| Literature DB >> 32708959 |
Trung Q Le1, Vibhuthi Chandra2, Kahkashan Afrin2, Sanjay Srivatsa3, Satish Bukkapatnam2.
Abstract
Timely evaluation and reperfusion have improved the myocardial salvage and the subsequent recovery rate of the patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Long waiting time and time-consuming procedures of in-hospital diagnostic testing severely affect the timeliness. We present a Poincare pattern ensemble-based method with the consideration of multi-correlated non-stationary stochastic system dynamics to localize the infarct-related artery (IRA) in acute MI by fully harnessing information from paper-based Electrocardiogram (ECG). The vectorcardiogram (VCG) diagnostic features extracted from only 2.5-s long paper ECG recordings were used to hierarchically localize the IRA-not mere localization of the infarcted cardiac tissues-in acute MI. Paper ECG records and angiograms of 106 acute MI patients collected at the Heart Artery and Vein Center at Fresno California and the 12-lead ECG signals from the Physionet PTB online database were employed to validate the proposed approach. We reported the overall accuracies of 97.41% for healthy control (HC) vs. MI, 89.41 ± 9.89 for left and right culprit arteries vs. others, 88.2 ± 11.6 for left main arteries vs. right-coronary-ascending (RCA) and 93.67 ± 4.89 for left-anterior-descending (LAD) vs. left-circumflex (LCX). The IRA localization from paper ECG can be used to timely triage the patients with acute coronary syndromes to the percutaneous coronary intervention facilities.Entities:
Keywords: computer-aided diagnosis; electrocardiogram; nonlinear dynamic systems
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32708959 PMCID: PMC7412042 DOI: 10.3390/s20143975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Summary of the proposed method to reconstruct the ECG diagnostic signals and localize IRA from the paper ECG.
Figure 2(a) Image of a paper ECG with 2 s long signal of a representative patient showing segments of limb (I, II and III), augmented limb (aVR, aVL and aVF) and precordial (V1-6) leads and a full 10 s of lead II signal. (b) The digitized waveform of the 12-lead ECG signals with the X-axis represent the time duration (ms) and the Y-axis represent the signal amplitude (mV).
Figure 3Summarized steps (a–d) for the reconstruction of 10-s of lead II using 2.5-s of lead II and 10-s of lead III in a representative MI patient using Poincare pattern ensemble method.
Figure 4Steps to formulate the directed weighted network of a cardiac vector in the octant space from a vectorcardiogram signal from a representative subject; (a) time-portrait of three VCG channels X, Y and Y; (b) VCG trajectory in a 3D Cartesian octant space and 8 octants with the signal realizations in each octant are color-coded; (c) temporal transitions of VCG trajectory among 8 octants defined by the 3D Cartesian octant space; and (d) directed weighted network with the nodes are 8 octants and the weighted edges are the transitions of VCG trajectory among the octants.
Description of octant features extracted from the VCG signals.
| Feature Groups | Feature Name (No. of Features) | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Local Octant (I) | OctiMin (8) | Minimal vector magnitude in octant i |
| OctiAvg (8) | Average vector magnitude in octant i | |
| OctiVar (8) | Vector magnitude variance in octant i | |
| Octi1Max (8) | Amplitude of the maximal vector in octant i | |
| Octi1Elv (8) | Elevation of the maximal vector in octant i | |
| OctiAzm (8) | Azimuth of the maximal vector in octant i | |
| Octant Residence (II) | OctiNum (8) | Sojourn time of the vector in octant i |
| SlowTran | Minimal of octant transition rate in 10 s | |
| FastTran | Maximal of octant transition rate in 10 s | |
| MeanTran | Average of octant transition rate in 10 s | |
| VarTran | Variation of octant transition rate in 10 s | |
| Octant Transition (III) | InOctiRate (8) | Arrival rate to octant i from all other octants |
| OutOctiRate (8) | Departure rate from octant i to all other octants | |
| Octant Network Topology (IV) | InDgri (8) | Number of inward links to octant i |
| OutDgri (8) | Number of outward links from octant i | |
| Degri (8) | Octant i node degree | |
| InStri (8) | Sum of inward link weights to octant i | |
| OutStri (8) | Sum of outward link weights from octant i | |
| Stri (8) | Octant i node strength | |
| Clusti (8) | Clustering coefficient of octant i | |
| Jod | Number of octant with outward links > inward links | |
| Jid | Number of octant with inward links > outward links | |
| Jbl | Number of octant with inward links = outward links | |
| Rass | Assortativity coefficient of the octant network | |
| Kden | Number of octants with transitions | |
| Nden | Number of connections in the network | |
| K_den | Density of the octant network | |
| Transi | Transitivity coefficient of the network | |
| Qmod | Maximized modularity coefficient | |
| LambdaNet | Average shortest path length in the octant network | |
| EfficiencyNet | Average inverse shortest path length (Global efficiency) | |
| Ecci (8) | Greatest of all shortest path from octant i to all other octants | |
| RadiusNet | Radius of the octant network | |
| DiameterNet | Diameter of the octant network | |
| NodeBeti (8) | Node betweenness centrality of octant i |
Figure 5(a) Anatomy of the heart with the highlighted left and right coronary arteries (http://medchiefs.bsd.uchicago.edu/); and (b) hierarchical classification tree with four classifiers to localize different culprit arteries. Classifier 1 separates healthy subjects and the MI patients. Classifier 2 distinguishes the MI cases with discernable infarcted locations from those with indiscernible locations. Classifier 3 splits the culprit arteries in right and left coronary arteries. Classifier 4 determines the infarction in left circumflex and left anterior descending arteries in the left main branches.
Baseline characteristics of MI subjects admitted to the Heart, Artery and Vein Center at Fresno California.
| Characteristics | Value | Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity | Hispanic 32.1% | Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 121 ± 26.59 |
| Asian 5.7% | |||
| Caucasian 21.7% | |||
| Black 7.5% | |||
| Eastern Indian 2.8% | |||
| Unknown 30.2% | |||
| Gender | Male 66.9% | Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 71 ± 16.26 |
| Female 33.1% | |||
| Age | 40.02 ± 14.08 | Cholesterol | 167 ± 51.38 |
| Weight (lbs) | 175.58 ± 50.02 | BMI | 28.39 ± 6.26 |
Correlation coefficients between the reconstructed ECG and the measurements in 12-leads of ECG signal.
| Lead | R2 Value (Mean ± Std.) | Lead | R2 Value (Mean ± Std.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 0.96 ± 0.13 | V1 | 0.95 ± 0.23 |
| II | 0.98 ± 0.08 | V2 | 0.92 ± 0.52 |
| III | 0.97 ± 0.13 | V3 | 0.96 ± 0.21 |
| aVR | 0.95 ± 0.31 | V4 | 0.96 ± 0.24 |
| aVL | 0.92 ± 0.47 | V5 | 0.95 ± 0.17 |
| aVF | 0.96 ± 0.16 | V6 | 0.96 ± 0.08 |
Figure 6A representative 10 s long ECG signal of an MI patient reconstructed from 2.5-s paper-based signals collected from (a) limb leads, (b) augmented limb leads and (c,d) precordial leads.
Figure 7A set of 22 features and their corresponding weight values selected from the PCA analysis with the cut-off at the feature OutDgr3.
Figure 8Variable importance plot of the selected features with the cut off threshold specified.
Figure 9Summary of CART trees and corresponding contingency matrix of various IRA localization. All CART models are specified in terms of a trees structure with the solid lines denoting the true branch (i.e., the condition stated at the root of the tree holds) and the dashed line denoting the false branch. The optimized model structures are showed in (a–d). At the first level, classification was sought between healthy subjects and MI patients (a); later, the culprit arteries were classified into in left and right arteries (LR) vs. unspecified (E) in (b); and the specified occlusion was localized on left main arteries or right arteries (RCA) in (c). If it was on the left, the model continues to determine whether it is left circumflex artery (LCX) or left anterior descending (LAD) branches (d).
Classification accuracies of different classes using CART and SVM models.
| Models | Level in the Hierarchy Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC vs. MI | LR vs. E | LCA vs. RCA | LAD vs. LCX | |
| CART | 97.41 ± 2.44 | 83.03 ± 9.71 | 77.42 ± 5.18 | 83.34 ± 0.0 |
| SVM | 91.07 ± 4.46 | 89.41 ± 9.89 | 88.2 ± 11.6 | 93.67 ± 4.89 |
| KNN | 88.4 ± 0.75 | 84.57 ± 2.96 | 84.58 ± 3.52 | 88.89 ± 1.65 |
| NN | 85.75 ± 2.89 | 89.5 ± 4.37 | 76.13 ± 15.08 | 87.57 ± 6.92 |
| BET | 91.3 ± 0.69 | 77.73 ± 2.66 | 64.01 ± 6.59 | 84.49 ± 3.88 |