Literature DB >> 30047993

Linking resource selection and step selection models for habitat preferences in animals.

Théo Michelot1, Paul G Blackwell1, Jason Matthiopoulos2.   

Abstract

The two dominant approaches for the analysis of species-habitat associations in animals have been shown to reach divergent conclusions. Models fitted from the viewpoint of an individual (step selection functions), once scaled up, do not agree with models fitted from a population viewpoint (resource selection functions [RSFs]). We explain this fundamental incompatibility, and propose a solution by introducing to the animal movement field a novel use for the well-known family of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. By design, the step selection rules of MCMC lead to a steady-state distribution that coincides with a given underlying function: the target distribution. We therefore propose an analogy between the movements of an animal and the movements of an MCMC sampler, to guarantee convergence of the step selection rules to the parameters underlying the population's utilization distribution. We introduce a rejection-free MCMC algorithm, the local Gibbs sampler, that better resembles real animal movement, and discuss the wide range of biological assumptions that it can accommodate. We illustrate our method with simulations on a known utilization distribution, and show theoretically and empirically that locations simulated from the local Gibbs sampler give rise to the correct RSF. Using simulated data, we demonstrate how this framework can be used to estimate resource selection and movement parameters.
© 2018 The Authors Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov chain Monte Carlo; animal movement; habitat selection; resource selection function; space use; step selection function; utilization distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30047993     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

1.  Machine learning for modeling animal movement.

Authors:  Dhanushi A Wijeyakulasuriya; Elizabeth W Eisenhauer; Benjamin A Shaby; Ephraim M Hanks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Joseph M Northrup; Eric Vander Wal; Maegwin Bonar; John Fieberg; Michel P Laforge; Martin Leclerc; Christina M Prokopenko; Brian D Gerber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.105

3.  Analysis of local habitat selection and large-scale attraction/avoidance based on animal tracking data: is there a single best method?

Authors:  Moritz Mercker; Philipp Schwemmer; Verena Peschko; Leonie Enners; Stefan Garthe
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.600

Review 4.  Estimating the movements of terrestrial animal populations using broad-scale occurrence data.

Authors:  Sarah R Supp; Gil Bohrer; John Fieberg; Frank A La Sorte
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.600

5.  Flexible resource use strategies of a central-place forager experiencing dynamic risk and opportunity.

Authors:  Kira L Hefty; Kelley M Stewart
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.