Literature DB >> 32716917

Machine learning for modeling animal movement.

Dhanushi A Wijeyakulasuriya1, Elizabeth W Eisenhauer1, Benjamin A Shaby2, Ephraim M Hanks1.   

Abstract

Animal movement drives important ecological processes such as migration and the spread of infectious disease. Current approaches to modeling animal tracking data focus on parametric models used to understand environmental effects on movement behavior and to fill in missing tracking data. Machine Learning and Deep learning algorithms are powerful and flexible predictive modeling tools but have rarely been applied to animal movement data. In this study we present a general framework for predicting animal movement that is a combination of two steps: first predicting movement behavioral states and second predicting the animal's velocity. We specify this framework at the individual level as well as for collective movement. We use Random Forests, Neural and Recurrent Neural Networks to compare performance predicting one step ahead as well as long range simulations. We compare results against a custom constructed Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE) model. We apply this approach to high resolution ant movement data. We found that the individual level Machine Learning and Deep Learning methods outperformed the SDE model for one step ahead prediction. The SDE model did comparatively better at simulating long range movement behaviour. Of the Machine Learning and Deep Learning models the Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) individual level model did best at long range simulations. We also applied the Random Forest and LSTM individual level models to model gull migratory movement to demonstrate the generalizability of this framework. Machine Learning and deep learning models are easier to specify compared to traditional parametric movement models which can have restrictive assumptions. However, machine learning and deep learning models are less interpretable than parametric movement models. The type of model used should be determined by the goal of the study, if the goal is prediction, our study provides evidence that machine learning and deep learning models could be useful tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32716917      PMCID: PMC7384613          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  15 in total

1.  Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure.

Authors:  André Altmann; Laura Toloşi; Oliver Sander; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A general framework for the analysis of animal resource selection from telemetry data.

Authors:  Devin S Johnson; Dana L Thomas; Jay M Ver Hoef; Aaron Christ
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean.

Authors:  B A Block; I D Jonsen; S J Jorgensen; A J Winship; S A Shaffer; S J Bograd; E L Hazen; D G Foley; G A Breed; A-L Harrison; J E Ganong; A Swithenbank; M Castleton; H Dewar; B R Mate; G L Shillinger; K M Schaefer; S R Benson; M J Weise; R W Henry; D P Costa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Supervised accelerometry analysis can identify prey capture by penguins at sea.

Authors:  Gemma Carroll; David Slip; Ian Jonsen; Rob Harcourt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures.

Authors:  Ran Nathan; Orr Spiegel; Scott Fortmann-Roe; Roi Harel; Martin Wikelski; Wayne M Getz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Linking resource selection and step selection models for habitat preferences in animals.

Authors:  Théo Michelot; Paul G Blackwell; Jason Matthiopoulos
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Using satellite tracking to optimize protection of long-lived marine species: olive ridley sea turtle conservation in Central Africa.

Authors:  Sara M Maxwell; Greg A Breed; Barry A Nickel; Junior Makanga-Bahouna; Edgard Pemo-Makaya; Richard J Parnell; Angela Formia; Solange Ngouessono; Brendan J Godley; Daniel P Costa; Matthew J Witt; Michael S Coyne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Movement activity based classification of animal behaviour with an application to data from cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus).

Authors:  Steffen Grünewälder; Femke Broekhuis; David Whyte Macdonald; Alan Martin Wilson; John Weldon McNutt; John Shawe-Taylor; Stephen Hailes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Identification of yeast transcriptional regulation networks using multivariate random forests.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Xiao; Mark R Segal
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Conditional variable importance for random forests.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Thomas Kneib; Thomas Augustin; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Semi-automatic detection of honeybee brood hygiene-an example of artificial learning to facilitate ethological studies on social insects.

Authors:  Philipp Batz; Andreas Ruttor; Sebastian Thiel; Jakob Wegener; Fred Zautke; Christoph Schwekendiek; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  Biol Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 2.  Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation.

Authors:  Devis Tuia; Benjamin Kellenberger; Sara Beery; Blair R Costelloe; Silvia Zuffi; Benjamin Risse; Alexander Mathis; Mackenzie W Mathis; Frank van Langevelde; Tilo Burghardt; Roland Kays; Holger Klinck; Martin Wikelski; Iain D Couzin; Grant van Horn; Margaret C Crofoot; Charles V Stewart; Tanya Berger-Wolf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.