| Literature DB >> 14678566 |
Jennifer Jelsma1, Kristian Hansen, Willy De Weerdt, Paul De Cock, Paul Kind.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quality of life weights based on valuations of health states are often used in cost utility analysis and population health measures. This paper reports on an attempt to develop quality of life weights within the Zimbabwe context.Entities:
Year: 2003 PMID: 14678566 PMCID: PMC317383 DOI: 10.1186/1478-7954-1-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Popul Health Metr ISSN: 1478-7954
Demographic details of study sample compared to population figures.
| Sample Frequency | Sample proportion % (95% CI) | Population proportion % (95% CI) | |
| Males | 904 | 38.3 (36.3–40.3) | 52.8 (52.4–53.1) |
| Females | 1,457 | 61.7 (59.7–63.7) | 47.3 (46.9–47.6) |
| Total | 2,361 | ||
| Missing | 23 | ||
| 15–24 years | 1,097 | 46.2 (44.2–48.2) | 38.9 (38.6–39.3) |
| 25–34 years | 781 | 32.9 (31.0–34.8) | 30.3 (30.0–30.7) |
| 35–44 years | 268 | 11.3 (11.0–12.6) | 15.5 (15.2–15.8) |
| 45–54 years | 162 | 6.8 (5.8–7.9) | 8.0 (7.7–8.2) |
| 55–64 years | 49 | 2.1 (1.5–2.7) | 4.8 (4.6–5.0) |
| 65+ years | 17 | 0.7 (0.4–1.1) | 2.4 (2.3–2.6) |
| Total | 2,374 | ||
| Missing | 10 | ||
| 10 or fewer years | 458 | 19.2 (17.7–20.9) | 48.9 (48.8–49.1) |
| 11–13 years | 1,600 | 67.1 (65.2–69.0) | 48.4 (48.3–48.5) |
| Post school | 18 | 0.8 (0.49–1.2) | 2.6 (2.6–2.7) |
| Total | 2,076 | ||
| Missing | 308 | ||
| Scholar/studying further | 361 | 16.8 (15.2–18.4) | 11.6 (11.6–11.7) |
| Employed | 718 | 33.3 (31.3–35.4) | 54.2 (54.1–54.3) |
| Unemployed | 1,075 | 49.9 (47.8–52.0) | 34.2 (34.1–34.3) |
| Total | 2,154 | ||
| Missing | 230 | ||
| Owner | 740 | 34.8 (36.9–34.8) | 30 |
| Renting | 169 | 7.9 (6.8–9.2) | 7 |
| Lodging | 961 | 45.2 (43.1–47.3) | 48 |
| Other | 256 | 12.0 (10.7–13.5) | 15 |
| Total | 2,126 | ||
| Missing | 258 | ||
*Compared to Highfield population, 1992 [28]. †Compared to Harare Province population, 1992 [28].
Self-reported health status of subjects in urban Zimbabwe (N = 2,183) compared to the United Kingdom [9]. Frequency of levels on each dimension of EQ-5D are reported as percentages.
| Dimension | Mobility | Self care | Usual Activities | Pain/discomfort | Anxiety/depression | |||||
| Level | Zim | UK | Zim | UK | Zim | UK | Zim | UK | Zim | UK |
| 1.00 | 90.1 | 82 | 96.5 | 96 | 89.0 | 84 | 69.5 | 67 | 69.3 | 79 |
| 2.00 | 9.7 | 18 | 3.4 | 4 | 10.5 | 14 | 26.3 | 29 | 23.9 | 19 |
| 3.00 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2 | 4.2 | 4 | 6.8 | 2 |
Results of ANOVA full factorial model with Type III least squares (N = 12,663). The dependent variable was the TTO score, and random factors entered included research assistant, health state, occupational category and gender.
| Degrees of freedom | Mean Square | Degrees of freedom | Mean Square | ||||
| Effect | Effect | Error | Error | F | p | % Variance | |
| Error | 34.97 | ||||||
| Health state | 39 | 3.50 | 1,225 | 0.13 | 27.51 | 0.00 | 51.40 |
| RA*health state | 289 | 0.75 | 15,102 | 0.08 | 9.58 | 0.00 | 7.10 |
| Research assistant (RA) | 8 | 1.05 | 942 | 0.12 | 8.89 | 0.00 | 5.56 |
| Occupation | 3 | 0.59 | 74 | 0.10 | 5.77 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| RA*occupation | 24 | 0.20 | 15,102 | 0.08 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 0.21 |
| Gender*occupation | 5 | 0.11 | 15,102 | 0.08 | 1.47 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| Occupation*health state | 111 | 0.08 | 15,102 | 0.08 | 1.03 | 0.41 | 0.01 |
| Gender | 2 | 0.01 | 16 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.93 | 0.00 |
| RA*gender | 15 | 0.06 | 15,102 | 0.08 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| Gender*health state | 74 | 0.05 | 15,102 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Wald tests for fixed effects (N = 12,663)
| Fixed term | Wald statistic | d.f. | Wald/df. | χ2 prob. |
| Mobility | 9772.4 | 2 | 4886.2 | <0.001 |
| Self care | 2070.1 | 2 | 1035.1 | <0.001 |
| Usual activities | 426.1 | 2 | 213.0 | <0.001 |
| Pain/discomfort | 2338.0 | 2 | 1169.0 | <0.001 |
| Anxiety/depression | 544.7 | 2 | 272.3 | <0.001 |
| Mobility | 544.7 | 2 | 272.4 | <0.001 |
| Self care | 674.0 | 2 | 337.0 | <0.001 |
| Usual activities | 253.2 | 2 | 126.6 | <0.001 |
| Pain/discomfort | 1789.0 | 2 | 894.5 | <0.001 |
| Anxiety/depression | 544.7 | 2 | 272.3 | <0.001 |
Main effects in residual maximum likelihood linear mixed model based on 12,663 observations.
| Level | Effect | Std. Err. | |
| Constant | 0.900 | ||
| Mobility | 2 | -0.056 | 0.0080 |
| 3 | -0.204 | 0.0089 | |
| Self care | 2 | -0.092 | 0.0074 |
| 3 | -0.231 | 0.0089 | |
| Usual activities | 2 | -0.043 | 0.0079 |
| 3 | -0.135 | 0.0088 | |
| Pain/discomfort | 2 | -0.067 | 0.0070 |
| 3 | -0.302 | 0.0076 | |
| Anxiety/depression | 2 | -0.046 | 0.0073 |
| 3 | -0.173 | 0.0076 |
Mean observed and predicted time trade-off scores for 38 health states, for internal samples (N = 12,663 values) and external samples (N = 6,357) in Zimbabwe compared to observed values in the United Kingdom [8].
| Internal sample | External sample | UK Sample | |||
| Health State | Observed mean | Observed mean | Predicted mean* | Absolute difference | Observed |
| 11111 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.03 | |
| 11112 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.05 | 0.834 |
| 11113 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.02 | 0.392 |
| 11121 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.850 |
| 11122 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.08 | 0.722 |
| 11131 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.200 |
| 11133 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.03 | -0.049 |
| 11211 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.02 | 0.869 |
| 11312 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.03 | 0.552 |
| 12111 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.02 | 0.834 |
| 12121 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.06 | 0.742 |
| 12211 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.12 | 0.767 |
| 12222 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.06 | 0.552 |
| 12223 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.04 | 0.216 |
| 13212 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.389 |
| 13311 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 0.346 |
| 13332 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.10 | -0.228 |
| 21222 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.09 | 0.553 |
| 21232 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.01 | 0.064 |
| 21312 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.536 |
| 22112 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.662 |
| 22121 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.01 | 0.645 |
| 22122 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.04 | 0.540 |
| 22222 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.01 | 0.500 |
| 22233 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.07 | -0.142 |
| 22323 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.05 | 0.042 |
| 22331 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.02 | -0.011 |
| 23232 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.05 | -0.084 |
| 23321 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 0.147 |
| 32223 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.02 | -0.174 |
| 32232 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.00 | -0.223 |
| 32313 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.14 | -0.152 |
| 32331 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.11 | -0.276 |
| 33212 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.00 | -0.022 |
| 33232 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.12 | -0.332 |
| 33321 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.08 | -0.120 |
| 33323 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.07 | -0.386 |
| 33333 | -0.24 | -0.24 | -0.15 | 0.09 | -0.543 |
| MAE† | 0.049 | 0.045 | 0.039 | ||
*Based on estimates †MAE=Mean absolute difference between observed and predicted means
Figure 1Observed TTO scores (divided by 10) of the full Zimbabwe sample (N = 19,020 values from 2,183 respondents), compared to observed scores from the Measurement and Valuation of Health study in the United Kingdom [8].