe; B J Hayes; L K Matukumalli; S Goswami; P J Bowman; C M Reich; B A Mason; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.

Authors:  H Gao; P Madsen; U S Nielsen; G P Aamand; G Su; K Byskov; J Jensen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.

Authors:  I Aguilar; I Misztal; D L Johnson; A Legarra; S Tsuruta; T J Lawlor
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale.

Authors:  C Y Chen; I Misztal; I Aguilar; A Legarra; W M Muir
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Beef trait genetic parameters based on old and recent data and its implications for genomic predictions in Italian Simmental cattle.

Authors:  Alberto Cesarani; Jorge Hidalgo; Andre Garcia; Lorenzo Degano; Daniele Vicario; Yutaka Masuda; Ignacy Misztal; Daniela Lourenco
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.

Authors:  Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia; Elisa Peripolli; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; Fabiele Loise Braga Feitosa; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Mariana Piatto Berton; Bianca Ferreira Olivieri; Rafael Espigolan; Rafael Lara Tonussi; Daniel Gustavo Mansan Gordo; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Adrielle Mathias Ferrinho; Lenise Freitas Mueller; Sabrina Kluska; Humberto Tonhati; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; Ignacio Aguilar; Fernando Baldi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Design of a bovine low-density SNP array optimized for imputation.

Authors:  Didier Boichard; Hoyoung Chung; Romain Dassonneville; Xavier David; André Eggen; Sébastien Fritz; Kimberly J Gietzen; Ben J Hayes; Cynthia T Lawley; Tad S Sonstegard; Curtis P Van Tassell; Paul M VanRaden; Karine A Viaud-Martinez; George R Wiggans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  Selma Forni; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genome-wide scan reveals population stratification and footprints of recent selection in Nelore cattle.

Authors:  Diercles F Cardoso; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Christian Reimer; Saber Qanbari; Malena Erbe; André V do Nascimento; Guilherme C Venturini; Daiane C Becker Scalez; Fernando Baldi; Gregório M Ferreira de Camargo; Maria E Zerlotti Mercadante; Joslaine N do Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Henner Simianer; Humberto Tonhati
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.