Literature DB >> 3272131

Comparisons of ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial populations in bison and cattle.

G Towne1, T G Nagaraja, R C Cochran, D L Harmon, C E Owensby, D W Kaufman.   

Abstract

Ruminal microbial populations, fermentation characteristics, digestibility, and liquid flow rates in two ruminally cannulated bison and two ruminally cannulated Hereford steers fed a prairie hay diet were compared. No significant differences in anaerobic bacterial counts, volatile fatty acid concentrations, or ruminal pHs were evident between bison and cattle. Also, no significant differences in neutral detergent fiber digestibility, indigestible fiber retention time, or intake were detected between bison and cattle, although cattle had higher levels (P less than 0.08) of ruminal dry matter and indigestible fiber than bison. Bison had a smaller (P = .02) ruminoreticular volume, faster liquid dilution rates, and faster liquid turnover times than cattle. The average ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentration was higher (P = 0.02) in bison (1.17 mg/dl) than in cattle (0.79 mg/dl). Total ciliate protozoal counts and cell volume were greater (P = 0.07) in bison (32.8 x 10(4)/g and 407.1 x 10(-4) ml/g, respectively) than in cattle (15.7 x 10(4)/g and 162.2 x 10(-4) ml/g, respectively). Bison harbored higher (P less than 0.02) numbers of Dasytricha spp., Eudiplodinium maggii, Eudiplodinium bursa, and Epidinium spp. than cattle and possessed a type B protozoan population. The cattle possessed a mixed type A-type B population that was characterized by Ophryoscolex spp. and Polyplastron spp. in association with low concentrations of Epidinium spp. and Eudiplodinium maggii.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3272131      PMCID: PMC204300          DOI: 10.1128/aem.54.10.2510-2514.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  15 in total

1.  Effect of increased levels of urea in the diet on ruminal protozoal counts in four ruminant species.

Authors:  A M Nour; A R Abou Akkada; K el-Shazly; M A Naga; B E Borhami; M A Abaza
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Studies on the Nitrogen Requirements of Some Ruminal Cellulolytic Bacteria.

Authors:  M P Bryant; I M Robinson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1961-03

3.  Rumen microorganisms in buffalo from southern utah.

Authors:  H A Pearson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1967-11

4.  Variation in colony counts of total viable anaerobic rumen bacteria as influenced by media and cultural methods.

Authors:  J A Grubb; B A Dehority
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Studies on the ecology of certain rumen ciliate protozoa.

Authors:  J M Eadie
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1967-11

6.  Passage of protozoa and volatile fatty acids from the rumen of the sheep and from a continuous in vitro fermentation system.

Authors:  R A Weller; A F Pilgrim
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Ciliate protozoa in the rumen of Brazilian water buffalo, Bubalus bubalis Linnaeus.

Authors:  B A Dehority
Journal:  J Protozool       Date:  1979-11

8.  Ration digestion and retention times of digesta in domestic cattle (Bos taurus), American bison (Bison bison), and Tibetan yak (Bos grunniens).

Authors:  A L Schaefer; B A Young; A M Chimwano
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.597

9.  Seasonal changes in the ruminal microflora of the high-arctic Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus).

Authors:  C G Orpin; S D Mathiesen; Y Greenwood; A S Blix
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Sequestration of holotrich protozoa in the reticulo-rumen of cattle.

Authors:  M Abe; T Iriki; N Tobe; H Shibui
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  8 in total

1.  Ruminal microbial populations and fermentation characteristics in bison and cattle fed high- and low-quality forage.

Authors:  G Towne; T G Nagaraja; R C Cochran
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  A survey of the fecal bacteria of bison (Bison bison) for potential pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility of bison-origin E. coli.

Authors:  Murray R Woodbury; Manuel Chirino-Trejo
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Occurrence and diurnal population fluctuations of the ruminal protozoan Microcetus lappus.

Authors:  G Towne; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Synergism of Cattle and Bison Inoculum on Ruminal Fermentation and Select Bacterial Communities in an Artificial Rumen (Rusitec) Fed a Barley Straw Based Diet.

Authors:  Daniela B Oss; Gabriel O Ribeiro; Marcos I Marcondes; WenZhu Yang; Karen A Beauchemin; Robert J Forster; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Microbial community composition along the digestive tract in forage- and grain-fed bison.

Authors:  Gaddy T Bergmann
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Repeated inoculation of cattle rumen with bison rumen contents alters the rumen microbiome and improves nitrogen digestibility in cattle.

Authors:  Gabriel O Ribeiro; Daniela B Oss; Zhixiong He; Robert J Gruninger; Chijioke Elekwachi; Robert J Forster; WenZhu Yang; Karen A Beauchemin; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  An Investigation into Rumen Fungal and Protozoal Diversity in Three Rumen Fractions, during High-Fiber or Grain-Induced Sub-Acute Ruminal Acidosis Conditions, with or without Active Dry Yeast Supplementation.

Authors:  Suzanne L Ishaq; Ousama AlZahal; Nicola Walker; Brian McBride
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  The fecal microbiota of semi-free-ranging wood bison (Bison bison athabascae).

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Todd Shury; Murray D Jelinski
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.741

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.