| Literature DB >> 32708743 |
Talía Sainz1,2, María José Gosalbes3,4, Alba Talavera-Rodríguez5, Nuria Jimenez-Hernandez3,4, Luis Prieto2,6, Luis Escosa1,2, Sara Guillén2,7, José Tomás Ramos2,8, María Ángeles Muñoz-Fernández9, Andrés Moya3,4,10, Maria Luisa Navarro2,11, María José Mellado1,2, Sergio Serrano-Villar12.
Abstract
AIMS: The gut microbiota exerts a critical influence in the immune system. The gut microbiota of human virus immunodeficiency (HIV)-infected children remains barely explored. We aimed to characterize the fecal microbiota in vertically HIV-infected children and to explore the effects of its modulation with a symbiotic nutritional intervention.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; children and adolescents; microbiota; vertical transmission
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32708743 PMCID: PMC7400861 DOI: 10.3390/nu12072112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Product composition: Intake per day.
| Active | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 65.3 kcal | 74.9 kcal |
| Total lipids | 5.1 g | 0 |
| EPA | 3.2 g | 0 |
| DHA | 0.3 g | 0 |
| GLA | 1.7 g | 0 |
| Total carbohydrates | 10.3 g | 10.9 g |
| Long-chain FOS | 4 g | 0 |
| Short-chain GOS | 3.3 g | 0 |
| Maltodextrin (excipient) | 3 | 0 |
| Total proteins | 3.3 g | 6.9 g |
| L-Glutamine | 2 g | 0 |
| L-Arginine | 1.2 g | 0 |
| Others | 1.2 g | 0 |
|
| 0.17 g | 0 |
| AM3 | 1 g | 0 |
| Vitamin D | 5.3 × 103 MU | 0 |
| TOTAL | 21.1 | 21.1 |
Abbreviations: EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; GLA, γ-linolenic acid; FOS, fructo oligosaccharides; GOS, galacto oligosaccharides.
Main characteristics of the study cohorts at baseline.
| Controls | Placebo | Nutritional Intervention |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female ( | 4 (36.4) | 7 (58.3) | 8 (66.7) | 1.000 |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 10 (4.4) | 13.8 (3.6) | 10 (3.4) | 0.064 |
| Caucasian ( | 7 (64) | 6 (50) | 7 (58.3) | 1.000 |
| CD4 count (cells/mm3) | - | 556 (453–754) | 852 (617–1182) | 0.0496 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | - | 1.1 (0.56–1.67) | 1.4 (1.09–1.94) | 0.106 |
| CD4 Nadir (cells/mm3) | - | 333 (169–382) | 519 (384–979) | 0.006 |
| PI based ART ( | - | 8 (66.7) | 9 (75) | 0.136 |
All values are expressed in median (IQR) except otherwise specified. ART: antiretroviral treatment. PI: protease inhibitor.
Figure 1Alpha diversity metrics comparison across study groups. (A), Number of species, illustrates de number of unique taxa identified. (B), Chao1, an estimation of real richness based on the number of taxa supported by either 1 or 2 sequencing reads. (C), ACE, an estimation of real richness based on the number of taxa supported by 10 reads. (D), Shannon, a metric to quantify the uncertainty of the taxonomic identity of an unknown entity in a community based on the number of different entities and their abundance.
Figure 2Beta diversity analysis based on weighted Unifrac distances. (A), Principal component analysis based on weighted Unifrac distances. HIV-infected children at baseline vs. controls, Adonis p = 0.042; HIV-infected children at week 4 vs. controls, p = 0.272; HIV-infected children at week 0 vs. week 4, p = 0.729. (B) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis, HIV-infected children at baseline vs. controls and (C) HIV-infected children at baseline vs. week 4. NMDS, Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling.
Figure 3Relative abundance of top 15 more prevalent genus. Differences between the HIV-infected vs. the control groups could be appreciated, without clear differences related to the intervention. Figure 3 (A) shows the mean relative abundances of the top 15 most abundance genus in each group. Figure 3 (B) shows the individual relative abundances of each study subject at each timepoint.
Figure 4Bacterial taxa driving divergences between groups using LEfSe analysis, HIV-infected children vs. controls at baseline. The analysis week 0 vs. week 4 samples from HIV-infected subjects in the PMT25341 arm did not identify any significant change in the abundance of bacterial genus. The linear discriminative analysis (LDA) scores (log 10) for the most prevalent taxa among controls, represented in red, are plotted in the positive scale, whereas LDA-negative scores indicate those taxa enriched in the HIV-infected group at baseline or after the intervention are represented in green.