Literature DB >> 24155392

Evolution of the influenza A virus genome during development of oseltamivir resistance in vitro.

Nicholas Renzette1, Daniel R Caffrey, Konstantin B Zeldovich, Ping Liu, Glen R Gallagher, Daniel Aiello, Alyssa J Porter, Evelyn A Kurt-Jones, Daniel N Bolon, Yu-Ping Poh, Jeffrey D Jensen, Celia A Schiffer, Timothy F Kowalik, Robert W Finberg, Jennifer P Wang.   

Abstract

Influenza A virus (IAV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Current antiviral therapies include oseltamivir, a neuraminidase inhibitor that prevents the release of nascent viral particles from infected cells. However, the IAV genome can evolve rapidly, and oseltamivir resistance mutations have been detected in numerous clinical samples. Using an in vitro evolution platform and whole-genome population sequencing, we investigated the population genomics of IAV during the development of oseltamivir resistance. Strain A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1) was grown in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells with or without escalating concentrations of oseltamivir over serial passages. Following drug treatment, the H274Y resistance mutation fixed reproducibly within the population. The presence of the H274Y mutation in the viral population, at either a low or a high frequency, led to measurable changes in the neuraminidase inhibition assay. Surprisingly, fixation of the resistance mutation was not accompanied by alterations of viral population diversity or differentiation, and oseltamivir did not alter the selective environment. While the neighboring K248E mutation was also a target of positive selection prior to H274Y fixation, H274Y was the primary beneficial mutation in the population. In addition, once evolved, the H274Y mutation persisted after the withdrawal of the drug, even when not fixed in viral populations. We conclude that only selection of H274Y is required for oseltamivir resistance and that H274Y is not deleterious in the absence of the drug. These collective results could offer an explanation for the recent reproducible rise in oseltamivir resistance in seasonal H1N1 IAV strains in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24155392      PMCID: PMC3911755          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01067-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  26 in total

1.  Oseltamivir resistance--disabling our influenza defenses.

Authors:  Anne Moscona
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Presence of oseltamivir-resistant pandemic A/H1N1 minor variants before drug therapy with subsequent selection and transmission.

Authors:  Elodie Ghedin; Edward C Holmes; Jay V DePasse; Lady Tatiana Pinilla; Adam Fitch; Marie-Eve Hamelin; Jesse Papenburg; Guy Boivin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Permissive secondary mutations enable the evolution of influenza oseltamivir resistance.

Authors:  Jesse D Bloom; Lizhi Ian Gong; David Baltimore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Quasispecies of hepatitis C virus in serum and in three different parts of the liver of patients with chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  A Sakai; S Kaneko; M Honda; E Matsushita; K Kobayashi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Avian flu: isolation of drug-resistant H5N1 virus.

Authors:  Q Mai Le; Maki Kiso; Kazuhiko Someya; Yuko T Sakai; T Hien Nguyen; Khan H L Nguyen; N Dinh Pham; Ha H Ngyen; Shinya Yamada; Yukiko Muramoto; Taisuke Horimoto; Ayato Takada; Hideo Goto; Takashi Suzuki; Yasuo Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kawaoka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Segment self-repulsion is the major driving force of influenza genome packaging.

Authors:  Sergey V Venev; Konstantin B Zeldovich
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Comparison of the mutation rates of human influenza A and B viruses.

Authors:  Eri Nobusawa; Katsuhiko Sato
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 8.  Influenza virus susceptibility and resistance to oseltamivir.

Authors:  Fred Y Aoki; Guy Boivin; Noel Roberts
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2007

Review 9.  Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F(ST).

Authors:  Kent E Holsinger; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Infections with oseltamivir-resistant influenza A(H1N1) virus in the United States.

Authors:  Nila J Dharan; Larisa V Gubareva; John J Meyer; Margaret Okomo-Adhiambo; Reginald C McClinton; Steven A Marshall; Kirsten St George; Scott Epperson; Lynnette Brammer; Alexander I Klimov; Joseph S Bresee; Alicia M Fry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Merging molecular mechanism and evolution: theory and computation at the interface of biophysics and evolutionary population genetics.

Authors:  Adrian W R Serohijos; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Inferring Demography and Selection in Organisms Characterized by Skewed Offspring Distributions.

Authors:  Andrew M Sackman; Rebecca B Harris; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Turnover and accumulation of genetic diversity across large time-scale cycles of isolation and connection of populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Séverine Vuilleumier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Efficacy of a ML336 derivative against Venezuelan and eastern equine encephalitis viruses.

Authors:  Colleen B Jonsson; Xufeng Cao; Jasper Lee; Jon D Gabbard; Yong-Kyu Chu; Elizabeth A Fitzpatrick; Justin Julander; Dong-Hoon Chung; Jennifer Stabenow; Jennifer E Golden
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2019-04-07       Impact factor: 5.970

5.  An Approximate Markov Model for the Wright-Fisher Diffusion and Its Application to Time Series Data.

Authors:  Anna Ferrer-Admetlla; Christoph Leuenberger; Jeffrey D Jensen; Daniel Wegmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Positive Selection Drives Preferred Segment Combinations during Influenza Virus Reassortment.

Authors:  Konstantin B Zeldovich; Ping Liu; Nicholas Renzette; Matthieu Foll; Serena T Pham; Sergey V Venev; Glen R Gallagher; Daniel N Bolon; Evelyn A Kurt-Jones; Jeffrey D Jensen; Daniel R Caffrey; Celia A Schiffer; Timothy F Kowalik; Jennifer P Wang; Robert W Finberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Pharmacological Characterization of the Spectrum of Antiviral Activity and Genetic Barrier to Drug Resistance of M2-S31N Channel Blockers.

Authors:  Chunlong Ma; Jiantao Zhang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  The Path of Least Resistance: Mechanisms to Reduce Influenza's Sensitivity to Oseltamivir.

Authors:  Angela M Phillips; Matthew D Shoulders
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Mutations in Influenza A Virus Neuraminidase and Hemagglutinin Confer Resistance against a Broadly Neutralizing Hemagglutinin Stem Antibody.

Authors:  Kristina L Prachanronarong; Aneth S Canale; Ping Liu; Mohan Somasundaran; Shurong Hou; Yu-Ping Poh; Thomas Han; Quan Zhu; Nicholas Renzette; Konstantin B Zeldovich; Timothy F Kowalik; Nese Kurt-Yilmaz; Jeffrey D Jensen; Daniel N A Bolon; Wayne A Marasco; Robert W Finberg; Celia A Schiffer; Jennifer P Wang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 10.  Insights on recent approaches in drug discovery strategies and untapped drug targets against drug resistance.

Authors:  Ramalingam Peraman; Sathish Kumar Sure; V N Azger Dusthackeer; Naresh Babu Chilamakuru; Padmanabha Reddy Yiragamreddy; Chiranjeevi Pokuri; Vinay Kumar Kutagulla; Santhivardhan Chinni
Journal:  Futur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2021-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.