| Literature DB >> 32717832 |
Beatriz R Martins1, Yanne O Barbosa1, Cristhianne M R Andrade2, Loren Q Pereira2, Guilherme F Simão3, Carlo J de Oliveira1,2, Dalmo Correia2, Robson T S Oliveira1, Marcos V da Silva2, Anielle C A Silva4, Noelio O Dantas4, Virmondes Rodrigues1,2, Rodrigo A A Muñoz5, Renata P Alves-Balvedi1,6.
Abstract
Visceral leishmaniasis is a reemerging neglected tropical disease with limitations for its diagnosis, including low concentration of antibodies in the serum of asymptomatic patients and cross-reactions. In this context, this work proposes an electrochemical immunosensor for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in a more sensitive way that is capable of avoiding cross-reaction with Chagas disease (CD). Crude Leishmania infantum antigens tested in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were methodologically standardized to best engage to the sensor. The antibodies anti-Trypanosoma cruzi and anti-Leishmania sp. Present in serum from patients with diverse types of CD or leishmaniasis were chosen. A screen-printed carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles was the best platform to guarantee effective adsorption of all antigens so that the epitope of specific recognition for leishmaniasis occurred efficiently and without cross-reaction with the evaluated CD. The current peaks reduced linearly after the recognition, and still were able to notice the discrimination between different kinds of diseases (digestive, cardiac, undetermined Chagas/acute and visceral chronic leishmaniasis). Comparative analyses with ELISA were performed with the same groups, and a low specificity (44%) was verified due to cross-reactions (high number of false positives) on ELISA tests, while the proposed immunosensor presented high selectivity and specificity (100%) without any false positives or false negatives for the serum samples from isolated patients with different types of CD and visceral leishmaniasis. Furthermore, the biosensor was stable for 5 days and presented a detection limit of 200 ng mL-1.Entities:
Keywords: Chagas disease; electrochemical biosensor; gold nanoparticles; point-of-care; portable analysis; visceral leishmaniasis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32717832 PMCID: PMC7460044 DOI: 10.3390/bios10080081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Scheme of the carbon immunosensor using a gold-modified electrode. The surface antigen probe was autonomized as presented in a voltammogram. The steps of preparation of the immunosensor are as follows: (a) the carbon electrode was selected as the base platform; (b) carbon was electrodeposited with gold nanoparticles; (c) the Leishmania infantum antigen was immobilized on the gold nanoparticle-modified surface; (d) the 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) blocking solution was coupled to the platform as a blocking solution; (e) I after the preparations, the antibodies were coupled (real sample/serum); and (f) at the end, the electroanalytical solution was inserted and the process of transduction was initiated.
Figure 2Column graphs extracted from cyclic voltammetry (CV) shows the variation of current peak percentages for (a) after immobilization of total soluble antigen followed by the addition of BSA, (b) after addition of Chagas disease (CD) antibodies, and (c) after addition of visceral leishmaniasis antibodies. The percentages were calculated from initial CV (without biomolecule) counting 100%. (A) Screen-printed carbon electrode used as a platform. (B) Screen-printed gold electrode used as a platform. The data are oxidation in blue and reduction in red. The electrochemical probe was 5 mmol L−1 [Fe (CN)6]4−/[Fe (CN) 6]3− and scan rate was 100 mV s−1.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammograms for the redox probe on the carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles that were electrodeposited and antigens; bar plots show the variation of peak current percentages. (A) Immunosensor (a), pool Chagas serum (b), pool visceral leishmaniarum (c). (B) Immunosensor (a) and different clinical forms by CD: Chagas serum pool (b), cardiac Chagas serum (c), digestive Chagas serum (d), Chagas undetermined serum (e). (C) Pool of total visceral leishmaniasis (a), pool of acute visceral leishmaniasis (b), pool of chronic visceral leishmaniasis (c), antigen Leishmania infantum + BSA1% (d), pool negative for leishmaniasis (e). The changes in the electrochemical signals of [Fe (CN)6]4−/[Fe (CN)6]3− (5 mM) were evaluated (scan rate of 100 mV s−1).
Figure 4Calibration curve obtained from current peak percentages for triplicate measurements of the biosensors in the presence of diluted serum (1:25, 1:50, 1:100, 1:250, and 1:100,000) containing antibodies (stock serum solution of 20.2 mg mL−1). The percentages were calculated from initial CV (without biomolecule) counting 100%. The changes in the electrochemical signals of [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN) 6]3− (5 mM) were evaluated (scan rate of 100 mV s−1).
Figure 5(A) Distribution of ELISA index (EI) values obtained by indirect ELISA (data from Table S1), with a line at EI = 1.4 to guide the reader (values above 1.4 are considered positive for the tests), for serum samples from patients with different types of diseases. (B) EI values (ELISA) and percentage current (proposed immunosensor) obtained for the same serum samples of different diseases (acute and chronic visceral leishmaniasis; cardiac, digestive, and indeterminate Chagas; and a pool of all). Current values below the black dotted line indicate positive tests for leishmaniasis, while current values above the red dotted line indicate negative tests.
Results of research conducted on patients with the aim of finding an efficient diagnosis of leishmaniasis.
| Method | Material | Sensitivity/Specificity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFAT | Serum | 88–92%/83–88% | [ |
| Kalazar Detect | Serum | 84–88.1%/91% | [ |
| IT LEISHBio-Rad | Blood/Serum | 92–93%/92–98% | [ |
| PCR | Blood | 93%/96% | [ |
| DAT-LPC | Blood | 99%/98% | [ |
| RIFI | Serum | 0–100%/80% | [ |
| Immunochromatographic tests | Serum | 87%/94% | [ |
| ELISA | Serum | 80–99%/81–100% | [ |
| Electrochemical | DNA extracted of blood | Not explained | [ |
| ELISA | Serum | 92.3%/44% | This work |
| Electrochemical | Serum | 100%/100% | This work |