| Literature DB >> 32722579 |
Anastasia Tsiola1,2,3, Grégoire Michoud4, Stilianos Fodelianakis4, Ioannis Karakassis2, Georgios Kotoulas3, Alexandra Pavlidou5, Christina Pavloudi3, Paraskevi Pitta1, Nomiki Simboura5, Daniele Daffonchio4, Manolis Tsapakis1.
Abstract
Viruses interfere with their host's metabolism through the expression of auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs) that, until now, are mostly studied under large physicochemical gradients. Here, we focus on coastal marine ecosystems and we sequence the viral metagenome (virome) of samples with discrete levels of human-driven disturbances. We aim to describe the relevance of viromics with respect to ecological quality status, defined by the classic seawater trophic index (TRIX). Neither viral (family level) nor bacterial (family level, based on 16S rRNA sequencing) community structure correlated with TRIX. AMGs involved in the Calvin and tricarboxylic acid cycles were found at stations with poor ecological quality, supporting viral lysis by modifying the host's energy supply. AMGs involved in "non-traditional" energy-production pathways (3HP, sulfur oxidation) were found irrespective of ecological quality, highlighting the importance of recognizing the prevalent metabolic paths and their intermediate byproducts. Various AMGs explained the variability between stations with poor vs. good ecological quality. Our study confirms the pivotal role of the virome content in ecosystem functioning, acting as a "pool" of available functions that may be transferred to the hosts. Further, it suggests that AMGs could be used as an ultra-sensitive metric of energy-production pathways with relevance in the vulnerable coastal zone and its ecological quality.Entities:
Keywords: auxiliary metabolic genes; coastal zone; community composition; metagenomics; pollution
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722579 PMCID: PMC7472104 DOI: 10.3390/v12080806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1(a) Map of the sampling stations in the Ionian and South Aegean seas. (b) Sample-grouping substantiation. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) of the coastal seawater physicochemical variables (solid-lined circle), depicting the sample grouping based on the ecological quality and Pearson correlations of the physicochemical variables with the canonical axes. SiO4: silicate concentration, DO: dissolved oxygen concentration, POC: particulate organic carbon concentration, TN: total nitrogen concentration, TP: total phosphorus concentration, Chl α: chlorophyll α concentration, PO4: phosphate concentration, NO3 and NO2: nitrate and nitrite concentrations, NH4: ammonium concentration, Dens: density, C: conductivity, S: salinity, T: temperature. Stations are colored based on the annual surface trophic index (TRIX) range and named after “Good” (blue) when having overall good ecological quality (TRIX = 1.6–2.8), and “MoPoB” (green) when having overall poor ecological quality (TRIX > 2.8).
Abiotic variables. Temperature (T, oC), conductivity (C, mS cm1), salinity (S, psu), density (Dens, kg m−3) and the concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO, mmole L−1), DO (% DO Dev), silicate (SiO4, μM), phosphate (PO4, μg L−1), nitrate (NO3, μg L−1), nitrite (NO2, μg L−1), ammonium (NH4, μg L−1), total nitrogen (TN, μM), total phosphorus (TP, μM), particulate phosphorus (PP, μΜ), particulate organic carbon (POC, μM), and chlorophyll α (Chl α, μg L−1), along with the resulting TRIX (surface-waters March TRIX values and categories). The annual surface TRIX (surface-waters annual TRIX values and categories) are presented in capital letters and were used for the grouping of the sampling stations in this study. The depth-integrated annual TRIX is also presented in the last column for comparison with the surface ones.
| Station ID | T | C |
| Dens | DO | DO Dev% | SiO4 | PO4 | NO3 | NO2 | NH4 | TN | TP | PP | POC | Chl α | Surface-Waters March TRIX | Surface-Waters Annual TRIX | Depth-Integrated Annual TRIX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heraklion | 17.49 | 49.91 | 38.94 | 28.80 | 5.30 | 0.14 | 0.99 | 2.85 | 3.26 | 0.48 | 5.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 1.74 | 0.24 | 1.19 (H) | 2.22 (GOOD) | 1.75 (G) |
| Kefalonia | 14.18 | 45.33 | 38.01 | 28.47 | 5.78 | 1.75 | 1.56 | 2.25 | 9.67 | 1.56 | 3.29 | 7.73 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 11.58 | 0.94 | 2.69 (G) | 2.62 (GOOD) | 2.87 (M) |
| South Patraikos | 14.76 | 46.08 | 38.15 | 28.46 | 5.88 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 13.25 | 350.11 | 8.65 | 15.96 | 8.00 | 0.80 | 0.09 | 14.00 | 0.43 | 4.60 (P) | 2.12 (GOOD) | 2.45 (G) |
| West Patraikos | 14.18 | 45.78 | 38.44 | 28.81 | 5.88 | 3.75 | 4.97 | 8.30 | 57.47 | 7.87 | 3.29 | 6.38 | 0.54 | 0.06 | 10.83 | 0.33 | 3.63 (M) | 2.58 (GOOD) | 3.02 (M) |
| Messolonghi | 14.05 | 45.09 | 37.91 | 28.43 | 5.79 | 1.50 | 3.69 | 2.25 | 48.79 | 7.91 | 3.11 | 6.40 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 7.02 | 0.33 | 2.77 (G) | 2.21 (GOOD) | 2.06 (G) |
| Messiniakos | 16.37 | 48.07 | 38.39 | 28.28 | 5.45 | 0.35 | 1.49 | 3.69 | 13.21 | 3.17 | 10.77 | 4.49 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 5.52 | 0.21 | 1.97 (G) | 2.19 (GOOD) | 2..16 (G) |
| Saronikos Epidavros | 14.73 | 46.50 | 38.56 | 28.78 | 5.98 | 6.73 | 0.56 | 2.80 | 0.74 | 2.35 | 0.92 | 6.09 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 11.39 | 0.40 | 2.48 (G) | 2.14 (GOOD) | 5.32 (B) |
| Arachthos | 14.78 | 36.31 | 29.23 | 21.57 | 6.65 | 11.74 | 21.62 | 4.19 | 6.70 | 2.25 | 0.92 | 10.53 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 34.65 | 0.12 | 2.73 (G) | 3.73 (MODERATE) | 4.47 (P) |
| Igoumenitsa | 13.81 | 44.22 | 37.32 | 28.02 | 5.73 | 0.27 | 3.02 | 1.71 | 49.48 | 2.67 | 8.28 | 8.75 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 15.44 | 1.10 | 2.5 (G) | 3.83 (MODERATE) | 3.82 (M) |
| Kalamas | 15.51 | 46.24 | 37.56 | 27.83 | 5.61 | 4.99 | 4.24 | 1.64 | 39.18 | 5.29 | 2.87 | 5.41 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 8.99 | 0.52 | 2.88 (M) | 3.25 (MODERATE) | 3.45 (M) |
| Louros | 15.23 | 33.83 | 26.72 | 19.55 | 6.79 | 12.80 | 23.28 | 7.26 | 45.20 | 3.36 | 0.92 | 16.40 | 0.62 | 0.18 | 53.56 | 0.06 | 3.30 (M) | 4.46 (POOR) | 4.39 (P) |
| South Amvrakikos | 14.47 | 34.73 | 28.03 | 20.71 | 6.68 | 10.82 | 24.87 | 3.17 | 1.12 | 2.07 | 0.92 | 10.87 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 50.73 | 0.17 | 2.41 (G) | 3.15 (MODERATE) | 5.77 (B) |
| Saronikos Elefsina | 12.72 | 43.44 | 37.66 | 28.51 | 5.98 | 2.00 | 1.79 | 5.56 | 281.17 | 7.54 | 16.79 | 16.93 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 17.28 | 0.64 | 4.03 (P) | 4.22 (POOR) | 3.67 (M) |
| Saronikos Psittalia | 14.33 | 46.13 | 38.61 | 28.90 | 5.51 | 2.38 | 1.34 | 11.61 | 44.21 | 5.34 | 11.52 | 6.85 | 0.32 | 0.05 | 9.31 | 0.64 | 3.78 (M) | 3.52 (MODERATE) | 3.62 (M) |
Biotic variables. The number of viral lytic contigs detected and the percentage of assigned viral lytic contigs to the taxonomic level of order, family, or genus (% assigned viral lytic). The abundances of autotrophic bacteria (AB, cells mL−1), heterotrophic bacteria (HB, cells mL−1), virus-like particles (VLP, VLPs mL−1) and total bacteria (TB, cells mL−1), the ratio between virus-like particles and total bacteria (VBR), and the percentages of low-, medium-, and high-DNA-content VLPs (%LDNA V, %MDNA V, %HDNA V, respectively) and low- and high-DNA-content HB (%LDNA B and %HDNA B, respectively). Shannon–Wiener diversity indices based on 16S-derived operational taxonomic unit table on the family level (S-W Bacteria) and the viral metagenomic assignment of viral families (S-W Viruses). The total gene copies of AMGs and the Shannon–Wiener diversity index based on AMG content (S-W AMGs). Average and standard deviation (stdev) values are presented based on the two ecological quality categories.
| Sample ID | Lytic Contigs | % Assigned Viral | AB | HB | VLP | TB | VBR | %LDNA V | %MDNA V | %HDNA V | %LDNA B | %HDNA B | S-W Bacteria | S-W Viruses | Total AMGs | S-W AMGs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heraklion | 638 | 8.0% | 3 × 104 | 9 × 105 | 9 × 106 | 9 × 105 | 10.69 | 72.8% | 23.4% | 3.7% | 44.6% | 55.4% | 5.92 | 1.67 | 1,493,947 | 5.11 |
| Kefalonia | 700 | 25.1% | 3 × 104 | 9 × 105 | 2 × 107 | 1 × 106 | 16.79 | 78.9% | 17.1% | 4.0% | 58.2% | 41.8% | 4.82 | 1.87 | 636,782 | 5.15 |
| South Patraikos | 185 | 9.9% | 2 × 104 | 5 × 105 | 9 × 106 | 5 × 105 | 17.65 | 62.8% | 29.5% | 7.7% | 52.7% | 47.3% | 6.08 | 2.07 | 456,142 | 5.06 |
| West Patraikos | 261 | 9.1% | 1 × 104 | 4 × 105 | 8 × 106 | 4 × 105 | 17.07 | 63.5% | 27.4% | 9.1% | 60.4% | 39.6% | 5.82 | 1.92 | 395,112 | 5.04 |
| Messolonghi | 116 | 17.5% | 1 × 104 | 4 × 105 | 1 × 107 | 4 × 105 | 32.26 | 75.2% | 18.9% | 5.9% | 62.0% | 38.0% | 6.03 | 1.95 | 164,837 | 5.12 |
| Messiniakos | 521 | 31.5% | 5 × 104 | 2 × 106 | 1 × 107 | 2 × 106 | 5.04 | 82.0% | 15.6% | 2.4% | 68.3% | 31.7% | 4.76 | 1.67 | ||
| Saronikos Epidavros | 125 | 28.1% | 2 × 104 | 8 × 105 | 1 × 107 | 9 × 105 | 16.10 | 68.7% | 26.9% | 4.4% | 54.8% | 45.2% | 4.56 | 1.49 | 325,742 | 5.16 |
| Arachthos | 805 | 16.8% | 1 × 105 | 4 × 105 | 6 × 107 | 5 × 105 | 111.33 | 67.1% | 26.9% | 6.0% | 35.0% | 65.0% | 4.82 | 1.83 | 1,319,746 | 5.21 |
| Igoumenitsa | 1196 | 16.0% | 1 × 104 | 2 × 106 | 2 × 107 | 2 × 106 | 12.06 | 76.9% | 16.7% | 6.4% | 63.1% | 36.9% | 4.34 | 1.98 | 1,387,594 | 5.07 |
| Kalamas | 1009 | 15.3% | 5 × 104 | 1 × 106 | 1 × 107 | 1 × 106 | 13.55 | 78.1% | 18.5% | 3.4% | 55.3% | 44.7% | 5.04 | 1.79 | 545,599 | 5.21 |
| Louros | 736 | 17.7% | 2 × 105 | 7 × 105 | 8 × 107 | 9 × 105 | 84.19 | 78.2% | 18.1% | 3.7% | 36.2% | 63.8% | 5.13 | 1.76 | 4,532,574 | 5.21 |
| South Amvrakikos | 425 | 9.2% | 1 × 105 | 3 × 105 | 6 × 107 | 5 × 105 | 131.32 | 75.4% | 20.4% | 4.3% | 36.2% | 63.8% | 4.78 | 1.80 | 3,361,543 | 5.06 |
| Saronikos Elefsina | 1387 | 38.1% | 2 × 102 | 8 × 105 | 6 × 107 | 8 × 105 | 75.73 | 79.4% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 30.6% | 69.4% | 4.55 | 1.81 | 1,530,439 | 5.15 |
| Saronikos Psittalia | 98 | 9.4% | 2 × 103 | 8 × 105 | 2 × 107 | 8 × 105 | 22.71 | 77.1% | 20.4% | 2.5% | 58.6% | 41.4% | 4.86 | 1.56 | 380,858 | 5.13 |
Figure 2Viral and bacterial community profiles. (a) Viral community composition at the family level. (b) Bacterial community composition at the phylum level. “Other” bacterial phyla include: Acidobacteria, Armatimonadetes, Chlamydiae, Chlorobi, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, GN02, Gemmatimonadetes, Kazan-3B-2B, Lentisphaerae, Nitrospirae, OD1, OP11, OP3, SAR406, SBR1093, SR1, Spirochaetes, TM6, TM7, Tenericutes, Verrucomicrobia, WPS-2, WS3, and ZB3. Samples are divided in two groups based on the ecological quality, i.e. the annual TRIX range (left: stations having Good ecological quality, and right: stations having Moderate–Poor–Bad ecological quality).
Figure 3Distance-based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) plot of the distance-based linear model of the physicochemical variables fitted to (a) the viral community composition (family level) and (b) the bacterial community composition (family level). Samples are presented based on the ecological quality (annual surface TRIX range). The length and direction of the vectors indicate their relative strength and direction of relationship in the ordination plot, respectively. Community similarity was calculated via the Bray–Curtis index after a square–root transformation of the bacterial families read counts. Good: stations having good overall ecological quality and MoPoB: stations having poor and bad overall ecological quality. Selection procedure of variables: forward (Table S7).
Figure 4Auxiliary metabolic genes. The normalized abundances of auxiliary metabolic genes that were significantly different between Good and MoPoB group of stations. (a) AMGs related to dNTP synthesis and energy production, (b): AMGs related to various metabolic processes, (c): the petF AMG related to photosynthesis, and (d): the rpe AMG related to energy production. Good: stations having good overall ecological quality and MoPoB: stations having poor overall ecological quality, based on the annual TRIX range.