Literature DB >> 32710671

Recruitment Challenges for Low-Risk Health System Intervention Trials in Older Adults: A Case Study.

Kathryn Anzuoni1, Terry S Field1,2, Kathleen M Mazor1,2, Yanhua Zhou1, Lawrence D Garber1,3, Alok Kapoor1,2, Jerry H Gurwitz1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with trial participation in the context of a low-risk intervention intended to reduce adverse drug events in recently hospitalized older adults.
DESIGN: Mixed methods: analysis of data collected during enrollment efforts and focus groups.
SETTING: A large, multispecialty group practice. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals 50 years and older, recently discharged from the hospital and prescribed at least one high-risk medication, were eligible for the trial. Enrollees, decliners, and their caregivers were eligible to participate in focus groups. MEASUREMENTS: Reasons for declining to participate during the initial invitation as well as reasons for not providing consent were recorded. Focus groups were conducted with eligible individuals to explore reasons for enrolling or declining. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to compare characteristics (including sex, age, healthcare proxy, number and type of medications, visiting nurse services, reason for admission, and length of hospital stay) of those who enrolled with those who did not enroll.
RESULTS: Of 3,606 individuals determined eligible, 3,147 (87%) declined, 98 (3%) verbally consented to participate but did not complete written consent, and 361 (10%) provided written consent and were considered enrolled. Individuals 80 year and older (odds ratio (OR) = 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30-0.65) and those with visiting nurse services (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.48-0.85) were least likely to enroll. Among those who provided a reason for declining (2,473), the most common was the belief they did not need additional medication assistance (18%). Another 332 (11%) declined because they were receiving visiting nurse services.
CONCLUSION: Recruiting older adults recently discharged from the hospital to participate in trials of low-risk, system-level interventions is challenging and may underenroll the oldest individuals and those potentially at the highest risk for adverse events, limiting generalizability of study findings. Alternative study designs may be more effective than individually randomized trials in assessing low-risk, system-level interventions.
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  care transitions; clinical trials; health system intervention; medication

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32710671      PMCID: PMC7722200          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  29 in total

1.  External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  Functional trajectories among older persons before and after critical illness.

Authors:  Lauren E Ferrante; Margaret A Pisani; Terrence E Murphy; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda S Leo-Summers; Thomas M Gill
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  Difficulties in recruiting older people in clinical trials: an examination of barriers and solutions.

Authors:  I Ridda; C R MacIntyre; R I Lindley; T C Tan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Target Validity and the Hierarchy of Study Designs.

Authors:  Daniel Westreich; Jessie K Edwards; Catherine R Lesko; Stephen R Cole; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Hospital-Associated Complications of Older People: A Proposed Multicomponent Outcome for Acute Care.

Authors:  Alison M Mudge; Prue McRae; Ruth E Hubbard; Nancye M Peel; Wen Kwang Lim; Adrian G Barnett; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Improving recruitment of older people to research through good practice.

Authors:  Marion E T McMurdo; Helen Roberts; Stuart Parker; Nikki Wyatt; Helen May; Claire Goodman; Stephen Jackson; John Gladman; Sinead O'Mahony; Khalid Ali; Edward Dickinson; Paul Edison; Chris Dyer
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  Screening, Recruitment, and Baseline Characteristics for the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) Study.

Authors:  Thomas M Gill; Joanne M McGloin; Nancy K Latham; Peter A Charpentier; Katy L Araujo; Eleni A Skokos; Charles Lu; Amy Shelton; Shalender Bhasin; Luanne M Bianco; Martha B Carnie; Kenneth E Covinsky; Patricia Dykes; Denise A Esserman; David A Ganz; Jerry H Gurwitz; Catherine Hanson; Linda V Nyquist; David B Reuben; Robert B Wallace; Erich J Greene
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Diagnoses and timing of 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia.

Authors:  Kumar Dharmarajan; Angela F Hsieh; Zhenqiu Lin; Héctor Bueno; Joseph S Ross; Leora I Horwitz; José Augusto Barreto-Filho; Nancy Kim; Susannah M Bernheim; Lisa G Suter; Elizabeth E Drye; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Why patients decline participation in an intervention to reduce re-hospitalization through patient activation: whom are we missing?

Authors:  Maria Flink; Carina Brandberg; Mirjam Ekstedt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.