Literature DB >> 32710366

Learning of association between a context and multiple possible target locations in a contextual cueing paradigm.

Chao Wang1,2, Xuejun Bai3, Yabo Hui3, Chen Song3, Guang Zhao3, Hanna Haponenko1, Bruce Milliken1, Hong-Jin Sun4.   

Abstract

Searching for a target is faster in a repeated context compared to a new context, possibly because the learned contextual information guides visual attention to the target location (attentional guidance). Previous studies showed that switching the target location following learning, or having the target appear in one of multiple possible locations during learning, fails to produce search facilitation in repeated contexts. In this study, we re-examined whether the learning of an association between a distractor configuration context and a target is limited to one-to-one context-target associations. Visual search response times were facilitated even when a repeated context was associated with one of four possible target locations, provided the target locations were also shared by other repeated distractor contexts. These results suggest that contextual cueing may involve mechanisms other than attentional guidance by one-to-one context-target associations.

Keywords:  Associative learning; Contextual cueing; Implicit learning; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32710366     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02090-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  12 in total

1.  Contextual cueing of visual attention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Investigating implicit statistical learning mechanisms through contextual cueing.

Authors:  Annabelle Goujon; André Didierjean; Simon Thorpe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts.

Authors:  James R Brockmole; Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Misleading contextual cues: how do they affect visual search?

Authors:  Angela A Manginelli; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-10

6.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

7.  Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.

Authors:  M M Chun; Y Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Is contextual cueing more than the guidance of visual-spatial attention?

Authors:  Andrea Schankin; Dirk Hagemann; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search.

Authors:  Tom Beesley; Miguel A Vadillo; Daniel Pearson; David R Shanks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Here today, gone tomorrow--adaptation to change in memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  Martina Zellin; Markus Conci; Adrian von Mühlenen; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Why Are Acquired Search-Guiding Context Memories Resistant to Updating?

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Werner Seitz; Artyom Zinchenko; Hermann J Müller; Markus Conci
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-01

2.  Stimulus-driven updating of long-term context memories in visual search.

Authors:  Markus Conci; Martina Zellin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.