Literature DB >> 25394635

Supervised accelerometry analysis can identify prey capture by penguins at sea.

Gemma Carroll1, David Slip2, Ian Jonsen2, Rob Harcourt2.   

Abstract

Determining where, when and how much animals eat is fundamental to understanding their ecology. We developed a technique to identify a prey capture signature for little penguins from accelerometry, in order to quantify food intake remotely. We categorised behaviour of captive penguins from HD video and matched this to time-series data from back-mounted accelerometers. We then trained a support vector machine (SVM) to classify the penguins' behaviour at 0.3 s intervals as either 'prey handling' or 'swimming'. We applied this model to accelerometer data collected from foraging wild penguins to identify prey capture events. We compared prey capture and non-prey capture dives to test the model predictions against foraging theory. The SVM had an accuracy of 84.95±0.26% (mean ± s.e.) and a false positive rate of 9.82±0.24% when tested on unseen captive data. For wild data, we defined three independent, consecutive prey handling observations as representing true prey capture, with a false positive rate of 0.09%. Dives with prey captures had longer duration and bottom times, were deeper, had faster ascent rates, and had more 'wiggles' and 'dashes' (proxies for prey encounter used in other studies). The mean (±s.e.) number of prey captures per foraging trip was 446.6±66.28. By recording the behaviour of captive animals on HD video and using a supervised machine learning approach, we show that accelerometry signatures can classify the behaviour of wild animals at unprecedentedly fine scales.
© 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energetics; Eudyptula minor; Feeding; Foraging ecology; Machine learning; Penguin; Predation; Support vector machine

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25394635     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.113076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  22 in total

1.  The influence of preceding dive cycles on the foraging decisions of Antarctic fur seals.

Authors:  T Iwata; K Q Sakamoto; E W J Edwards; I J Staniland; P N Trathan; Y Goto; K Sato; Y Naito; A Takahashi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Machine learning for modeling animal movement.

Authors:  Dhanushi A Wijeyakulasuriya; Elizabeth W Eisenhauer; Benjamin A Shaby; Ephraim M Hanks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research.

Authors:  Hannah J Williams; Lucy A Taylor; Simon Benhamou; Allert I Bijleveld; Thomas A Clay; Sophie de Grissac; Urška Demšar; Holly M English; Novella Franconi; Agustina Gómez-Laich; Rachael C Griffiths; William P Kay; Juan Manuel Morales; Jonathan R Potts; Katharine F Rogerson; Christian Rutz; Anouk Spelt; Alice M Trevail; Rory P Wilson; Luca Börger
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Recent prey capture experience and dynamic habitat quality mediate short-term foraging site fidelity in a seabird.

Authors:  Gemma Carroll; Robert Harcourt; Benjamin J Pitcher; David Slip; Ian Jonsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras.

Authors:  Beth L Volpov; Andrew J Hoskins; Brian C Battaile; Morgane Viviant; Kathryn E Wheatley; Greg Marshall; Kyler Abernathy; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dive characteristics can predict foraging success in Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) as validated by animal-borne video.

Authors:  Beth L Volpov; David A S Rosen; Andrew J Hoskins; Holly J Lourie; Nicole Dorville; Alastair M M Baylis; Kathryn E Wheatley; Greg Marshall; Kyler Abernathy; Jayson Semmens; Mark A Hindell; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  High sea surface temperatures driven by a strengthening current reduce foraging success by penguins.

Authors:  Gemma Carroll; Jason D Everett; Robert Harcourt; David Slip; Ian Jonsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Seeing It All: Evaluating Supervised Machine Learning Methods for the Classification of Diverse Otariid Behaviours.

Authors:  Monique A Ladds; Adam P Thompson; David J Slip; David P Hocking; Robert G Harcourt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Putting the behavior into animal movement modeling: Improved activity budgets from use of ancillary tag information.

Authors:  Sophie Bestley; Ian Jonsen; Robert G Harcourt; Mark A Hindell; Nicholas J Gales
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Interpreting behaviors from accelerometry: a method combining simplicity and objectivity.

Authors:  Philip M Collins; Jonathan A Green; Victoria Warwick-Evans; Stephen Dodd; Peter J A Shaw; John P Y Arnould; Lewis G Halsey
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.