Literature DB >> 2926087

Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with fresh foods and commercial food extracts) and RAST in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome.

C Ortolani1, M Ispano, E A Pastorello, R Ansaloni, G C Magri.   

Abstract

One hundred adult patients with a history of oral allergy syndrome (OAS) after ingestion of fruits and vegetables, 77 patients with hay fever and 13 with skin prick tests and RAST positive to pollens but without seasonal symptoms, and 32 normal nonallergic control subjects, had Phadebas RAST and skin prick tests with commercial extracts (CSPT) and with fresh foods (FFSPT) to assess the reliability of these three tests. Sensitivity was better with FFSPT for carrot, celery, cherry, apple, tomato, orange, and peach; better with CSPT for peanut, pea, and walnut; and better with RAST for hazelnut. Specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the three tests were determined for apple, carrot, hazelnut, orange, pea, peanut, and tomato. Specificity in the patient groups ranged between 40% (pea) and 100% (apple) for CSPT, between 61% (peanut) and 87% (carrot) for RAST, and between 42% (carrot) and 93% (peanut) for FFSPT. However, all tests were negative in the control group. Thus, false positive results may result from cross-reactivity with pollen allergens. The diagnostic accuracy of these tests in the population with OAS proved comparable for peanut, carrot, hazelnut, and pea. FFSPT proved more sensitive than CSPT or RAST in confirming a history of OAS to certain alimentary allergens, such as apple, orange, tomato, carrot, cherry, celery, and peach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2926087     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90083-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  30 in total

Review 1.  Anaphylaxis and food allergy.

Authors:  A W Burks; H A Sampson
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Update on food allergy in adults.

Authors:  Rabia Quddus Chaudhry; John J Oppenheimer
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Diagnosis of food allergy: epicutaneous skin tests, in vitro tests, and oral food challenge.

Authors:  Jay A Lieberman; Scott H Sicherer
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  Skin testing and food challenges in allergy and immunology practice.

Authors:  L W Williams; S A Bock
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 5.  Food allergy in gastroenterologic diseases: Review of literature.

Authors:  Pasquale Mansueto; Giuseppe Montalto; Maria-Luisa Pacor; Maria Esposito-Pellitteri; Vito Ditta; Claudia Lo Bianco; Stefania-Maria Leto-Barone; Gabriele Di Lorenzo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Oral allergy syndrome.

Authors:  Scott Nash; A Wesley Burks
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.806

7.  Management of the patient with multiple food allergies.

Authors:  Julie Wang
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.806

8.  Food allergy in adults: an over- or underrated problem?

Authors:  Cornelia S Seitz; Petra Pfeuffer; Petra Raith; Eva-B Bröcker; Axel Trautmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Detection of IgE, IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies against raw and processed food antigens.

Authors:  Aristo Vojdani
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 4.169

10.  Diagnostic evaluation of food-related allergic diseases.

Authors:  John Eckman; Sarbjit S Saini; Robert G Hamilton
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.