| Literature DB >> 32727550 |
Jinming Wang1, Shandian Gao1, Shangdi Zhang2, Xin He1, Junlong Liu1, Aihong Liu1, Youquan Li1, Guangyuan Liu1, Jianxun Luo1, Guiquan Guan3, Hong Yin4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Babesia motasi is known as an etiological agent of human and ovine babesiosis. Diagnosis of babesiosis is traditionally performed by microscopy, examining Giemsa-stained thin peripheral blood smears. Rapid detection and accurate identification of species are desirable for clinical care and epidemiological studies.Entities:
Keywords: Babesia motasi; Cross-priming amplification; Detection; Human babesiosis; Identification; Ovine babesiosis; Vertical flow visualization strip
Year: 2020 PMID: 32727550 PMCID: PMC7391542 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04246-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
The sequences of B. motasi CPA-VF primers and probes
| Primer name | Sequence (5′-3′) | |
|---|---|---|
| Set one | BLT-5 s | GCTAATTGTAGGGCTAATACAAG |
| BLT-2 s | FITC-CGATGCCTTTTGGCGGCG | |
| BLT-3 s | Biotin-GCTTTTAAACCAATTGTTGG | |
| BLT-2s1a | CGATGCCTTTTGGCGGCGCGATTCGCAAGTTTATTATG | |
| BLT-4a | CTTGAATGGAACATCGCTAA | |
| Set two | BLT-5 s | GGADWWDGTCCGKTTTTG |
| BLT-2 s | FITC-CTTAGAGGGACTCCTGC | |
| BLT-3 s | Biotin-GCTTGAAGCGTGGGGT | |
| BLT-2s1a | CTTAGAGGGACTCCTGCCAGACCTGTTATTGCCTT | |
| BLT-4a | CGCCTGCCGTTCGACGATT |
Fig. 1Optimization of CPA reaction temperature and time and limit of detection evaluation of the CPA-VF assay with serial dilution of B. motasi DNA. a Reaction temperature of CPA-VF assay. b Reaction time of CPA-VF assay. c Detection limit of the CPA-VF
Fig. 2Evaluation of specificity of the CPA-VF with genomic DNA (B. motasi Lintan, B. motasi Tianzhu, B. motasi Hebei, B. motasi Ningxian, Babesia sp. Xinjiang, Babesia sp. Dunhuang, T. uilenbergi, T. luwenshuni, T. ovis, A. ovis, B. duncani and B. divergens) and plasmids (B. microti and B. crassa)
Standard positive and negative samples, confirmed by thin blood smear microscopy and nested PCR combined with gene sequencing
| Result | Negative ( | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 10 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 42 | |
| Negative | 48 | 48 | ||||
| Total | 10 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 48 | 90 |
n number of samples
The performance of the CPA-VF assay compared with that of RT-PCR
| Result | Detection method | |
|---|---|---|
| RT-PCR | CPA-VF | |
| True positive | 38 | 40 |
| False positive | 1 | 2 |
| True negative | 47 | 46 |
| False negative | 4 | 2 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 90.5 (72–97.6) | 95.2 (78.1–99.4) |
| Specificity (%) | 97.9 (83.5–99.9) | 95.8 (80.5–99.5) |