Literature DB >> 33732200

Why Are Acquired Search-Guiding Context Memories Resistant to Updating?

Thomas Geyer1,2, Werner Seitz1,3, Artyom Zinchenko1, Hermann J Müller1,2, Markus Conci1.   

Abstract

Looking for goal-relevant objects in our various environments is one of the most ubiquitous tasks the human visual system has to accomplish (Wolfe, 1998). Visual search is guided by a number of separable selective-attention mechanisms that can be categorized as bottom-up driven - guidance by salient physical properties of the current stimuli - or top-down controlled - guidance by observers' "online" knowledge of search-critical object properties (e.g., Liesefeld and Müller, 2019). In addition, observers' expectations based on past experience also play also a significant role in goal-directed visual selection. Because sensory environments are typically stable, it is beneficial for the visual system to extract and learn the environmental regularities that are predictive of (the location of) the target stimulus. This perspective article is concerned with one of these predictive mechanisms: statistical context learning of consistent spatial patterns of target and distractor items in visual search. We review recent studies on context learning and its adaptability to incorporate consistent changes, with the aim to provide new directions to the study of processes involved in the acquisition of search-guiding context memories and their adaptation to consistent contextual changes - from a three-pronged, psychological, computational, and neurobiological perspective.
Copyright © 2021 Geyer, Seitz, Zinchenko, Müller and Conci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  associative learning; contextual cueing; memory systems; selective attention; spike-timing dependent plasticity; visual search

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732200      PMCID: PMC7956950          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  54 in total

Review 1.  The organization of recent and remote memories.

Authors:  Paul W Frankland; Bruno Bontempi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Statistical learning in the past modulates contextual cueing in the future.

Authors:  Martina Zellin; Adrian von Mühlenen; Hermann J Müller; Markus Conci
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Memory under pressure: secondary-task effects on contextual cueing of visual search.

Authors:  Efsun Annac; Angela A Manginelli; Stefan Pollmann; Zhuanghua Shi; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Geyer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations.

Authors:  Martina Zellin; Markus Conci; Adrian von Mühlenen; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Learning of association between a context and multiple possible target locations in a contextual cueing paradigm.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Xuejun Bai; Yabo Hui; Chen Song; Guang Zhao; Hanna Haponenko; Bruce Milliken; Hong-Jin Sun
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Taking Attention Out of Context: Frontopolar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Abolishes the Formation of New Context Memories in Visual Search.

Authors:  Artyom Zinchenko; Markus Conci; Paul C J Taylor; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Geyer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Here today, gone tomorrow--adaptation to change in memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  Martina Zellin; Markus Conci; Adrian von Mühlenen; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: at a tipping point?

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Anthony J Greene
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Task-based memory systems in contextual-cueing of visual search and explicit recognition.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Pardis Rostami; Lisa Sogerer; Bernhard Schlagbauer; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Task-Irrelevant Context Learned Under Rapid Display Presentation: Selective Attention in Associative Blocking.

Authors:  Xuelian Zang; Leonardo Assumpção; Jiao Wu; Xiaowei Xie; Artyom Zinchenko
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.