Literature DB >> 8285929

A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography.

W J Manning1, W Li, R R Edelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to assess the patency of coronary arteries by noninvasive means would represent an important advance. We have developed a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coronary angiographic technique that permits the display of areas of abnormal coronary blood flow. We have compared this method with conventional contrast angiography for the identification of coronary-artery stenoses.
METHODS: MRI coronary angiography was performed with an electrocardiographically gated sequence in 39 subjects, 33 to 84 years of age, who were scheduled for elective cardiac catheterization with coronary angiography. Sequential overlapping transverse and oblique sections were acquired during periods of breath-holding and were displayed as cine loops for analysis. MRI and conventional angiographic data were compared in a blinded manner. The four major epicardial coronary arteries were classified by MRI coronary angiography as being normal (or having only minimal irregularities) or as having disease that was moderately severe to severe.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MRI coronary angiography, as compared with conventional angiography, for correctly identifying individual vessels with > or = 50 percent angiographic stenoses were 90 percent and 92 percent, respectively. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 0.85 and 0.95, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the technique were 100 percent and 100 percent, respectively, for the left main coronary artery, 87 percent and 92 percent for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 71 percent and 90 percent for the left circumflex coronary artery, and 100 percent and 78 percent for the right coronary artery.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI coronary angiography provides a new approach to evaluating the patency of coronary arteries. These preliminary data suggest that this technique may provide a noninvasive means of evaluating patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. At its current stage of development, this procedure may be most helpful for excluding clinically important stenoses in patients referred for diagnostic contrast angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8285929     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199303253281202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  62 in total

Review 1.  Breathhold cardiac MRI and MRA.

Authors:  G G Hartnell
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

2.  Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging in Chest Pain Syndromes.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Usefulness of coronary MR angiography prior to angioplasty.

Authors:  A J Duerinckx; D Laughrun; B S Lewis
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-12

4.  The intravascular contrast agent Clariscan (NC 100150 injection) for 3D MR coronary angiography in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  C Klein; E Nagel; B Schnackenburg; A Bornstedt; S Schalla; V Hoffmann; A Lehning; E Fleck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Volume coronary angiography using targeted scans (VCATS): a new strategy in MR coronary angiography.

Authors:  R J van Geuns; P A Wielopolski; A J Wardeh; H G de Bruin; M Oudkerk; P J de Feyter
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Ischemic heart disease: value of MR techniques.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; F P van Rugge; H W Vliegen; J H Reiber; A de Roos; A V Bruschke
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts: clinical reality?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; S E Langerak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Coronary MR angiography.

Authors:  A J Duerinckx
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography.

Authors:  Phillip C Yang; Michael V McConnell; Dwight G Nishimura; Bob S Hu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of coronary artery occlusions in the navigator technique.

Authors:  Thomas Wittlinger; Thomas Voigtländer; Martin Rohr; Jürgen Meyer; Martin Thelen; Karl Friedrich Kreitner; Peter Kalden
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.