Jessica Valdebenito1, Felipe Medina1,2. 1. Programa de Bioestadística, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 2. Instituto de Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GB, formally glioblastoma multiforme) is a malignant type of brain cancer that currently has no cure and is characterized by being highly heterogeneous with high rates of re-incidence and therapy resistance. Thus, it is urgent to characterize the mechanisms of GB pathogenesis to help researchers identify novel therapeutic targets to cure this devastating disease. Recently, a promising approach to identifying novel therapeutic targets is the integration of tumor omics data with clinical information using machine learning (ML) techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: ML has become a valuable addition to the researcher's toolbox, thanks to its flexibility, multidimensional approach, and a growing community of users. The goal of this review is to introduce basic concepts and applications of ML for studying GB to clinicians and practitioners who are new to data science. ML applications include exploring large data sets, finding new relevant patterns, predicting outcomes, or merely understanding associations of the complex molecular networks presented within the tumor. Here, we review ML applications published between 2008 and 2018 and discuss ML strategies intending to identify new potential therapeutic targets to improve the management and treatment of GB. CONCLUSIONS: ML applications to study GB vary in purpose and complexity, with positive results. In GB studies, ML is often used to analyze high-dimensional datasets with prediction or classification as a primary goal. Despite the strengths of ML techniques, they are not fail-safe and methodological issues can occur in GB studies that use them. This is why researchers need to be aware of these issues when planning and appraising studies that apply ML to the study of GB.
BACKGROUND:Glioblastoma (GB, formally glioblastoma multiforme) is a malignant type of brain cancer that currently has no cure and is characterized by being highly heterogeneous with high rates of re-incidence and therapy resistance. Thus, it is urgent to characterize the mechanisms of GB pathogenesis to help researchers identify novel therapeutic targets to cure this devastating disease. Recently, a promising approach to identifying novel therapeutic targets is the integration of tumor omics data with clinical information using machine learning (ML) techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: ML has become a valuable addition to the researcher's toolbox, thanks to its flexibility, multidimensional approach, and a growing community of users. The goal of this review is to introduce basic concepts and applications of ML for studying GB to clinicians and practitioners who are new to data science. ML applications include exploring large data sets, finding new relevant patterns, predicting outcomes, or merely understanding associations of the complex molecular networks presented within the tumor. Here, we review ML applications published between 2008 and 2018 and discuss ML strategies intending to identify new potential therapeutic targets to improve the management and treatment of GB. CONCLUSIONS: ML applications to study GB vary in purpose and complexity, with positive results. In GB studies, ML is often used to analyze high-dimensional datasets with prediction or classification as a primary goal. Despite the strengths of ML techniques, they are not fail-safe and methodological issues can occur in GB studies that use them. This is why researchers need to be aware of these issues when planning and appraising studies that apply ML to the study of GB.
Authors: Philipp Kickingereder; David Bonekamp; Martha Nowosielski; Annekathrin Kratz; Martin Sill; Sina Burth; Antje Wick; Oliver Eidel; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch; Jürgen Debus; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; David Jones; Stefan Pfister; Wolfgang Wick; Andreas von Deimling; Martin Bendszus; David Capper Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jigisha P Thakkar; Therese A Dolecek; Craig Horbinski; Quinn T Ostrom; Donita D Lightner; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; John L Villano Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ken Chang; Biqi Zhang; Xiaotao Guo; Min Zong; Rifaquat Rahman; David Sanchez; Nicolette Winder; David A Reardon; Binsheng Zhao; Patrick Y Wen; Raymond Y Huang Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Jeffrey D Rudie; Andreas M Rauschecker; R Nick Bryan; Christos Davatzikos; Suyash Mohan Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Panagiotis Korfiatis; Timothy L Kline; Lucie Coufalova; Daniel H Lachance; Ian F Parney; Rickey E Carter; Jan C Buckner; Bradley J Erickson Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Gopal S Tandel; Mainak Biswas; Omprakash G Kakde; Ashish Tiwari; Harman S Suri; Monica Turk; John R Laird; Christopher K Asare; Annabel A Ankrah; N N Khanna; B K Madhusudhan; Luca Saba; Jasjit S Suri Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 6.639