| Literature DB >> 32721992 |
Beatriz Vidaña1,2, Pamela Martínez-Orellana2,3, Jaime M Martorell4, Massimiliano Baratelli2,5, Jorge Martínez2,6, Lourdes Migura-Garcia2, Lorena Córdoba2, Mónica Pérez2, Inmaculada Casas7, Francisco Pozo7, Lorenzo Fraile8, Natàlia Majó2,6, María Montoya2,9.
Abstract
Oseltamivir is a common therapy against influenza A virus (IAV) infections. The acquisition of oseltamivir resistance (OR) mutations, such as H275Y, hampers viral fitness. However, OR H1N1 viruses have demonstrated the ability to spread throughout different populations. The objective of this work was to compare the fitness of two strains of OR (R6 and R7) containing the H275Y mutation, and a wild-type (F) pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 (pdm09) virus both in vitro and in vivo in mice and to select one OR strain for a comparison with F in ferrets. R6 showed faster replication and pathogenicity than R7 in vitro and in mice. Subsequently, R6 was selected for the fitness comparison with the F strain in ferrets. Ferrets infected with the F virus showed more severe clinical signs, histopathological lung lesions, and viral quantification when compared to OR R6-infected animals. More importantly, differential viral kinetics correlated with differential pro-inflammatory host immune responses in the lungs of infected ferrets, where OR-infected animals developed a protective higher expression of type I IFN and Retinoid acid Inducible Gene I (RIG-I) genes early after infection, resulting in the development of milder disease. These results suggest the presence of early specific viral-host immune interactions relevant in the development of influenza-associated lung pathology.Entities:
Keywords: immunopathology; influenza; oseltamivir; pH1N1; pneumonia; resistance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32721992 PMCID: PMC7472233 DOI: 10.3390/v12080794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1In vitro virus kinetics of pdm09 OR viruses (R6 and R7) were compared with a non-resistance pdm09 virus (F) and the viral titer was determined at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post-infection (hpi) by a plaque assay (A) and by 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) (B).
Figure 2Influence on body weight (A), survival (B), (C) virus load in lungs, and (D) antibody response by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) in pdm09 oseltamivir resistance (OR)-infected mice. Groups of 20 mice were distributed as follows: Control group, R6-infected mice, and R7-infected mice. All values are the mean ± SEM of one experiment. (B) shows the percentage of survival of R6- and R7-infected groups. (C,D) exhibit individual values for each tested animal and the mean is represented by bars.
Figure 3Histopathology of lung lesions in mice. (A) Histopathologic scoring of lung tissues examined. Individual values per animal with means represented by bars. (B) Control animals did not present any histopathological lesions at any time point. At 3 dpi, only one R7-infected mouse presented histopathological lesions consistent with bronchiolitis (C). At 5 dpi, all R6-infected mice presented with severe broncho-interstitial pneumonia (D). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain (10× objective field).
Aminoacidic sequence comparison of the F and R6 strains. Aminoacidic differences between the two strains. Mutation frequency and the domain into which they fall were also annotated.
| Protein | Portion Compared | Mutated Position | F | R6 | Frequency | Domain | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1-757 | 127 | Y | H | 127H 98.8% (1837) | N-terminal-PB1,NP interaction | [ |
| 191 | K | E | 191E 97.5% (1812) | ||||
| 221 | T | A | 221A 99.7% (1854) | ||||
| 660 | K | R | 660R 2.5% (47) | 627Domain – host range | [ | ||
|
| 1-757 | 257 | T | A | 257A 0.5% (10) | Nucleotide binding site | [ |
|
| 1-11 TRUNCATED | - | |||||
|
| 1-716 | 328 | R | K | 328K 99.8% (1855) | PB1 interaction | |
| 529 | N | D | 529D 99.8% (1855) | [ | |||
| 716 | K | E | 716E 0.5% (9) | ||||
|
| 2-497 | 400 | R | K | 400K 98.8% (1836) | Body | [ |
|
| 34-349 | 38 | E | K | 38K 0.1% (1) | Fusion HA1 chain | [ |
| 127 | L | S | 127S 99.8% (1860) | Receptor binding HA1 chain | |||
|
| 188-420 | 275 | H | Y | 275Y 0.8% (14) | Head domain | [ |
|
| 1-252 | - | |||||
|
| 1-97 | - | |||||
|
| 1-219 | 93 | M | I | 93I 2.2% (40) | N/A | |
|
| 1-121 | - |
Figure 4Clinical signs, APP’s levels, and antibody responses in ferrets. (A) Clinical score; (B) percentage of weight compared with weight at 0 dpi (100%); (C) body temperature; (D) SAA sera levels; (E) haptoglobin (Hp) sera levels. All values are represented by the mean and SEM ±. Statistically significant differences are represented by * (p value < 0.05). (F) Antibody response by HI.
Figure 5Histopathology of lung lesions and viral identification by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in ferrets. (A) Histopathological scores representing lung lesion severity. Individual values per animal with means represented by bars; (B) healthy lung in a control animal; (C) necrotizing bronchiolitis in one ferret infected with the R6 virus; and (D) diffuse alveolar damage in one animal infected with the F virus. (E) IAV-positive cells located in the bronchiolar epithelium in one animal infected with the R6 virus and (F) IAV-positive cells by IHC located in the alveolar septa in one ferret infected with the F virus. Images correspond to HE and immunohistochemical staining for the IAV antigen (20× objective field).
Figure 6Viral quantification by PCR and IHC antigen cell accounts in ferrets. (A) Nasal swab viral shedding. Values represented as PFU/mL. (B) IAV rRT-PCR in the lungs. Values represented as inverted threshold cycle (Ct) values. (C) Immunohistochemical cell quantification of IAV-positive cells in bronchiol/bronchiolar areas. (D) Immunohistochemical cell quantification of IAV-positive cells in alveolar areas. Individual values per animal with means represented by bars.
Figure 7Cytokines and pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) quantification in the lungs of ferrets. Comparisons of the gene expression levels in lungs at 1 and 3 dpi by rRT-PCR. Gene expressions of IFNα, IFNβ, IFNγ and RIG-I, TNFα, CXCL10, IL-6, and IL-8. Individual values per animal with means represented by bars. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups.