Literature DB >> 24197289

Ruminal microbial populations and fermentation characteristics in bison and cattle fed high- and low-quality forage.

G Towne1, T G Nagaraja, R C Cochran.   

Abstract

Ruminal microbial populations and fermentation products were compared between two ruminally cannulated bison (375 kg) and two ruminally cannulated Hereford steers (567 kg) on alfalfa or prairie hay diets. Differential media were used to enumerate carbohydrate-specific bacterial subgroups. Voluntary dry matter intake was higher (P=0.006) for cattle than for bison fed alfalfa, but prairie hay intake was not different (P=0.16) between the two species. Volatile fatty acid concentrations, pH, and ruminal ammonia were similar between bison and cattle on both diets. Total anaerobic bacteria and xylanolytic bacterial counts were higher (P<0.02) in bison than in cattle fed alfalfa. However, with the prairie hay diet, no differences in bacterial counts on any medium were observed between ruminant species. Both bison and cattle possessed a mixed A-B protozoan population with nearly identical protozoan numbers and distribution of genera. The similarities between bison and cattle consuming either high-or low-quality forage suggest that any differences in putative forage digestibility between the species are not due to differences in microbial counts.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 24197289     DOI: 10.1007/BF02012843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  10 in total

1.  Studies on the Nitrogen Requirements of Some Ruminal Cellulolytic Bacteria.

Authors:  M P Bryant; I M Robinson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1961-03

2.  Microcetus lappus gen. nov., sp. nov.: new species of ciliated protozoon from the bovine rumen.

Authors:  C G Orpin; S D Mathiesen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the "most probable number".

Authors:  W G COCHRAN
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  An improved method for determining celluloytic activity in anerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S O Mann
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1968-06

5.  Studies on the ecology of certain rumen ciliate protozoa.

Authors:  J M Eadie
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1967-11

6.  Comparisons of ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial populations in bison and cattle.

Authors:  G Towne; T G Nagaraja; R C Cochran; D L Harmon; C E Owensby; D W Kaufman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Ruminal ciliated protozoa in bison.

Authors:  G Towne; T G Nagaraja; K K Kemp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Rumen microbial changes in cattle fed diets with or without salinomycin.

Authors:  D B Olumeyan; T G Nagaraja; G W Miller; R A Frey; J E Boyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Seasonal changes in the ruminal microflora of the high-arctic Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus).

Authors:  C G Orpin; S D Mathiesen; Y Greenwood; A S Blix
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Ruminal microbial development in conventionally or early-weaned calves.

Authors:  K L Anderson; T G Nagaraja; J L Morrill; T B Avery; S J Galitzer; J E Boyer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.159

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Microbial community composition along the digestive tract in forage- and grain-fed bison.

Authors:  Gaddy T Bergmann
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  The fecal microbiota of semi-free-ranging wood bison (Bison bison athabascae).

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Todd Shury; Murray D Jelinski
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.741

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.