The DEAD-box RNA helicase CshA is required for fatty acid homeostasis in Staphylococcus aureus.

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen that can grow in a wide array of conditions: on abiotic surfaces, on the skin, in the nose, in planktonic or biofilm forms and can cause many type of infections. Consequently, S. aureus must be able to adapt rapidly to these changing growth conditions, an ability largely driven at the posttranscriptional level. RNA helicases of the DEAD-box family play an important part in this process. In particular, CshA, which is part of the degradosome, is required for the rapid turnover of certain mRNAs and its deletion results in cold-sensitivity. To understand the molecular basis of this phenotype, we conducted a large genetic screen isolating 82 independent suppressors of cold growth. Full genome sequencing revealed the fatty acid synthesis pathway affected in many suppressor strains. Consistent with that result, sublethal doses of triclosan, a FASII inhibitor, can partially restore growth of a cshA mutant in the cold. Overexpression of the genes involved in branched-chain fatty acid synthesis was also able to suppress the cold-sensitivity. Using gas chromatography analysis of fatty acids, we observed an imbalance of straight and branched-chain fatty acids in the cshA mutant, compared to the wild-type. This imbalance is compensated in the suppressor strains. Thus, we reveal for the first time that the cold sensitive growth phenotype of a DEAD-box mutant can be explained, at least partially, by an improper membrane composition. The defect correlates with an accumulation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex mRNA, which is inefficiently degraded in absence of CshA. We propose that the resulting accumulation of acetyl-CoA fuels straight-chained fatty acid production at the expense of the branched ones. Strikingly, addition of acetate into the medium mimics the cshA deletion phenotype, resulting in cold sensitivity suppressed by the mutations found in our genetic screen or by sublethal doses of triclosan.

Introduction

Adaptation to different environments requires a sophisticated and complex gene expression system, allowing bacteria to quickly regulate mRNA abundance and thereby protein synthesis. Among the players involved in regulation of gene expression are DEAD-box RNA helicases, which are ubiquitous proteins found in all organisms [1,2]. DEAD-box RNA helicases display RNA-dependent ATPase and ATP-dependent RNA helicase activities that generally mediate local unwinding of an RNA duplex but can also achieve other molecular functions such as annealing, protein displacement, or clamping on RNA. Thus DEAD-box helicases act at various RNA remodeling steps that may be crucial for gene expression or ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) assembly. In bacteria the functions established for DEAD-box RNA helicases are limited to translation initiation, ribosome biogenesis and RNA decay [1]. Staphylococcus aureus encodes two DEAD-box RNA helicases, CshA and CshB. In Bacillus subtilis, the two homologues have been proposed to be involved in ribosome biogenesis, however their functions in this process have not been detailed [3]. The discovery, in both B. subtilis and S. aureus, that CshA interacts with exoribonucleases such as RNase Y, RNase J1/J2 or PNPase that were proposed to form a degradosome, suggests that it is involved in mRNA turnover [4-6]. In S. aureus inactivation of cshA was first described in a screen aimed to find mutations that affect biofilm formation [7]. We later showed that this defect correlates with the requirement of CshA to efficiently degrade the agr mRNA that encodes the major quorum sensing system of S. aureus, governing many virulence factors [8]. Global scale mRNA half-life measurements showed that absence of CshA slightly increases the stability of the bulk mRNA and more significantly a subset of about hundred genes, corroborating a general function of CshA in mRNA decay [9]. In addition to these functions, an RNA protective role of CshA has also been proposed where the helicase protects some mRNAs upon MazE toxin induction [10], but this has not been studied further. Altogether these data suggest that the CshA DEAD-box RNA helicase might have various functions in RNA metabolism.

Inactivation of cshA also leads to a cold sensitive phenotype with a marked growth delay at 25°C. Cold sensitivity is a common phenotype shared by inactivation of various RNA helicases. It is believed that, as temperature is reduced, the stronger stability of RNA duplexes increases the dependency on RNA helicase. Inactivation of CshB, the second DEAD-box protein of S. aureus also altered cold–growth. This phenotype has been related to a magnesium homeostasis defect, although the molecular details have not been worked out [11]. In E. coli, the cold sensitivity of csdA and srmB mutants have been related to defects in ribosome biogenesis [12,13].

In order to understand the reason of the cold sensitivity in absence of CshA, we performed a large genetic screen selecting spontaneous suppressors that improve the growth of the helicase mutant strain at 25°C. The identification of various mutants affecting the fatty acid biosynthesis system (FASII) clearly identified membrane biosynthesis as one of the impaired pathways. Changes of the fatty acids composition is known as a major mechanism in response to low temperature in order to counteract rigidification of the membrane by introducing lower melting-point molecules [14,15]. In Gram-negative bacteria this is achieved by increasing the synthesis of unsaturated fatty acid (UFA). Membranes of Gram-positive bacteria are majorly composed of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) and straight-chain fatty acids (SCFA). Response to low temperature in these organisms relies essentially on the increase of BCFA production associated with a decrease in chain length by an undefined mechanism [16]. Here we show that this cold-induced response is impeded in the ΔcshA strain explaining at least in part its cold sensitivity. Thus our data link for the first time the cold sensitivity of a DEAD-box RNA helicase mutant to a membrane biosynthesis defect. Deeper molecular analysis allowed us to propose that the inability of the mutant to increase BCFA content is due to the requirement of CshA for the degradation of the mRNA of the pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) operon, which synthetizes acetyl-CoA [17]. BCFA are derived from branched-chain amino acids, whereas SCFA are derived from acetyl-CoA. We propose that the accumulation of the pdh mRNA in the ΔcshA strain at low temperature exacerbates the production of SCFA, at the expense of BCFA production.

In addition to showing the importance of mRNA decay pathways and in particular the function of the CshA DEAD-box protein in membrane homeostasis, this work also emphasizes the importance on the connection between central metabolism and fatty acids homeostasis.

Results

Mutations in genes involved in fatty acids metabolism suppress cold-sensitivity of ΔcshA

To get insight into the biological pathways impeded in a ΔcshA mutant we performed a genetic screen to isolate spontaneous suppressors that improve growth at 25°C. At this temperature the ΔcshA mutant did not cause the death of the bacteria but showed a pronounced growth delay with colonies appearing in 4 to 5 days compared to the wt strain that formed colonies in less than 2 days. We selected 82 suppressor strains by plating independent over-night cultures of a ΔcshA strain on Mueller Hinton broth (MH) plates at 25°C. Note that the suppressor strains showed only partial restoration of the growth with colonies appearing after 3 days of incubation. All selected strains were subjected to whole genome sequencing using a strategy where genomic DNAs were pooled in 9 groups before library preparation. Using an in-house de novo assembly-based software, SNPs and INDELs as well as larger rearrangements or transposition events were identified (see materials and methods). All the mutations used in this study were further confirmed by Sanger-sequencing and assigned to a specific suppressor strain (S1 Table). This primary analysis enabled us to attribute the number of potential mutations of interest to 16 genes (Table 1). A major outcome of the genetic screen is the high occurrence of mutations in genes linked to membrane synthesis (Fig 1, Table 1). Among them, we identified mutations in genes involved in fatty acid metabolism. In particular, accC and accD genes encode two subunits of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC complex) catalyzing the first step of fatty acid synthesis; fabD gene that encodes the malonyl-CoA-acyl carrier protein transacyclase responsible for the second step of fatty acid synthesis (Fig 1). Multiple mutations were also identified in fakA, encoding a fatty acids kinase [18], or in ahrC, encoding a transcriptional regulator shown latter here to direct the synthesis of the Branched-Chain Keto-acid Dehydrogenase (BCKD) complex involved in the synthesis of the BCFA precursors [19,20]. These results suggested unambiguously that suppression of the cold sensitive phenotype of the ΔcshA strain mainly goes through modulation of the membrane composition. We therefore set out to analyze the effect of some of the mutations on the synthesis of fatty acid to understand the basis of suppression.

Table 1

Mutations retrieved in the genetic screen.

gene function	number of mutations	mutations
Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase	5	accCM385V, accCT183I
		accDA164E,accDA164V, accDF253V
Arginine repressor	2	ahrCN31Stop,ahrCR44C
biotin pathways	3	bioYP123R-FsX1
		birAD320F-FsX28, birAR280stop
Malonyl CoA-acyl-carrier-protein transacylase	1	fabDQ164L
Fatty acid kinase	35	fakA(1)
Lipoprotein signal peptidase	1	lspAR51H-FsX11
Lipoteichoic acid synthase	12	ltas(1)
NADH dehydrogenase	5	ndhf Gdel -8nt, ndhFins_IS1181 -12nt, ndhFA223P,ndhFS263F,ndhFV267E
similar to nitrogen fixation protein	1	nfuG>A-13nt
Pyruvate dehydrogenase	5	pdhAA2P,pdhAE362Stop,pdhAG126D
		pdhBP118L
		pdhCD42Y
Unknown, in operon with fakA	1	SA1068G35V
δ-subunit of RNA polymerase	1	rpoE S83_D86dup

(1)see S1 Table for all mutations

Fig 1

Schematic of fatty acid and phospholipid synthesis pathways.

Presence of mutations of the genetic screen at the various steps are indicated by a red asterisk, with the number of mutations indicated in parenthesis. Genes targeted by the two transcriptional repressors FapR and AhrC are indicated with grey dotted arrows. Repression of FapR by malonyl-CoA and inhibition of FabI by triclosan are indicated with green arrows. ACC: acetyl-coA carboxylase complex; FabD: malonyl-CoA-acyl-carrier-protein transacyclase; FabH: Beta-ketoacyl-acyl-carrier-protein synthase III; FabG: 3-oxoacyl-acyl-carrier-protein reductase; FabZ: 3-hydroxyacyl-acyl-carrier-protein dehydratase; FabI: Enoyl-acyl-carrier-protein reductase; FabF: 3-oxoacyl-acyl-carrier-protein synthase 2; BCAT: Branched-chain aminotransferase; BCKD: Branched-Chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase complex; BCFA: Branched-Chain Fatty Acids; SCFA: Straight-Chain Fatty Acids; TCA cycle: tricarboxylic acid cycle. PlsX: phosphate acyl transferase; PlsY: glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; PlsC: 1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyl transferase; FakA: fatty acid kinase; LTA: LipoTeichoic Acid, LtaS: LipoTeichoic Acid Synthase; FapR: fatty acid and phospholipid regulator; AhrC: arginine metabolism transcriptional regulator.

Decreased activity of FASII suppresses the ΔcshA cold-growth phenotype

The formation of malonyl-CoA and its interaction with FapR (fatty acid and phospholipid regulator), a transcriptional repressor of 4 operons, was shown to be a key point in the fatty acid and phospholipid synthesis pathway [21-23]. FapR-mediated transcriptional control of genes encoding FASII and phospholipid biosynthesis proteins is, so far, the only well-characterized regulation of these processes established in S. aureus. This feedforward mechanism enables the expression of its targets only if the substrate is available and links the expression of genes involved in both fatty acid and phospholipid synthesis. Interestingly, 5 mutations were located in 2 genes of the 4 subunits of the ACC complex, AccC and AccD, which catalyzes the first step of fatty acid synthesis producing malonyl-CoA from acetyl-CoA (Table 1 and Fig 1). In order to assess whether these mutations were increasing or decreasing the activity of the complex, we monitored the repressor function of the malonyl-CoA sensitive FapR. If malonyl-CoA is elevated and binds to FapR, the repressor cannot bind to the operator and synthesis occurs, whereas if the ACC activity is low, resulting in low malonyl-CoA concentration, the repressor binds to its targets. We therefore measured the fapR messenger level, which is part of the fapR-plsX-fabD-fabG operon and controlled by itself, by RT-qPCR in exponentially growing cells cultivated at 25°C. The results show first that fapR operon expression is increased 4-fold in ΔcshA compared to the wt strain (discussed later) and second and importantly that in the 4 ACC suppressor strains tested the fapR operon expression decreased by about 2-fold compared to the parental ΔcshA strain, suggesting a lower production of malonyl-CoA (Fig 2A).

Fig 2

Decreased activity of FASII favors the cold growth of the ΔcshA strain.

(A) fapR mRNA levels decrease in ACC and biotin related suppressor strains. fapR mRNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference gene on total RNAs extracted from wt strain (PR01), ΔcshA strain (PR01-ΔcshA), and suppressor strains ΔcshA/accC (C51), ΔcshA/accC (sup30), ΔcshA/accD (sup17), ΔcshA/accD (sup16), ΔcshA/birA (C58), ΔcshA/birA (sup1) and ΔcshA/bioY (C66), all at exponential growth phase in MH medium at 25°C. n = 5 for ΔcshA, 4 for wt and 3 for all others. Expression is shown as arbitrary units, where the wt level is set to 1. Standard deviations are represented. Numerical data are shown in S1 File. (B) fapR mRNA level increases in a fabD mutant. Total RNA was extracted from exponentially growing cells in MH medium at 37°C in wt (PR01) and fabD (SVK86). Top panel: Northern blot of RNA separated by agarose/formaldehyde gel electrophoresis, hybridized with a probe against the fapR gene. Lower panel: methylene blue coloration of the membrane used in top panel; 16S and 23S rRNA are indicated. Expression level of fapR mRNA from phosphoimager quantification is shown as arbitrary units, where wt level is set to 1, and is the result from 4 biological replicates for each strain. Standard deviations are indicated. (C) Over-night cultures of transformants of wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA) and ΔcshB (PR01-09) strains, carrying either the empty vector (pCN47) or pHU-fapR (pVK102), a plasmid expressing FapR under control of the constitutive hu promoter were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing erythromycin, and incubated at 37°C or 25°C. (D) Addition of triclosan favors ΔcshA growth at 25°C. Over-night cultures of wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA) and ΔcshB (PR01-09) strains, were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing uracil and triclosan at the indicated concentrations and incubated at 37°C or 25°C.

Moreover, we identified three mutations located in genes involved in biotin synthesis or uptake pathways (Table 1), with two mutations in birA, encoding the bifunctional biotin ligase and transcriptional repressor, and one in bioY, the substrate-specific S component of the biotin ECF transporter [24]. Since biotin is a cofactor of the ACC complex, we determined whether its activity is also affected by these mutations using the same read-out than above. Fig 2A shows that indeed the level of fapR mRNA decreased in the 3 biotin-related mutants when compared to the ΔcshA strain, suggesting a loss of ACC activity in these strains. We also obtained a mutation in the gene encoding FabD (fabD), which performs the second step of fatty acid biosynthesis (Fig 1), i.e. the production of malonyl-ACP from malonyl-CoA. However, this suppressor strain also contains another mutation in the pknB gene. To ascertain that the fabD mutation was a true suppressor of ΔcshA, both the fabD and the pknB mutations were reconstructed in ΔcshA. The results show that the mutation in fabD indeed suppresses the cold sensitivity of ΔcshA, whereas the pknB mutation does not (S1 Fig). When FapR regulon expression was measured in a fabD mutant, in an otherwise wt background, we observed an accumulation of fapR mRNA (Fig 2B). This is in agreement with a decreased activity of FabD, leading to an accumulation of the unused malonyl-CoA and therefore higher expression of FapR regulon.

The above results indicate that lowering down FASII activity favors the growth of a ΔcshA strain at 25°C. To confirm this result, we first attempted to decrease expression of the overall FapR regulon by over-expression of the FapR repressor. For this purpose fapR was cloned on a multicopy plasmid under the control of the hu constitutive promoter leading to the pHU-fapR plasmid. Fig 2C shows that the presence of pHU-fapR in ΔcshA was able to improve its growth at 25°C. This effect was specific to the ΔcshA strain as introduction of pHU-fapR in both wt or ΔcshB strain, another cold-sensitive DEAD box RNA helicase mutant, does not improve growth (Fig 2C). Second, we used the disinfectant triclosan that targets the enoyl reductase FabI protein of the FASII cycle (Fig 1). Interestingly, the results showed that addition of triclosan, at sub-lethal doses, also improved the growth of the ΔcshA strain at 25°C, whereas the growth of ΔcshB was not restored (Fig 2D). The above results establish a clear link between the activity of FASII and the inability of ΔcshA strain to grow in the cold.

Increased BCKD synthesis favors growth of a ΔcshA strain at low temperature

While the mutations described above clearly link the suppression of the cold sensitivity of a ΔcshA strain with decreased activity of the FASII system, it does not explain by itself why. Mutations in the ahrC gene reveal an interesting possible answer. The ahrC gene, mutated independently twice in the suppressor screen, is a transcriptional repressor of the arginine biosynthesis pathway (Table 1) [25]. One mutation, ahrC, is located in its DNA binding motif whereas the second, ahrC, introduces a stop codon at the very beginning of the ORF indicating that inactivation of ahrC favors the growth of ΔcshA in the cold. Whereas the arginine biosynthesis pathway and FASII activity have not been interconnected so far, the genetic organization of ahrC found in S. aureus offers a possible explanation that links these mutations to membrane synthesis. Indeed, ahrC is found upstream of the recN gene and the 4 genes (lpdA, bfmAAA, bfmBAB, bfmBB) encoding the BCKD complex involved in the synthesis of branched-chain fatty acid (BCFA) precursors (Fig 3A) [19,20]. As AhrC regulates its own gene, we hypothesized that its inactivation leads to an increase of the expression of the BCKD genes. We therefore measured the bfmBAA mRNA level by RT-qPCR in the 2 ahrC suppressor strains and compared it to ΔcshA grown at mid-exponential phase at 25°C. The results showed that indeed bfmBAA expression increased more than 2-fold in the two ahrC mutants (Fig 3B). Interestingly, we showed that, whereas the expression of wt ahrC from a multicopy plasmid eliminated the effect of both suppressor mutations, the mutant ahrC on a plasmid in a ΔcshA strain suppressed the cold sensitivity indicating a dominant negative effect of the mutation (Fig 3C). Moreover, the presence of wt ahrC on a multicopy plasmid in a wt strain resulted in a cold sensitive growth defect (Fig 3C), consistent with reduced expression of the BCKD enzymes [20]. However, we could not distinguish between an effect due to decreased expression of the AhrC regulon or an effect of BCKD gene down-regulation. We therefore expressed the BCKD genes on a multicopy plasmid and showed that, in accordance with our hypothesis, this over-expression improved specifically the growth of the ΔcshA strain at low temperature (Fig 3D), whereas the ΔcshB cold growth was unchanged. The above results indicate that BCKD synthesis is driven at least in part by the AhrC-controlled promoter and suggests that BCKD over-expression and hence increased BCFA production favors growth of the helicase mutant at low temperature.

Fig 3

BCKD over-expression favors ΔcshA cold growth.

(A) Genetic organisation of the ahrC locus. Schematic representation of the genomic locus of the transcriptional repressor ahrC (not at scale). The mutations in ahrC obtained in the screen are indicated. lpdA, bfmBAA, bfmBAB, and bfmBB encode proteins of the Branched-Chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase complex (BCKD). (B) bfmBAA mRNA level increase in ahrC mutants. Total RNA was extracted from exponentially growing cells in MH medium at 25°C, in wt strain (PR01), ΔcshA strain (PR01-ΔcshA), and suppressor strains ΔcshA/ahrC (C9) and ΔcshA/accD(C57). bfmBAA mRNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference gene. Expression is shown as arbitrary units, where the wt level is set to 1. Standard deviations are represented. n = 4 for wt and ΔcshA and 3 for the others. Numerical data are shown in S1 File. (C) Effect of over-expression of wt allele and mutant allele of AhrC in wt, ΔcshA and ahrC suppressor strains. Over-night cultures of transformants of strains wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA), ΔcshA/ahrC (C57) and ΔcshA/ahrC (C9) with the empty vector (pCN47) or plasmids expressing AhrC wt (pVK174) or AhrCR44C (pVK176), were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing erythromycin, and incubated at the indicated temperatures. (D) Expression of BCKD complex from a multicopy plasmid partially restores ΔcshA growth at 25°C. Over-night cultures of transformants of strains wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA) and ΔcshB (PR01-09) with empty vector (pCN47) or a plasmid expressing the four BCKD genes (pVK197) were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing erythromycin, and incubated at the indicated temperatures.

The RNA helicase mutant can no longer increase branched-chain fatty acids

Fatty acids composition of the membrane is highly changing depending on strains, media, and especially on the temperature with an increased BCFA production associated with a decrease of chain length, required to sustain growth at lower temperature [14,15]. As the above results indicate a requirement for over-expression of the BCKD complex to favor ΔcshA cold growth, we analyzed the fatty acid profile in wt and ΔcshA strains to see whether membrane accommodation was effective. Interestingly, we observed during our study that the suppressor mutations efficiently favored the growth of a ΔcshA when plated at 25°C, whereas in liquid they did not improve growth of the helicase mutant, and in some cases made it even worse. The suppressors are thus specific for the screening condition and we therefore analyzed the fatty acid content from cells harvested from solid medium. At 37°C in wt SCFA represent only 17.4%, whereas BCFA are highly abundant reaching 82.6% in Muller Hinton, which has already been reported in[26](Fig 4A). When lowering the temperature, differences are therefore subtle but reproducible and SCFA decreased as expected from 17.4% at 37°C to 13.9% at 25°C in the wt strain (Fig 4A), and chain length decreases (S2 File). Remarkably and in contrast to the wt strain, the SCFA content in ΔcshA mutant stayed constant when changing from 37°C and 25°C, remaining at about 20% at 25°C, while chain lengths are overall longer than in the wt strain (S2 File). As a control, we analyzed the fatty acid composition of ΔcshB strain, which is also cold sensitive, and showed that it is similar to the wt strain decreasing from 18.1% at 37°C to 14.2% at 25°C, indicating that fatty acid composition in ΔcshA is specific and not a consequence of slow growth. We next analyzed the fatty acid profile in a set of suppressors incubated at 25°C and found that in all cases the BCFA content was restored close to or even slightly higher than in the wt (Fig 4B). This result suggests that the ΔcshA strain is not able to accommodate its membrane at low temperatures, whereas the selected suppressor strains restore this defect.

Fig 4

ΔcshA strain fails to accommodate its membrane to low temperature.

(A) Changes of fatty acid profile at 37°C versus 25°C. Relative percentage of BCFA and SCFA measured by gas chromatography from wt, ΔcshA and ΔcshB strains scrapped from agar plates incubated at 37 or 25°C. Mean and standards deviation are represented (n = 3 for wt and ΔcshA and 2 for ΔcshB). See complete data set in S2 File (B) BCFA content is restored in suppressor strains. Relative percentage of BCFA and SCFA measured by gas chromatography from wt, ΔcshA and suppressor strains scrapped from agar plates incubated at 25°C. Mean and standard deviations are represented (n = 3 for wt and ΔcshA, 2 for ΔcshA/ΔfakA::kana (SVK48) and ΔcshA/pdh (f: C43). fabD cumulated with ΔcshA, was tested twice both with the selected suppressor strain (a: C53) or the reconstructed one (b: SVK92). The two suppressor strains containing mutations in ahrC were both tested once: c = ΔcshA/ahrC (C9) and d = ΔcshA/ahrC (C57). e is a second mutation in pdh, tested once: ΔcshA/pdhA (sup26). See S2 File for complete data set and analysis by fatty acid types and chain length.

Increased fapR operon mRNA level does not explain the cold sensitivity of a ΔcshA strain

As mentioned above, the fapR operon, which comprises fapR but also plsX, fabG and fabD, is over-expressed about 4-fold at 25°C in a ΔcshA strain. Such an increase is in agreement with our previous study on the global effect of the absence of CshA on mRNA decay, which showed that fapR mRNA half-life increased about 2-fold in a ΔcshA at 37°C [9]. In B. subtilis the deletion of the fapR gene, which leads to over-expression of the entire FapR regulon, results in a cold sensitive phenotype associated with fatty acids changes [23]. We therefore investigated whether the fapR operon mRNA accumulation in ΔcshA could explain its cold sensitivity. However and in sharp contrast with B. subtilis, the deletion of fapR does not confer any cold sensitivity even if the temperature is lowered down to 16°C (Fig 5A). We confirmed that two targets of FapR, the fapR-plsX-fabD-fabG and the fabH-fabF operons were overproduced in the ΔfapR strain (Fig 5B). Note that the fapR-plsX-fabD-fabG operon accumulated in ΔfapR to a similar extent than in ΔcshA. These observations tend by themselves to invalidate the hypothesis of a possible effect of the fapR operon accumulation. Nonetheless, we introduced the fapR deletion in two acc and one pdh (pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, described below) suppressor strains. In the 3 cases the suppressor mutations were still able to favor the ΔcshA at lower temperature (Fig 5C), indicating that over-expression of FapR targets does not severely impact cold growth in S. aureus.

Fig 5

fapR operon over-expression does not explain the ΔcshA cold sensitivity.

(A) Deletion of fapR does not affect growth. Over-night cultures of wt (PR01, top panels) and ΔfapR (SVK31, bottom panels), were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates and incubated at the indicated temperatures. (B) Total RNA were extracted from exponentially growing cells in MH medium at 25°C, in wt strain (PR01) and ΔfapR strain (SVK31). plsX and fabH mRNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference gene. Expression is shown as arbitrary units, where the wt level is set to 1. Standard deviations are represented. n = 2 for wt and ΔfapR. Numerical data are shown in S1 File. (C) Deletion of fapR does not interfere with the suppressor phenotype of acc or pdh mutants. Over-night cultures of wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA), ΔfapR (SVK31), ΔcshA/ΔfapR (SVK32), ΔcshA/accC (C51), and its ΔfapR derived strain (C51-ΔfapR), ΔcshA/AccD (C1), its ΔfapR derived strain (C1-ΔfapR), the ΔcshA/pdhA (C43), and its ΔfapR derived strain (C43-ΔfapR) were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates and incubated at 37°C (left panels) or 25°C (right panels).

Over-expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase as key to explain the cold sensitivity

In our suppressor screen we identified five mutations in 3 of the 4 genes encoding the subunits of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDH) responsible for the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA (Table 1, Fig 1). Acetyl-CoA is at the cross-road of many metabolic pathways and is used in particular at two different steps in fatty acid synthesis (Fig 1). First it is used by ACC to produce malonyl-CoA [27], and second by FabH, which uses either acetyl-CoA or branched-chain fatty acid precursors to produce SCFA or BCFA, respectively [28]. To determine whether the pdh mutants affect ACC activity, we measured as above fapR mRNA level in 3 pdh mutants grown on plates at 25°C. The results show that fapR mRNA level stays unchanged in the pdh suppressor strains tested when compared to ΔcshA, which suggests that the mutations do not have a major impact on ACC activity (Fig 6A). We thus hypothesized that pdh mutants affect FabH activity, which fits with a recent study that showed an increased BCFA production when PDH was inactivated [29]. In accordance with this hypothesis, Fig 4B shows that pdh mutations lead to an important increase of BCFA in ΔcshA at 25°C. We next analyzed whether this was specific to the tested condition or also occurring at 37°C and in a wt background. The results in Fig 6B show that pdh mutation has a large impact on fatty acids composition in all tested conditions, with the smallest amount of SCFA (6.3%) measured all along this study when pdh was grown at 25°C. Interestingly we noticed previously that the pdh mRNA decayed slightly slower in a ΔcshA mutant at 37°C [9] and therefore we determined the pdh mRNA half-life in both wt and ΔcshA grown at 25°C and found that the pdh mRNA in ΔcshA was further stabilized, above 2-fold, possibly because the RNA structure(s) that require CshA is strengthened at lower temperature (Fig 6C). We then measured the steady state level of pdh mRNA in the specific conditions of this study (ie., on plates incubated at 25°C) and showed that indeed the entire polycistronic pdh mRNA accumulated in ΔcshA compared to the wt strain (Fig 6D). We therefore tested whether pdh over-expression by itself would interfere with growth at reduced temperature, by expression of the entire operon on a multicopy plasmid. The results show that in presence of the pdh operon on a plasmid, the growth was reduced at 37°C and severely impacted at 25°C (Fig 6E, upper panel). As acetyl-CoA is used by many processes, the observed effect could be due to erroneous regulation of various pathways and does not show by itself that pdh over-expression was related to imbalance of BCFA/SCFA ratio. We therefore introduced the p-PDH plasmid into the fabD mutant identified in the ΔcshA suppressor screen and reconstructed in a wt background, and found that its effect on growth was much less severe (Fig 6E, bottom panels). Moreover, addition of 2 ng/ml of triclosan also favored the growth of the PDH over-expressing strain (Fig 6E, middle panels). It is to note that in both cases the suppressor effect is observed at 25°C, whereas the growth defect at 37°C was neither suppressed by the fabD mutation nor the addition of triclosan, suggesting that defect at 37°C may not be related to fatty acid synthesis and may be due to deregulation of another pathway using acetyl-CoA. These results showed that lowering the FASII activity compensates the over-expression of pdh as it was observed in the ΔcshA strain. This suggests that the growth defect in absence of CshA could be due, at least in part, to the role of CshA in pdh mRNA turnover. Interestingly we previously showed that RNase Y, when devoid of its membrane anchor, was able to suppress the ΔcshA growth defect [30]. There, we hypothesized that RNase Y would access more efficiently some mRNAs when not anchored to the membrane, therefore compensating for the CshA requirement for degradation. We therefore analyzed the pdh mRNA accumulation in a ΔcshA/rny double mutant grown on plates at 25°C by RT-qPCR and found that, whereas the pdh level stays unchanged in pdh or ahrC mutants, the rny mutant restores the pdh mRNA close to wt level (Fig 6F). Altogether these results suggest that the requirement of CshA for efficient pdh mRNA decay could explain at least in part its cold sensitivity.

Fig 6

PDH over-expression in ΔcshA may explain its cold sensitivity.

(A) fapR expression is not influenced by pdh mutations. Total RNA was extracted from cells scrapped from MH agar plates containing uracil and incubated at 25°C. The strains were wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA), ΔcshA/pdhA (C43), ΔcshA/pdhA (sup26), ΔcshA/pdhC (C12), ΔcshA/pdhA (C45) and ΔcshA/pdhB (C55). fapR mRNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference gene. Expression is shown in arbitrary units, where the wt level is set to 1. Standard deviations are represented for PR01 (n = 4), PR01-ΔcshA (n = 3), C43 (n = 5), sup26 (n = 5) and C45(n = 3). Numerical data are shown in S1 File. (B) Increased BCFA content in pdh mutants. Relative percentage of BCFA (iso-odd, iso-even and anteiso) and SCFA from wt, ΔcshA, pdh (SVK88) and ΔcshA/pdh (C43) strains scrapped from plates incubated at 37 or 25°C. Mean and standard deviations are represented (n = 3 for wt and ΔcshA and 2 for pdh and ΔcshA/pdh). See complete data set in S2 File. (C) pdh mRNA half-life increase in ΔcshA. Total RNA was extracted from wt (PR01) and ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA) from exponentially growing cells in MH at 25°C, 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 20 min after rifampicin addition at 400 μg/ml. The mRNA levels of SA0944, the second gene of the pdh operon encoding PdhB, were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference. Expression is shown in arbitrary units, where time 0 after rifampicin addition was set to 100% and the decay plotted on a semi-logarithmic scale. The calculated half-life of pdh mRNA is indicated for each strain. Numerical data are shown in S1 File. (D) pdh mRNA accumulate in ΔcshA grown on plate at 25°C. Total RNA was extracted from wt (PR01) and ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA) cells scrapped from plates incubated at 25°C. Northern blot of RNA separated by formaldehyde/agarose gel electrophoresis and hybridized with a probe against the pdhD gene (top panel). Lower panel: methylene blue coloration of the membrane used in top panel; 16S and 23S rRNA are indicated. (E) Expression of the pdh operon from a multicopy plasmid severely impacts growth in the cold but is partially suppressed by a fabD mutation or addition of triclosan. Over-night cultures of transformants of wt (PR01) or fabD (SVK86) strains with empty vector (pCN47) or a plasmid expressing the entire pdh operon (pVK203) were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing erythromycin, and incubated at the indicated temperatures. Indicated plates contain 2 ng/ml of triclosan. (F) Increased pdh mRNA level in ΔcshA is not changed by pdh or ahrC mutants but is lowered down by the rny truncation. Total RNA was extracted from cells incubated at 25°C and scrapped from MH agar plates. The strains were wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA), ΔcshA/pdhA(C43), ΔcshA/ahrC (C57) and ΔcshA/rny (SVK7). The mRNA levels of SA0944, the second gene of the pdh operon encoding PdhB, were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference gene. Expression is shown as arbitrary units, where wt was set to 1. Standard deviations are represented for wt (PR01, n = 6), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA, n = 5), ΔcshA/pdhA (C43, n = 3), ΔcshA/ahrC (C57, n = 3) and ΔcshA/rny (SVK7, n = 4). Numerical data are shown in supplementary 2.

Acetate supplementation inhibits growth at 25°C in MH media

Our data suggest that over-expression of pdh interferes with accurate BCFA synthesis. In respect to this hypothesis, a recent study proposed that the membrane composition is influenced by carbon flow and in particular acetyl-CoA flow [31]. It showed that addition of acetate in the medium leads to a decrease in BCFA, probably due to an overflow of acetyl-CoA towards SCFA synthesis, which we believe also occurs in the ΔcshA strain. The authors also showed that addition of acetate also leads to increased staphyloxanthin production, known to have a rigidification effect on the membrane. We thus tested the effect of acetate supplementation both in wt and ΔcshA, but also in their respective derivates devoid of the capacity to produce staphyloxanthin, by the deletion of the crt operon, to exclude any effect of its product. Fig 7A shows that, whereas addition of acetate has a minor effect on growth at 37°C, the growth at 25°C of both the wt and ΔcshA strain is markedly affected, resulting in a pronounced growth delay. Results are similar in the Δcrt derivates excluding any major effect of staphyloxathin production in the growth delay (Fig 7B), which is in accordance with a recent study where the respective impact of staphyloxanthin and BCFA production on growth was evaluated and showed that the second had a major impact whereas the first affected growth to a minor extent [31,32].

Fig 7

Acetate supplementation alters cold growth of the wt strain.

(A) Over-night cultures of wt (PR01) and ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA) were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing uracil and, when indicated, 10mM Na-acetate and incubated at 37°C or 25°C as indicated. (B) Staphyloxanthin does not influence cold growth. Over-night cultures of Δcrt (SVK109) and Δcrt/ΔcshA (SVK110) were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing uracil and, when indicated, 10mM Na-acetate and incubated at 37°C or 25°C as indicated.

Effect of acetate on different Staphylococcus aureus strains

We tested whether acetate sensitivity at 25°C observed above was a specific characteristic of the strain used in this study or common to different Staphylococcus aureus lineages. Fig 8 shows that acetate supplementation impedes growth of almost all strains tested, with a minor, if any, effect on strain 8325.4. Interestingly the acetate supplementation growth defect at low temperature was suppressed by addition of triclosan as observed for the ΔcshA strain, suggesting a similar mechanism. Astonishingly, we noticed a large variability of cold growth between strains in MH even without acetate addition, with a marked slow growth for USA300 JE2 and Newman strains. More strikingly this slow growth phenotype was also suppressed when triclosan was added in the plate raising the question of a defect of BCFA content in these strains. It is to note that cold growth defect by addition of acetate is dependent on the media. Indeed, acetate addition in LB or TSB does not lead to a pronounced growth defect as observed in MH, with smaller colonies already appearing after 2 days of incubation for most of the strains (S2 Fig). The Newman and USA300 JE2, in contrast to what observed in MH, grew correctly at low temperature in both LB and TSB. However, in contrast to the other strains, they are sensitive to acetate supplementation, in particular USA300 JE2. Moreover, this defect was compensated by triclosan addition which underlines a correlation between the efficiency of growth at low temperature in MH and sensitivity to acetate in other media.

Fig 8

Acetate supplementation alters cold growth of various S. aureus strains.

Over-night cultures of various S. aureus strains, PR01, S30, COL, 8325.4, Newman and USA300 JE2 were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing uracil and, when indicated, 10 mM Na-acetate and/or 2 ng/ml of triclosan and incubated at 37°C or 25°C.

Suppressor mutations from the ΔcshA screen suppress the acetate mediated growth defect at 25°C

As shown above, addition of triclosan which suppresses the ΔcshA cold growth defect, also restore the slow growth due to acetate supplementation of the wt strain. We therefore tested whether mutations that suppress ΔcshA cold growth could also compensate for growth on acetate at 25°C. For this purpose, various mutations identified in the screen were constructed in the wt strain. We first tested the above described mutations: 4 ACC mutants (accC, accD, accD, accD), the fabD, pdh, ahrc and the rny, which all indeed counteracted the defect of growth observed with acetate (Fig 9A). We also tested whether the over-expression of BCKD enzymes, the AhrCR44C mutant or the FapR protein, all shown above to compensate ΔcshA cold growth, also improve the growth of the wt strain in acetate supplemented media at 25°C, which indeed was the case (Fig 9B). In addition to these mutations, the screen identified other genes, not studied further here, but for which we wanted to see whether their mutations were also able to compensate cold growth on acetate which would indicate a related mechanism of suppression. Our results showed that all mutations tested with no exception compensated indeed the growth of the otherwise wt strains when grown at 25°C on acetate (Fig 9C). The mutations are in the rpoE, fakA, lspA, ltaS, nfu, and ndhF genes. The rpoE gene encodes the additional δ-subunit of the firmicute RNA polymerase [33]. We constructed the rpoE, as selected in the screen as well as a full deletion of the rpoE gene. Both were able to compensate the cold growth on acetate (Fig 9C), however we have not identified the transcriptomic changes that could account for the observed phenotypes. The fakA gene, that encodes a fatty acid kinase, was found inactivated multiple times in the screen (S1 Table). FakA, along with its lipid binding partners, phosphorylates free fatty acids and is essential for both incorporation of exogenous fatty acids and fatty acid turnover [18,34]. It was recently reported that its inactivation alters acetate metabolism by an unknown mechanism [35], which would explain its occurrence in the screen as favoring the redirection of acetyl-CoA flow towards acetate production rather than SCFA. The ltaS gene encodes the lipoteichoic acid synthetase responsible for lipoteichoic acid (LTA) synthesis [36]. This gene was found mutated in 12 strains of the genetic screen, and most mutants inactivated the synthesis of LTA as shown by the absence of LTA analyzed by western blot (S3 Fig). We constructed both a complete deletion of the ltas gene or introduced stop codon or point mutations in the binding pocket of LtaS (ltaS, ltaS, ltaS) as found in the screen and showed that all restored the 25°C growth on acetate (Fig 9C). The lspA gene encodes the lipoprotein-specific type II signal peptidase [37]. The mutation introduced a frameshift at the beginning of the coding sequence indicating that lspA is inactivated, and that lipoproteins are not entirely matured with the signal peptide still remaining. Inactivation of lspA or ltaS likely have major and various impacts on membrane properties as lipoteichoic acid and lipoproteins are abundant components of the membrane, but the particular reason for their presence in the screen has not been studied further. The nfu gene encodes a Fe-S cluster carrier [38,39]. The mutation is upstream of the coding region in the Shine Dalgarno sequence (AGGAGA to AAGAGA) likely decreasing the expression of the Nfu protein. All proteins requiring Fe-S cluster are possible interesting targets to explain the observed phenotype. It is interesting to note that Nfu and SufT, another Fe-S cluster carrier, were suggested to be important for LipA activity, which requires a Fe-S cluster and is, in turn, essential for lipoic acid synthesis, an essential cofactor of PDH [40]. It is tempting, although purely speculative, to envisage that this mutation decreased PDH activity. The last gene tested is ndhF, encoding a NADH dehydrogenase responsible for the recycling of NAD+ from NADH. Of the 5 mutations in this gene one is the insertion of a mobile element between the promoter and the coding sequence, whereas one is a change in the Shine Dalgarno sequence, suggesting that decreased activity of NdhF is responsible for the observed phenotype. Such a decrease, leading to an increased NADH/NAD+ ratio, would therefore have many consequences on metabolism but one interesting hypothesis is that it regulates the activity of PDH which is inactivated by NADH [41]. It is also to note that NdhF contains a Fe-S cluster and maybe the important target for the nfu mutation. Whatever the specific mechanism for all selected mutants, our data suggested that these genes all participate to the same mechanism, i.e., modifying membrane properties. In agreement with this, analysis of fatty acid profiles in two of the ΔcshA suppressor strains containing rpoE or fakA mutants, respectively, showed an increased BCFA production compared to the parental ΔcshA (Fig 4B). The above results indicate that acetate supplementation on wt cells mimics the effect of a ΔcshA deletion, strongly supporting our hypothesis that cold sensitivity of the helicase mutant is at least partially due to SCFA/BCFA ratio imbalance, caused by pdh mRNA accumulation, which in absence of CshA is no longer degraded efficiently.

Fig 9

Cold growth defect by acetate supplementation is compensated by ΔcshA suppressor mutations.

(A) Over-night cultures of wt (PR01), accD (SVK131), accD (SVK132), accD (SVK133), accC (SVK134), fabD (SVK86), pdh (SVK88), ahrC (SVK128) and rnyΔ (PR01-03) were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing, when indicated 10mM acetate and incubated at 37°C and 25°C. (B) Over-night cultures of transformants of wt (PR01) strain with empty vector (pCN47) or plasmid expressing FapR (pVK102), BCKD (pVK197) or AhrCR44C (pVK176), were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing erythromycin, and 10mM acetate when indicated, and incubated at the indicated temperatures. (C) Over-night cultures of wt (PR01), rpoE (SVK41), ΔrpoE (SVK39), ΔfakA::kana (SVK47), nfu (SVK115), lspA (SVK116), ΔltaS::kana (SVK43), ltaS (SVK119), ltaS (SVK120), ltaS (SVK123), ndhF (SVK124), ndhF (SVK125), ndhF (SVK126), ndhF (SVK127), were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates containing, when indicated, 10mM acetate and incubated at 37°C and 25°C.

Discussion

Cold sensitivity of ΔcshA strain is in part due to imbalance of SCFA versus BCFA

Our previous work showed that the inactivation of the gene encoding the DEAD-box RNA helicase CshA from S. aureus results in a growth defect at low temperatures [8,9]. This is reminiscent of mutations in two of the five E. coli RNA helicases, CsdA and SrmB, which render the bacteria cold sensitive, if absent. Both of these proteins were shown to be involved in ribosome biogenesis and a suppressor screen in a ΔsrmB context revealed mutations in the 5S and 23S rDNA [13]. Moreover, it has been suggested that CshA in B. subtilis may be involved in ribosome biogenesis, since its absence led to a decrease in mature ribosome and a relative increase of the 30S subunit [3]. Since we and others have shown that CshA associates with RNases in S. aureus and B. subtilis and is involved in RNA turnover [4,6,9], the aim of this study was to decipher the reason of the cold sensitivity caused by the absence of CshA. We therefore have undertaken a large genetic screen and selected 82 spontaneous and independently occurring suppressor mutations. The screen was incredibly powerful and enabled us to pinpoint one major physiological pathway affected: two-thirds of the mutations are present in genes involved in membrane synthesis. This immediately suggested that the helicase mutant might be, at least in part, deficient in adapting the membrane composition, when shifted to lower temperatures. The mutations in the ahrC gene directly pinpointed towards a requirement of increased BCFA production to compensate the ΔcshA growth defect. We found that the two ahrC mutants led to increased expression of the bckd genes located downstream of the ahrC gene which controls its own expression, whereas in contrast, overproduction of wt ahrC drastically decreased the ability of the wt cells to grow in the cold. We confirmed that BCKD over-expression by itself compensated the growth defect of the ΔcshA strain by expressing the four genes from a multicopy plasmid. Proper function of the membrane at low temperature requires adaptation involving mostly fatty acid composition changes, allowing incorporation of lower melting point molecules. In E. coli, this is achieved through increased production of unsaturated fatty acid. In some Gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacillus subtilis but not in Staphylococcus aureus, desaturase exists and is proposed to be involved in short-term adaptation [42,43] whereas the major response for long-term adaptation relies on increased production of branched-chain fatty acids and decreased chain-length [15]. We therefore performed a fatty acid composition analysis in the wt and ΔcshA strain at different temperatures. As expected the SCFA content in the wt strain decreased at lower temperature. In sharp contrast to the wt situation, the SCFA content stayed unchanged between 37°C and 25°C in the ΔcshA strain. Altogether these experiments indicated that the cold sensitivity of the ΔcshA strain is due at least in part to its inability to accommodate the BCFA content at low temperatures. A conclusion supported by the fact that all suppressor mutants tested restored BCFA content close to wt strain level.

pdh mRNA accumulation in ΔcshA could explain part of the cold sensitivity

To find the molecular basis explaining the defect of BCFA observed in a ΔcshA strain, we took advantage of our previous study where overall mRNA decay was measured in the helicase mutant compared to the wt [9]. From this analysis two operons, fapR and pdh, retained our attention because they were decaying slower in ΔcshA and both were found mutated in our genetic screen. The first operon encodes, in addition to FapR, the three proteins PlsX, FabD and FabG, involved in fatty acid or phospholipid synthesis. Upregulation of the FapR regulon in B. subtilis leads to changes in fatty acid profile and cold sensitivity [23]. However, the hypothesis that the ΔcshA defect could be due to increased expression of fapR operon was invalidated as the deletion of fapR does not counteract the suppressor effect of acc or pdh mutations, nor did it led to cold sensitivity of the wt strain in contrast to the observation made in B. subtilis [23]. Our second candidate, the pdh operon, in which we found 5 different mutations, appears as an attractive candidate in light of a recent study, which showed that inactivation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase leads to a marked increase of BCFA [29]. We therefore hypothesized that its over-expression could result in a decreased BCFA content. We showed that, as expected, the pdh operon was over-expressed in the ΔcshA mutant and that its over-expression from a multicopy plasmid in the wt strain strongly affected the growth, in particular at low temperature. Importantly this effect was alleviated by the ΔcshA suppressor mutation in the fabD gene or by addition of triclosan, which favors the growth of ΔcshA at low temperature. Acetyl-CoA is used at two steps in fatty acid synthesis: first by the ACC to produce malonyl-CoA and second by FabH, using it as the primer of the FASII cycle to produce SCFA. The fact that we observed no change in the transcriptional activity of the fapR repressor in the 5 pdh suppressor strains, argues for a major effect of the mutation on the step carried out by FabH. Interestingly, the 2 pdh suppressor mutants tested for fatty acid analysis showed the most drastic changes, reducing the level of SFCA below the wt level. The effect was even more dramatic when one of the mutations was transferred to the wt strain, going from about 10% of SCFA at 37°C to 6% at 25°C (Fig 6B). These experiments showed that reducing PDH activity could have tremendous effects on BCFA versus SCFA content and that pdh over-expression is highly deleterious for growth.

Acetate supplementation leads to the same defect as deletion of cshA

Our data indicate that acetyl-CoA flow towards SCFA production is exacerbated in the ΔcshA strain, leading to an improper ratio of SCFA versus BCFA. This conclusion is in agreement with a recent study that established a link between central metabolism and membrane composition and showed that supplementation of the media with acetate leads to increased production of SCFA [31]. A key experiment of our study was the observation that acetate supplementation has a deleterious effect on growth at low temperatures. More importantly, this effect was suppressed in various conditions that we showed here to suppress the ΔcshA cold growth defect, which strongly reinforces our conclusion. Regulation of fatty acid composition is far from being well understood in S. aureus. Our study contributes to a growing body of evidence linking fatty acid composition to central metabolism, with the PDH complex and acetyl-CoA flow at the center of this regulation. It enlightens its importance since its perturbation could actually have major effects on BCFA content which in turn leads to a marked effect on cold growth. We also observed large differences between media or strains, which probably underlines the complexity of the interplay between central metabolism and fatty acid content. To be fully understood, this would require the combination of metabolomic, transcriptomic and fatty acid profile analyses in various strains and growth conditions, which is well beyond the scope of this study. It nevertheless pinpoints the fact that these aspects need be taken in consideration when studying these processes.

Mutations in genes involved in fatty acid metabolism restored ΔcshA growth at low temperature

In addition to mutations in pdh, we found that mutations in FASII genes or the addition of substance like triclosan favored the growth of ΔcshA at low temperatures. Our data indicate that whereas over-expression of FASII genes has no effect on cold growth in contrast to what is observed in B. subtilis, their downregulation, either transcriptionally or by mutation, restored ΔcshA growth, indicating that the activity of the FASII enzymes by itself is important for setting the BCFA content. How this is achieved has not been directly investigated in this study, however, we have performed an extended fatty acid analysis with the fabD mutants, both in the ΔcshA and in an otherwise wt background (S4 Fig). Lower production of SCFA in fabD mutants is already observed at 37°C (14%), suggesting that decreased production of malonyl-ACP favors BCFA precursor-priming by FabH by an unknown process. Interestingly, decreasing the temperature does not lead to further decrease in SCFA, and level stays similar to the 37°C condition. This is different of what is observed in the pdh mutants which have lower level of SCFA at 37°C (around 10%) and decrease them further at 25°C down to about 6%. It thus appears that the fabD mutant does no longer respond to the temperature whereas the pdh mutant still does, even if the BCFA content is already high. In addition to FASII genes, another gene involved in fatty acid metabolism, fakA, was found mutated in the screen. The high occurrence of mutations (in 35 strains) in fakA probably reflects two biases of the genetic screen: the efficiency of suppression in genes whose mutations have no obvious fitness cost and multiple ways to inactivate a gene. It is important to note that this screen therefore provides a large collection of mutants that could be interesting in a study aiming at elucidating the structure-function of the FAK complex. The FAK complex, which is constituted of the kinase FakA and the lipid binding partners FakB1 or FakB2 that present the fatty acid to the kinase, plays an important function in acquisition of fatty acid from the host, as phosphorylation of free fatty acid make them competent for incorporation in phospholipid synthesis pathway [18]. It was also shown to promote phosphorylation of endogenous free fatty acid and thereby promoting fatty acid turnover in S. aureus [34]. A recent report and particularly interesting study in light of our own showed that inactivation of fakA impacts the acetate switch, resulting in high secretion of acetate during exponential growth [35]. We can thus propose that fakA mutations help ΔcshA growth through the redirection of acetyl-CoA flow away from SCFA synthesis. To date it remains unknown how the absence of FakA could have such an effect on metabolism, which constitutes a highly relevant topic in the field in the near future, but it exemplified another link between fatty acid and metabolism.

Cold sensitivity and function of CshA in mRNA decay

In the present study, we proposed that part of the cold growth defect of the ΔcshA mutant is due to its implication in pdh mRNA turnover. Along with the mRNA decay defect hypothesis, we previously described a suppressor allele of rny encoding RNase Y that can restore growth at low temperature [30] and we showed here that it restores pdh mRNA levels. So far we have shown that the two major phenotypes associated with the inactivation of cshA, (i.e., decrease in biofilm formation and cold sensitivity) could be related to its function in mRNA decay, showing the importance of this process in the adaptation to changes in growth conditions. However, our studies do not exclude an additional role of CshA in ribosome biogenesis and more experiments will be needed to identify the precise sequences or structures targeted by CshA.

Materials and methods

Growth of strains and media

All strains were grown in Mueller-Hinton broth (Becton-Dickinson), or when indicated in LB or TSB (Becton-Dickinson). Uracil to 20 mg/l, was added in all conditions as the parental wt strain used for this study (PR01) is ΔpyrEF. 10 mg/l erythromycin or 1 to 4 ng/ml triclosan (Sigma-Aldrich) was added when indicated. 10mM Na-acetate (EMD-millipore corp) was first added in conjunction to 20 mM MOPS pH7.4 to avoid acidification of the media but this was shown to be unnecessary.

Strains and plasmids

Suppressor strains were selected by platting 50 μl of ON cultures of ΔcshA strain grown at 37°C in MH medium, our standard lab medium, on MH plate at 25°C, a temperature where the ΔcshA mutant still grows but with a marked delay. Candidates were further purified once at 25°C, to selected true positive candidates and once at 37°C, to evaluate their capacity to grow at higher temperature. The various mutants on the genome were reconstructed as described in [44]. Plasmids and strains are described in S1 Table.

Variant calling

Genomic DNA were extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen), preceded with a lysis step using lysostaphin to 200ug/ml in TE, during 15 min at 37°C.

To identify the mutations in the genomes of the 82 ΔcshA cold-suppressing strains, we carried out whole genome sequencing with Illumina HiSeq 2500 technology (Fasteris SA). In order to optimize library preparation costs, the DNA of 6–12 samples were pooled together at equal concentration and prepared as one single library. Using this pooling strategy, a mutation in one strain is expected to affect 8%-16% of the reads at the concerned genomic locus, which is far above the expected sequencing error of the instrument (~1%). Regarding sequencing depth, we targeted ~3 millions paired-end reads of size 2x125bp per strain, which approximately corresponds to a coverage of 300x.

For the identification of the mutations, we built an analysis pipeline on a de novo assembly strategy that can detect big rearrangements of the genome. More specifically, we used the de novo assembly software SGA [45] to filter the reads of low quality and trim the adapters, to perform kmer-counting in the reads, and to generate contigs by de novo assembly without simplification of the assembly graph. In all the processes we used k-mers of 61 nucleotides (61-mers). More specifically to put in evidence mutations (single nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions, deletions or big rearrangements) in a sequenced pool of DNA, we used 61-mers that are specific of the sequenced reads when compared to the reference genome, S. aureus strain SA564 (RefSeq assembly GCF_001281145.1). To further reduce false positive matches produced by sequencing errors, we additionally required the 61-mer to be seen at least 10 times in the sequenced reads, and 10 times in the reverse-complemented reads. Then the resulting pool-specific 61-mers were used to identify the contigs of the de novo assembly that carry the mutations. These mutated contigs were mapped on the reference genome with the software BWA [46]and converted to BAM format for manual investigation in the genome browser IGV.

A custom R script additionally processed the mapping results and generated a report summarizing several statistics that helped in manual curation of the output. In particular, the report contained for each mutated contig the length of the contig, the number of 61-mers that have allowed to call this mutated contig, the average number of occurrences of the 61-mers in the sequenced reads, whether the contig aligned on the reference genome, in case of alignment the positions (potentially multiple) where it aligned and genes located nearby, and an analysis of the CIGAR string to identify the type of mutation (e.g. SNP, insertion, deletion, rearrangement). The calling pipeline has been automatized and the code is freely available at (https://gitlab.unige.ch/LinderLab/evar) and the software has been packaged as a docker container (plinderlab/evar).

Data availability: the DNA sequencing data of the ΔcshA suppressors have been deposited on GEO database with accession number GSE133013.

RNA extraction

RNA was extracted using the RNAsnap method [47] from cultures harvested in mid-exponential phase at an OD600 of ~0.4 or from cells scrapped from solid agar media. For decay analysis, rifampicin to 400 ng/ml was added at OD600 of ~0.4 and aliquots were withdrawn at the indicated times. Cultures were immediately mixed with large volume of ice-cold ethanol/acetone (50% v/v), thereby immediately blocking further RNA decay as well as killing the cells. Cells were broken using 0.1mm zirconia/silica beads (Biospec Product) in MP Biomedicals Instrument FastPrep-24, 3X30sec at maximal speed. RNA was either directly used for Northern blot or further purified for RT-qPCR by treating 5 to 10 μg of total RNA with RQ1 DNase (Promega), reducing final concentration of formamide to 5% in the reaction, and incubated 30 min at 37°C. RNA was then cleaned-up using RNA Clean & Concentrator-5 kit (Zymoresearch) with an additional DNase step on column as specified by the manufacturer.

RT-qPCR

mRNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using 2,5 ng of total RNA per reaction and the Promega kit (GoTaq-1step RT-qPCR system) and the following cycling condition: 42°C 15min/95°C-10 min/(95°C-10sec/60°C-30sec/72°C-30sec)X40-melting curve 60–95°C in a CFX96 C1000Thermal Cycler (BioRad). Oligonucleotides are indicated in S1 Table. 16S was used as the reference gene [48].

Northern blot

Equal amounts of total RNA in each lane were separated on 1.2% agarose/formaldehyde gel and MOPS buffer, transferred on HybondN+ membrane (Amersham) by capillarity blotting and crosslinked using UV stratalinker 2400 (Stratagene). Loading was controlled by methylene blue coloration of the membrane, enabling to position 16S and 23S rRNA migration used as size markers. DNA oligonucleotides radiolabeled using T4PNK kinase and (γ32P)-ATP, were hybridized to the membrane in ExpressHyb hybridization solution (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) over-night at 37°C and washed. Quantification was done by detection of the signal using a Typhoon FLA7000 phosphoimager (General Electric). Oligonucleotides are indicated in S1 Table.

Fatty acid profile

Over-night culture was diluted and plate to obtain between 4000 to 8000 bacteria on MH containing uracil large plate (diameter 150 mm) and incubated over-night at 37°C or 2, 3 or 5 days at 25°C for wt, suppressor strains or ΔcshA strain respectively. Cells were collected in PBS, wash twice, and lyophilized. Fatty acid analyses were carried out by the Identification Service of the DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany, using an Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph and version 6.1 of the MIDI Inc Sherlock MIS software. The method of preparation of the samples is the standard method given in MIDI Technical Note 101.

Western Blot

LTA was extracted from over-night cultures normalized based on OD600 readings. Samples were centrifugated and resuspend in 300 μl of PBS, lysed using 0.1mm zirconia/silica beads (Biospec Product) in MP Biomedicals Instrument FastPrep-24, 3X30sec at maximal speed. Pellets were resuspended in 100 μl of 2X SDS-page loading buffer, incubated at 95°C for 30 min, centrifuged at 17,000 x g for 5 min. 10 μl aliquots were separated on 15% SDS-PAGE gels and subsequently transferred to a PVDF membrane. LTA was detected using the monoclonal polyglycerolphosphate-specific LTA antibody (1:250; Clone 55 from Hycult Biotechnology) and the anti-mouse IgG-Peroxidase antibody (1:5000, Sigma) and blots were developed by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL-prime Amersham-GE-healthcare).

fabD mutation but not pnkB mutations suppresses ΔcshA cold growth.

Over-night cultures wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA), ΔcshA/pnkBS523F (SVK87), ΔcshA/fabDQ164L (SVK92) and ΔcshA/fabDQ164L/ pnkBS523F (C53) strains were serially diluted and spotted on MH plates and incubated at 37 C or 25 C.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Effect of acetate in LB and TSB media.

Over-night cultures of various Staphylococcus aureus strains, PR01, S30, COL, 8325.4, Newman and USA300 JE2 were serially diluted and spotted on LB (top panels) or TSB (bottom panels) plates containing when indicated 10 mM Na-acetate and 2 ng/ml of triclosan and incubated at 37°C or 25°C as indicated.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

ltas mutants impairs LTA synthesis.

LTA detection by western blot using anti-LTA antibodies in wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA), and the 12 suppressor strains containing mutations in ltaS (sup29, C34, sup22, C17, sup7, C22, C40, C52, C19, C62, C18 and C16). Note that no LTA detection was observed for all ltas mutants except in the C22 strain where LTA production seems to be lower down.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Fatty acid profile of fabD and fakA mutants.

Relative percentage of BCFA and SCFA from wt (PR01), ΔcshA (PR01-ΔcshA), fabD(SVK86), ΔcshA/fabD(SVK92 and C53), ΔfakA::kana (SVK47) and ΔcshA/ ΔfakA::kana (SVK48) 37 and 25°C, scrapped on plate. Mean and standards deviation are represented (n = 3 for wt and ΔcshA and 2 for the others, for ΔcshA/fabD data from SVK92 and C53 were combined). See complete data set in S2 File.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Bacterial strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

RT-qPCR Numerical data.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Fatty acids profile row data.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

17 Mar 2020

* Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. *

Dear Dr Linder,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'The DEAD-box RNA helicase CshA is required for fatty acid homeostasis in Staphylococcus aureus' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers.

First of all I would like to apologize for the long time it took for my decision, but the times were and are very crazy and I did not find time earlier.

As you will see from the reviewers comments, tall three highly appreciated your work and found that it is an original and remarkably well-documented study, which provides novel information on how membrane homeostasis is managed in Staphylococcus aureus.  However, they also identified some aspects of the manuscript that should be improved. Furthermore the Grammar should be improved throughout the text especially the use of plurals and prepositions. Also, a number of typos are present e.g. NADH deshydrogenase.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

In addition we ask that you:

1) Provide a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

2) Upload a Striking Image with a corresponding caption to accompany your manuscript if one is available (either a new image or an existing one from within your manuscript). If this image is judged to be suitable, it may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel square images. For examples, please browse our archive. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Note: we cannot publish copyrighted images.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript within the next 30 days. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we would ask you to let us know the expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments should be included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, you will need to go to the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

Please let us know if you have any questions while making these revisions.

Yours sincerely,

Carmen Buchrieser

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Josep Casadesús

Section Editor: Prokaryotic Genetics

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: Mutants in the DEAD-box RNA helicase CshA demonstrate a cold-sensitive phenotype. The paper represents a heavily genetic approach (appropriate for PLOS Genetics I would think) to understanding the underlying mechanism of this phenomenon. Supressor mutants were predominantly involved in the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway. The cshA mutant is defective in decreasing straight-chain fatty acids/increasing branched-chain fatty acids at low temperatures compared to the wild type. The suppressor mutants restore the wild type ratio of SCFAs to BCFAs at low temperatures. Inefficient degradation of pyruvate dehydrogenase mRNA in the mutant is proposed to play a major role in the phenomenon by favoring acetylCoA production that leads to unbalanced SCFA production. I find the work to be thorough and well written. It is not my policy to nit pick papers that I review. You do not need to convince this reviewer that staphylococcal membrane fatty acid homeostasis is an important and interesting topic.

Comments:

1. The switch in percentages between SCFA and BCFA is modest albeit reproducible apparently. Could the authors "drill down" a bit into their fatty acid analyses. For example could they look at individual fatty acid species and see how they are changing in the wild type, mutant, and suppressor mutants. They could calculate the average SCFA and BCFA carbon chain lengths to see if they shorten with lower temperature. Also is there branching switching to more anteiso (anteiso C15:0 most likely) at lower temperatures.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript “The DEAD-box RNA helicase CshA is required for fatty acid homeostasis in Staphylococcus aureus” by Khemici et al presents a comprehensive analysis of suppressors of a cshA mutant, leading to the discovery that CshA modulates expression of fatty acid synthesis (FASII) genes and dictates membrane properties. Cold-resistant suppressors of a cshA mutant mapped mainly to fatty-acid related mutations. Using different approaches, authors identify Pdh activity as the likely primary cause of cshA cold-sensitivity. Pdh synthesizes acetyl-CoA, a FASII precursor; when in excess, acetyl-CoA primes the synthesis of more rigid straight-chain fatty acids (it outcompetes branched chain acyl-CoA primers), explaining the cold-sensitive phenotype. The numerous cshA suppressor mutations, which affect steps in fatty acid metabolism, then make sense. Authors further show that acetate supplementation, which increases acetyl-CoA production, also leads to cold-sensitivity in a wild type background. Cold sensitivity due to acetate addition is alleviated in the cshA suppressor backgrounds. Several suppressor mutations were affected in membrane composition but were not clearly linked to FASII (e.g., fakA, ltaS, lspA); the present results suggest the existence of novel roles of the affected genes. Altogether, the manuscript shows that CshA activity contributes to regulating membrane rigidity by controlling Pdh-catalyzed synthesis of acetyl-CoA, the precursor of straight-chain fatty acids.

This study provides important findings in understanding S. aureus membrane physiology and its regulation. The numerous investigative approaches, rigor, and breadth of the study convincingly support authors’ main hypotheses and expand the present understanding of fatty acid regulation and membrane homeostasis. The “honest” presentation is a pleasure to read. Authors explain that the observed phenotypes are seen on solid, but not liquid medium, and are medium-dependent. This seeming limitation is actually a pointer for explaining metabolic regulation.

Please note the following suggestions/questions:

1- The main “drawback” of this in-depth study is in presenting so much data! Perhaps authors could make certain sections more concise, e.g., shortening the sections on acetate-induced cold sensitivity (starting l 386) would simplify reading. Interpretations of phenotypes might be more appropriate for Discussion.

2- The manuscript would benefit from including a model. Fig. 1 presents some results, but does not include subsequently presented information. It would be useful for readers to include the various pathways that compete for acetyl-CoA (the acetate connection as here, and also TCA, pigments and cell wall). The main concept (membrane fluidity as controlled by CshA) is exciting and could be depicted schematically. A shorter Discussion (there is redundancy with Results) with a summary Figure could better bring out the importance of the findings.

3- Does the ltaS mutation impact fatty acid composition as shown for other mutants?

4- L 122: Authors propose that “accumulation of the pdh mRNA in the DcshA strain at low temperature exacerbates the production of SCFA, at the expense of BCFA production”. Authors could discuss why their previous transcriptome study of a cshA mutant (Ref 9) did not detect changes in pdh.

5- L 268 Could the fact that solid, but not liquid medium, selects for suppressors indicate that the TCA cycle, which also uses acetyl-CoA, may be less active in colonies? Have authors compared cold-sensitivity of cshA in anaerobic vs aerobic conditions?

6- Authors state L 352 “lowering the FASII activity [with triclosan] compensates the over-expression of pdh”. How might this be explained?

7- L510 For proper membrane function:.. “in Gram-positive bacteria, increased production of branched-chain fatty acid and decreased chain-length are the major responses”. Note that some Gram-positive like B subtilis express a phospholipid desaturase, which may allow rapid membrane adjustments (DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.10.3228-3231).

8- Table S1: C40: ltaSF64L-FsX2, what is FsX2?; Line 235 should read ahrC., line 261 “higly”. Check for numerous typos.

Reviewer #3: The authors have an extensive history of influential manuscripts describing the roles performed by DEAD-box RNA helicases in the opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. In the current manuscript the authors expand these studies by performing a genetic screen to identify suppressors of the cold growth defects exhibited by the delta-cshA mutant. Genome sequencing indicated that genes associated with fatty acid metabolism were altered in many of the isolated repressors. Extensive experimental analysis correlated the low temperature phenotype with CshA alteration of the membrane fatty acid composition at low temperature. These observations provide unique insights into bacterial perception and genetic/physiological response to low temperature stress associated with RNA helicase-mediated RNA decay and alteration of membrane composition.

Major comments

Mutation in the 82 suppressor strains suppresses the cshA cold sensitive phenotype allowing growth at low temperature. Many of these suppressors are in genes associated with fatty acid synthesis. Thus in these mutants a decrease in cellular ability to synthesize fatty acids, specifically BCFA, which be expected, synthesis of which would be required to make the membrane more fluid at low temperature. Thus should the cells not die at low temperature?

While reading the manuscript I frequently wondered if, overall, the gene/membrane composition observations could result from a secondary effect from a more global regulator/pathway whose effect is enhanced at 25oC? The authors also struggle with this possibility at a number of points in the text.

For example, 13 of the hits occur upstream of the formation of malonyl-CoA. Thus, overall could the results not be explained by a defect in malonyl CoA utilization since it is used in numerous other pathways.

Line 188; The authors should check if the assumption that malonyl-CoA levels are reduced in the mutant. A 2-fold reduction in transcript level may not generate a decrease in product levels that is significant enough to alter carbon flow. In the manuscript, results that change transcript levels by 2-fold are frequently observed.

Potentially associated with the above comments, I wonder why the link between suppressor mutation and fatty acid/phospholipid composition was only analyzed for a subset of the mutants in the figures. I understand the reasoning to focus on the mutants in the initial parts of the pathway however a substantial proportion of the hits were in fakA (35) and ltas (12).

With respect to fakA and ltas, how does their high prevalence in the data set fit into the overall conclusion that cshA indirectly affects membrane composition via pdh half-life since they act much below pdh.

Similar to the malonyl-CoA comment, could at least a portion of the results originate from fakA alteration of free fatty acid turnover? Although exogenous FAs do not shut off endogenous synthesis in Staphylococcus, could the results from the addition of exogenous fatty acids be insightful? In summary, further investigation of fakA and ltas could be insightful and further support the hypothesis.

Significant emphasis was placed on alteration of the effects caused by exogenous acetate. Were common effects associated with acetate addition the best way to prove the hypothesis? In addition, while the effect of acetate on growth of various Staph strains was extensively studied at 37 and 25oC including delta-cshA and delta-cshA-delta-crt and in the presence or absence of triclosan (Figs. 8 and S2), why was the suppression of cold sensitivity by the other suppressors identified in the screen not investigated?

Indicate why MH media was used in these studies. Importantly, was suppression of cold sensitivity also observed in: 1) liquid, 2) minimal media, and 3) rich media as well?

Similarly, why was 25oC chosen as the cold stress temperature? Are reduced or enhanced effects observed at higher and lower temperatures?

The answer to the media question above is provided on Lines 266-269, the suppressors did not suppress cold sensitivity in liquid media (which one?). While an interesting observation, it is also potentially disturbing re the overall hypothesis presented. It would be beneficial if the authors could investigate the causes of this observation further.

Additional comments

Lines 125-127: It is not clear how this work connects “central metabolism” with fatty acid homeostasis.

Figure 1. Include branch sites leading to the formation of BCFA and SCFA forms. Associated with the ACC step, add AccC (2) and AccD (3) to be consistent. Indicate where Lipoteichoic acid synthase (12) contributes to the depicted biosynthetic pathway(?).

Figure 2. Need an internal control for relative quantification in 2B.

Fig. 2D. Why was growth of cshB severely reduced by triclosan at both temperatures while wild type grew relatively normally?

Figure 3. Lines 243-249. Does ahrCN31stop also suppress the cold sensitivity through a dominant-negative effect in wild type?

How many of the identified suppressor genes convey suppression of the cold sensitivity to delta-cshA similar to ahrC and BCKD shown in this figure?

Figure 4 and S4. Are the SCFA values statistically significant, both within each strain and between strains? Have changes of a similar magnitude been observed in FA ratios in Staph (e.g. reference 26) or other Gram-positive bacteria during temperature shift?

Also, is an increase in BCFA of ~4% (wt 37 vs 25oC) or a decrease of ~7% (delta-cshA 37 vs 25oC) sufficient to generate a lipid membrane that is functionally more or less fluid, respectively?

Figure 5. Clarify why FapR regulation of target gene expression was observed to not be involved in suppression of low temperature sensitivity, as indicated by the authors. As I understand the system, fapR mutation should have suppressed the low temperature sensitivity, however it did not and thus apparently invalidates the hypothesis. I also do not see the utility or corresponding insight gained by introducing the accC/D and pdhA mutations into the delta-cshA-delta-fapR mutant. From the nature of the suppressor screen would it not be anticipated that the accC/D and pdhA mutations, in the absence of delta-frpR, would be expected to confer suppression of the cold sensitivity in a delta-cshA background, similar to the results shown for other suppressor genes in Figure 3? Are accC/D and pdhA even regulated by FrpR?

Am I missing something?

Why are fapR transcript levels elevated to a similar degree in delta-cshA and delta-cshA plus the 3 phdA mutants while other suppressors reduce fapR levels, as shown in Fig. 2? Is there a unique insight provided by the difference between the FapR effect on the two sets of mutants?

Lines 333-336; How is the pdh northern blot in Fig. 6D indicative of the enhanced accumulation of the entire pdh operon?

Lines 348-352; It is interesting that growth is inhibited by p-PDH at 37oC and the authors predict it reflects deregulation of another pathway that utilizes acetyl CoA.

Is this not evidence that the results could be explained by a defect in malonyl CoA utilization as it is used in numerous other pathways.

Fig. 6F. Would it be useful to repeat this experiment at 37oC? Possibly more insightful, how are fapR levels affected in the delta-rny strain?

Figure 7. A potentially useful addition to this or other figures would include results from the artificial alteration of membrane fluidity caused by exposure to staphyloxanthine or benzyl alcohol. Would pdh transcript levels change in response to these compounds?

Figure 8. Provide as Supporting Information?

Figure S2. How is LTA still formed in the C22 mutant?

“gram-negative” should be changed to “Gram-negative” in the entire document

Materials and Methods

Lines 640-644: Could the authors elaborate on the criteria used to: 1) select the initial suppressor colonies and 2) further purify candidates once at 25°C and why they were also purified at 37°C.

Line 707; Could a more suitable control gene other than 16S rRNA be used for RT-qPCR quantification? The quoted paper identifies 16S rRNA as suitable in stationary phase cultures.

Lines 709-721: Provide further details regarding the RNA loading control used for Northern analysis and how quantification of signal intensities was performed.

Lines 726-729: Provide further details re the loading controls, standardization, identification and relative abundance determination related to fatty acid composition identification.

Lines 730-740: Provide further details regarding how LRT was extracted and how loading was controlled for western blot analysis detection.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

12 Apr 2020

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

15 Apr 2020

Dear Dr Linder,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "The DEAD-box RNA helicase CshA is required for fatty acid homeostasis in Staphylococcus aureus" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Carmen Buchrieser

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Josep Casadesús

Section Editor: Prokaryotic Genetics

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly:

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-20-00207R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

25 Jun 2020

PGENETICS-D-20-00207R1

The DEAD-box RNA helicase CshA is required for fatty acid homeostasis in Staphylococcus aureus

Dear Dr Linder,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "The DEAD-box RNA helicase CshA is required for fatty acid homeostasis in Staphylococcus aureus" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Jason Norris

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics