Literature DB >> 32705346

Down syndrome, accelerated aging and immunosenescence.

Noémie Gensous1,2,3, Maria Giulia Bacalini4, Claudio Franceschi5,4,6, Paolo Garagnani5,7,8,9.   

Abstract

Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal disorder, associated with moderate to severe intellectual disability. While life expectancy of Down syndrome population has greatly increased over the last decades, mortality rates are still high and subjects are facing prematurely a phenomenon of atypical and accelerated aging. The presence of an immune impairment in Down syndrome subjects is suggested for a long time by the existence of an increased incidence of infections, the incomplete efficacy of vaccinations, and a high prevalence of autoimmunity. Immunologic abnormalities have been described since many years in this population, both from a numerical and a functional points of view, and these abnormalities can mirror the ones observed during normal aging. In this review, we summarize our knowledge on immunologic disturbances commonly observed in subjects with Down syndrome, and in innate and adaptive immunity, as well as regarding chronic inflammation. We then discuss the role of accelerated aging in these observed abnormalities and finally review the potential age-associated molecular and cellular mechanisms involved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerated aging; Down syndrome; Immunosenescence; Inflammaging

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32705346      PMCID: PMC7666319          DOI: 10.1007/s00281-020-00804-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Immunopathol        ISSN: 1863-2297            Impact factor:   9.623


Introduction

Down syndrome (DS) or trisomy 21 is the most common known genetic disorder associated with moderate to severe intellectual disability, occurring in approximately 1 out of every 600–700 live births [1, 2]. DS is related to a chromosomal disorder, corresponding to a total or partial trisomy of the autosomal chromosome 21. Even if during the past decades life expectancy in DS population has greatly increased [3-6], DS individuals have still higher mortality rates as compared with other populations [7, 8]. In addition to signs specifically associated with their congenital syndrome, subjects with DS appear to age differently from the general population, and it is evident that they present symptoms of aging ahead of time, leading to the classical description of DS as a progeroid syndrome and as a model of accelerated aging [9-12]. In this work, we review how the phenomenon of aging impacts the immune system in DS subjects. We firstly describe clinical features of DS individuals from an immune point of view. We then summarize evidence on immunosenescence in DS subjects and how it impacts both innate and adaptive immunity, as well as chronic inflammation. Finally, we discuss the potentially age-associated mechanisms involved.

Accelerated and atypical aging in Down syndrome

DS has long been considered as a progeroid syndrome, as individuals with trisomy 21 start to age prematurely and present precociously conditions usually characteristic of the geriatric population [9-12]. The aging process in DS subjects not only seems to be premature/accelerated but also appears to be atypical and segmental, as it recapitulates many, but not all, of the classical signs and symptoms of aging [13, 14]. Clinically, DS subjects present signs of early aging affecting particularly the neurological system, with an extremely high prevalence of dementia of Alzheimer’s type [15]. Aging affects also prematurely the dermatological, sensory, endocrine, and musculoskeletal systems, leading to high levels of mortality and multi-morbidity in this population [16]. From a biological point of view, the same trend of accelerated aging has been observed with the use of aging biomarkers [17]. The latest and powerful generations of biomarkers which are based on different approaches have been applied to cohorts of DS adults. Interestingly, these different biomarkers show concordantly accelerated aging in subjects with DS, whether epigenetic clocks [18, 19], metabolic biomarkers such as GlycoAge [20], or predicted brain age [21] are tested.

Clinical features suggesting an immune impairment in Down syndrome individuals

Significant evidence has accumulated on the existence of an immune dysregulation in DS, existing from the very beginning of the life of DS individuals. Firstly, it has been observed that DS subjects are characterized by a higher susceptibility to bacterial infections as compared with the general population, with especially a higher incidence of recurrent and chronic respiratory tract ones [22-25]. DS individuals have furthermore altered responses to vaccinations with conjugate or toxoid vaccines [26-29]. These suboptimal antibody responses potentially worsen the phenomenon of higher susceptibility to infections. Finally, DS subjects have frequently high levels of autoantibodies. While some of them seem to be not related to an eventual clinical significance [30], the others are associated with a higher incidence of organ-specific autoimmune disorders, affecting especially the endocrine system [31-33]. This clinical picture recapitulates the increased incidence of infections, the failure of vaccination, and the high prevalence of autoantibodies that can be observed in older people of the general population, supporting here also the concept of DS as an accelerated aging syndrome. This clinical presentation is the reflect of important alterations in immune homeostasis in DS with significant perturbations in all branches of the immune system, some of them being common with the ones observed during immunosenescence and that will be detailed in the next sections.

Immunosenescence and inflammaging in Down syndrome

During aging, the immune system shows marked changes which have been gathered under the term immunosenescence [34-37]. There is a progressive decline in several immune parameters, affecting both innate and acquired immunity, as compared with young healthy subjects. Main hallmarks of immunosenescence are a reduction in the output of naïve T cells by the thymus with an accumulation of memory cells and a consequent reduction in the T cell repertoire and in the ability of these cells to respond to novel antigens (whether infectious or vaccinations). Alongside, aging is characterized by the existence of a chronic, sterile, low-grade inflammation named inflammaging [38]. In the next paragraphs, we will try to parallel the observations made on DS subjects’ immune system and the ones observed during normal aging, focusing on adaptive immunity, innate immunity, and inflammation.

Adaptive immune system

The main changes in the adaptive immune system during normal aging occur in the T cell compartment as T lymphocytes appear to be dramatically affected, with a decrease in naïve T cells and an increase in memory ones [37, 39–41]. The decline in the maintenance of a sizable naïve T cell compartment leads to a major restriction in T cell diversity with increasing age [42, 43]. This restricted T cell repertoire correlates with the inability to mount efficient immune responses to novel antigens. Additionally, changes in the distribution of memory T cell subpopulations are observed during aging. Immunosenescence is characterized by the accumulation of effector memory T cells (TEM) and T effector memory re-expressing CD45RA cells (TEMRA) (defined as CCR7-CD45RA− and CCR7-CD45RA+ respectively), while there is a decrease in central memory T cell (TCM) compartment (defined as CCR7+CD45RA−). The accumulation of terminally differentiated cells with a senescent phenotype during aging has also been more recently associated with the expression of other surface markers, such as CD57, KLRG1, and PD-1 [44]. KLRG1 is considered as an inhibitor of proliferation, whereas PD-1 is associated with immune exhaustion. In DS, studies on immune system have been mainly focused on the T cell compartment (Table 1). DS subjects seem to have a clear reduction in the number of circulating CD4+ T cells as compared with age-matched controls [45-51]. Beyond this numerical reduction of CD4+ T cells, an impaired maturation has also been observed [52] and imbalances between T cell subpopulations have been described [23, 45, 49, 53–55]. Like during immunosenescence, a reduction in naïve (CD4+ CD45RA+) lymphocytes has been described in DS, as well as an enrichment in memory T cells and a progressive inversion of the CD4+/CD8+ ratio [45–47, 56]. Higher percentages of Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes have been observed in subjects with DS, while there was no difference in Th2 cell percentages, suggesting a discrete imbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory immune responses [49, 57]. Regarding peripheral regulatory T cells, their proportions are increased, but their function seems to be impaired, as their inhibitory activity is decreased as compared with controls [49, 53, 57, 58]. Functional impairment of other T cell subpopulations has also been described, supported by weaker proliferative responses to specific mitogens at all ages [51, 59–62] and imbalanced cytokine production [58, 60, 63]. However, recently, Schoch et al. stated that despite phenotypical signs of immune exhaustion of lymphocyte subsets (quantified by a higher expression of PD-1), their functionality was normal and preserved, as the subjects were able to mount effector T cell responses with normal functional characteristics [49]. Finally, regarding CD8+ T cells, they appear to also be depleted in naïve subsets, with a higher expression of markers of activation (granzyme B, interferon-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) and senescence (KLRG1) [57].
Table 1

T lymphocyte compartment in subjects with Down syndrome

AuthorYearNumber of subjectsAgeMain result
Burgio et al. [62]197583 DS subjectsAge groups: 0–5 years: 21 subjectsCorrelation between PHA responsiveness and age (normal response before 11 years old)
76 age-matched controls6–10 years: 8 subjects. 11–15 years: 10 subjects. 16–20 years: 18 subjects. 21–25 years: 18 subjects. 26–30 years: 8 subjects
Franceschi et al. [59]198128 DS subjectsDS subjects: age range: 6–23 yearsNo difference in lymphocyte counts
28 age-matched controlsControls: age range: 10–27 yearsImpairment in the PHA and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction responses
Karttunen et al. [61]198418 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 20 yearsLow response to PHA-induced stimulation in half of the DS subjects. Strong negative correlation between the age and the response. Normal IL-2 production
Controls (n = NA)Controls: adults, mean age NAInversion of CD4+/CD8+ ratio
Lockitch et al. [51]198764 DS subjectsDS subjects: age range: 1–19 yearsLower lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, T helper, and suppressor cell counts
30 age-matched controlsControls: age range: 1–19 yearsReduced response to PHA in vitro
Cossarizza et al. [47]199015 DS childrenNADecrease of the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes and of the absolute number of CD4+ cells
16 age-matched controlsIncrease in the percentages of CD8+ cells
Murphy et al. [54]199213 DS subjectsNALower naïve T cells in peripheral blood
13 age-matched controls
Barrena et al. [45]199389 DS subjects30 children with DS (mean age = 7.9 years) and 59 adults with DS (mean age = 34 years)Decrease in CD4+CD45RA+ cells. Inversion of CD45RA/CD29 ratio
59 age-matched controls
Park et al. [60]200043 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 45 yearsLower PHA-stimulated proliferation and IL-2 production in aged individuals (> 30 years old)
43 age-matched controlsControls: NA
Cocchi et al. [46]200730 DS subjectsChildren born from 1999 to 2004In the five first years of life, progressive decrease in the medium values of lymphocytes and CD4+ levels, with a concomitant increase in CD8+ cells. Lower values of lymphocyte and CD4+ cell counts. Lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio
Guazzarotti et al. [52]200925 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 12.2 yearsReduction of percentages and absolute numbers of CD4+ T cells. Reduction of CD4+/CD8+ ratio
42 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 11.7 yearsReduction of naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Increase in central memory and terminally differentiated CD4+ lymphocytes
Cetiner et al. [63]201032 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 3.9 yearsHigher percentage of CD8+ T cells. Similar percentage of CD4+ T cells and similar CD4+/CD8+ ratio
32 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 4.5 years
Joshi et al. [48]201112 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 9.4 yearsLower percentages of CD3+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, lower absolute numbers of CD4+ T cells. Lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio
12 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 9.4 years
Trotta et al. [50]201124 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 38 yearsSimilar percentages of CD3+ T cells. Higher percentages of CD8+ T cells
21 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 43 years
Pellegrini et al. [53]201229 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 11.4 yearsDecrease in CD4+ T cells. Increase in CD8+ T cells. Decrease of CD4+/CD8+ ratio
29 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 9.3 yearsIncrease in the number of circulating Treg (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+) cells, with impaired function in vitro
Schoch et al. [49]201740 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 7.4 yearsLower levels of CD4+ T cells, no differences in CD8+ T cells
51 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 8.8 yearsHigher Th1/Th2 ratio and higher percentages of regulatory T cells
Higher expression of the inhibitory receptor PD-1 in all T cell subpopulations
Farroni et al. [55]201812 DS subjectsNAReduction of Tfh cells in peripheral blood and tonsils. Impairment of the germinal center reaction
11 age-matched controls
Mitwalli et al. [23]2018150 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 5.56 yearsReduction in total lymphocyte count. Decrease in CD4+ T cells
100 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 6.11 years
Waugh et al. [56]201918 DS subjectsDS subjects: median age = 29.5 yearsNo difference in total CD4+ T cells. Decrease in naïve CD4+ T cells. Enrichment in CD27+ CD4+ memory T cells
18 age-matched controlsControls: median age = 28.0 years
Araya et al. [57]201931 DS subjectsDS subjects: median age (cohort 1) = 26.4 years, median age (cohort 2) = 28.3 years, median age (cohort 3) = 29.6 yearsHigher percentage of CD8+ T cells. Decreased frequency of CD4+ T cells. Lower CD4/CD8 ratio. Enrichment in differentiated and senescent CD8+ subsets
40 age-matched controlsControls: median age (cohort 1) = 33.1 years, median age (cohort 2) = 27.9 years, median age (cohort 3) = 30.2 years

DS, Down syndrome; NA, not available; PHA, phytohemagglutinin

T lymphocyte compartment in subjects with Down syndrome DS, Down syndrome; NA, not available; PHA, phytohemagglutinin The thymus is a key lymphoid organ affected by immunosenescence, as it undergoes major changes during aging with a process of involution and shrinking, and a constant decline in the output of newly generated T lymphocytes [39]. In DS subjects, numerous reports have described thymic impairment, with reduced thymic size, decreased intra-thymic expansion of immature T cells, alterations in thymocyte subpopulations, and inefficient intra-thymic maturation [64-69]. T cell receptor (TCR) rearrangement excision circle (TREC) counts can be used to estimate recent thymic lymphocyte emigrants, a reflection of the newly generated T cells. In DS, numbers of TREC+ peripheral blood cells are significantly lower than those in healthy controls, possibly accelerating the early senescence of the immune system, with a negative correlation between age and the levels of TREC+ cells [48, 58, 69]. Aging also affects the humoral compartment, with reduction in B cell numbers and repertoire diversity [70]. In DS, there are lower numbers of circulating B cells as compared with controls [47, 49, 50, 56, 63, 71], with associated changes in B cell subpopulations (Table 2). Thus, defects in memory B cells have been described [29, 48, 71–73] but also decrease in transitional and/or naïve B lymphocytes [56, 71]. DS subjects are characterized by lower serum levels of immunoglobulins IgM, while the other isotypes seem not to be affected [50, 51, 72, 73]. The impairment of the humoral immune system can lead to alterations in the responses to vaccinations [26, 29, 55]. Additionally, it can have an important impact on mucosal immunity, which is fundamental in the digestive and respiratory tracts for protection against infectious diseases, with possible impairment of mucosal IgA secretion rates in DS subjects [74].
Table 2

B lymphocyte compartment in subjects with Down syndrome

AuthorYearNumber of subjectsAgeMain result
Cossarizza et al. [47]199015 DS childrenNADecrease of B lymphocytes absolute number and percentage
16 age-matched controls
Cetiner et al. [63]201032 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 3.9 yearsLower percentages of B cells
32 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 4.5 years
Verstegen et al. [71]201095 DS subjectsChildren. Mean age NADecrease in B lymphocyte counts. Lack of vast expansion of B cells within the first years of life. Decrease in transitional and naive B lymphocytes. Disturbed peripheral B lymphocyte maturation
33 age-matched controls
Joshi et al. [48]201112 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 9.4 yearsDecrease of B lymphocytes absolute number and percentage. Decreased total memory and class-switched memory B cells
12 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 9.4 years
Trotta et al. [50]201124 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 38 yearsLower percentages of B lymphocytes
21 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 43 years
Verstegen et al. [73]201413 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age = 11.3 yearsIn blood, decrease in B lymphocytes. Lower numbers of naïve mature B cells. Normal numbers of transitional B cells. Lower numbers of memory B cells
43 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = NAIn tonsils, normal germinal center cells
Carsetti et al. [72]201526 DS subjectsDS subjects: median age = 8.74 yearsLower circulating B lymphocytes. Reduction in transitional and mature-naïve B cell numbers. Lower frequency of switched memory B cells specific for vaccine antigens
26 age-matched controlsControls: median age = 8 years
Valentini et al. [29]201515 DS subjectsDS subjects: median age = 6.6 yearsReduction of total, mature, naïve, and transitional B cells. Severe reduction of switched memory B cells
15 age-matched controlsControls: median age = 7.8 years
Schoch et al. [49]201740 DS subjectsDS subjects: mean age= 7.4 yearsLower percentage of B cells
51 age-matched controlsControls: mean age = 8.8 years
Farroni et al. [55]201812 DS subjectsNAIn tonsils, similar frequency of total B cells. Increase in naïve B cells, with reduction in memory B cells
11 age-matched controlsImpairment of the germinal center reaction
Waugh et al. [56]201918 DS subjectsDS subjects: median age = 29.5 yearsDepletion of immature naïve, pre-switched activated and memory B cells. Increase in terminally differentiated plasmablasts. Increase in B cells expressing CD11c (signature phenotype of age-associated B cells)
18 age-matched controlsControls: median age = 28.0 years

DS, Down syndrome; NA, not available

B lymphocyte compartment in subjects with Down syndrome DS, Down syndrome; NA, not available

Innate immune system

There are fewer reports evaluating the innate immune system in DS, as compared with the work done on the adaptive one. Regarding the myeloid compartment of the innate immune system, one work has suggested that DS subjects have lower granulocyte counts, lower numbers of myeloid dendritic cells, and higher amounts of pro-inflammatory monocytes (CD14dimCD16+) in peripheral blood as compared with controls [75]. This shift toward subsets associated with inflammation with an increase in inflammatory monocytes was further confirmed [56]. During normal aging, there is an increase in the proportions of natural killer (NK) cells [76, 77]. Regarding this compartment, results in DS are contradictory. First reports in DS, published in the early 1990s, testified of the existence of an expansion of cells with NK activity markers (CD16, CD56, CD57) [47, 78], which were however found functionally inefficient with a reduced NK activity [78]. In more recent reports, results were more inconsistent. Higher percentages of NK cells were described in three works [49, 56, 63], associated with an heightened state of activation [56], whereas absolute number was found normal [75] or even lower [79] in DS subjects as compared with controls. According to some authors, discrepancies could be partly attributed to the definitions used to define NK cells that did not fully discriminate NK cells from other subpopulations of T cells in the initial publications (no differentiation between CD3− and CD3+ cells).

Inflammation

Aging is characterized by a chronic, low-grade, and sterile inflammation, called “inflammaging,” which has been directly associated with several age-related conditions [38, 80, 81]. The subclinical accumulation of pro-inflammatory factors progresses in parallel with immunosenescence (i.e., mainly a decrease in less-differentiated subsets associated with increase in terminally differentiated ones), and together, they form a vicious circle. In DS subjects, features of chronic inflammation are strongly present. Individuals with DS have increased spontaneous circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interferon (IFN) gamma, or interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1β [50, 82–87]. This pro-inflammatory cytokine profile was confirmed in a recent meta-analysis performed by Zhang et al. on 19 studies in DS subjects, in which significantly increased circulating levels of TNF-α, IFNγ, and IL-1β were demonstrated [88]. Recent works have shed light on the presence of a constant activation of the IFN response in individuals with DS [56, 57, 87, 89]. On a transcriptomic side, a consistent overexpression and hyperactivation of the interferon transcriptional response have been observed in different cell types [56, 57, 89], while on a protein side, an increased expression of IFN receptors and hypersensitivity to IFN-alpha were described [56]. The overexpression of IFN receptors (among which four of the six are encoded by genes located on chromosome 21 [90]), and especially type I IFN receptor subunit IFNAR1, is present across the entire immune system. In response to IFN stimulation, immune cells of DS individuals are hypersensitive and present a hyperactivation of cell type-specific downstream signaling cascades [56, 57]. This increased interferon signaling has been linked to major circulating proteomic changes that are indicative of chronic auto-inflammation and which could fit in the scope of other inflammatory conditions (such as systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis) or type I interferonopathies [87]. The chronic pro-inflammatory state observed in DS subjects is likely to greatly contribute to neurodegeneration. Inflammation is indeed considered as an important contributor to neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, which is highly prevalent in this population [91, 92]. Thus, combined measurement of Aβ40 and Aβ42 plasmatic levels with inflammatory molecules (such as TNF-α and IL-6) can be used as a strong predictor of prospective cognitive deterioration in DS individuals [83].

Is the immune system in Down syndrome intrinsically deficient or victim of accelerated aging?

As we have seen above, quantitative and qualitative alterations in all the compartments of the immune system in DS subjects have been well documented. The exact etiology of these alterations is however still debated, and the unanswered question is the following: is the immune system in DS primarily deficient or is it a victim of accelerated aging? On one hand, some observations seem to be in line with the presence of an intrinsic defect [71, 79, 93]. Children with DS lack the vast expansion of T cells in the first years of life, and the lymphopenia observed later could be related to the impaired expansion of these cell lines in infancy. The impaired thymic output could be attributable partly to the altered thymic anatomy and function, present from the fetal stage onwards. To this regard, it should also be kept in mind that children with DS are at higher risk of thymectomy during cardiac surgery performed for congenital heart malformation. The information of the existence of a previous thymus resection is not always present in the studies, even though it has been demonstrated that thymectomy in this population can be associated with lower percentages of peripheral T cells [49]. On the other hand, the observed alterations in adaptive immunity in DS appear reminiscent of immunosenescence, with a phenomenon exacerbated with the age of the subjects [94]. For example, levels of T cells expressing TREC are significantly lower in DS individuals as compared with controls, and these levels correlate with the age of the subjects [58]. Moreover, a progressive decrease in the values of CD4+ T cells is observed in the first years of life of DS subjects [46]. From a functional point of view, lymphocyte responsiveness to phytohemagglutinin stimulation appears to be in the normal range during the first decade of life, but decreases progressively thereafter [61, 62]. Of particular importance is the obvious pro-inflammatory state observed in DS subjects, which is really similar to typical inflammaging observed during normal aging of the general population [56]. There is a likely possibility that both phenomena of intrinsic defect and accelerated aging are combined, like it seems to be the case in the mouse model of DS (Ts65Dn) [95]. In the animals, there is a clear decrease of the thymic output of immature T cells with a decline and involution of thymocyte progenitors, but at the same time, peripheral mature lymphocytes appear prematurely senescent and have a reduced capacity of proliferation after polyclonal stimulation [95]. In humans, this scenario appears possible and should be addressed in future studies, at the same time as some limits of the published works should be addressed too. Thus, one important limit of the work carried in DS immune system so far is the great heterogeneity of the individuals included in the studies regarding their chronological age. Observations published were performed on newborns, infants, children, or adults, and the comparability of these results is thus limited. Additionally, within the DS population itself, individuals are characterized by a large variability in terms of phenotype, with a high level of complexity in terms of co-morbidities, associated treatments, and social and cultural environments, which can all have a direct or indirect impact on the immune system.

Accelerated immunosenescence in Down syndrome subjects: potential causes

Aging is driven by interconnected cellular and molecular mechanisms, which have been gathered under the terms of hallmarks or pillars of aging [96, 97]. These mechanisms are highly altered in DS subjects [17] and thus could participate in the acceleration of the aging process, especially in the immune system. Firstly, it is clear that there is a premature aging of the stem cell compartment in DS individuals, and especially of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with a significant decrease in circulating human stem and progenitor cells and a lack of HSC self-renewal [56, 98–100]. Secondly, alterations of metabolism have been described at different levels, with impairment of mitochondrial function and presence of chronic oxidative stress [101-103]. Thus, increased levels of endogenous oxygen species have been observed in lymphocytes from individuals with DS as compared with controls [104]. Additionally, higher levels of macromolecular damage are present in DS subjects, especially occurring on DNA molecules in lymphocytes [104-108], and an acceleration of telomere loss has been described in DS lymphocytes as well [109]. Finally, epigenetic patterns are modified, with differential blood DNA methylation signatures in DS individuals [110, 111] and age-related changes in the epigenetic machinery [112].

Conclusions

Individuals with DS display a spectrum of clinical and biological abnormalities, which are compatible with an important immune impairment. These disturbances are likely caused by the co-existence of two phenomena, with an intrinsic defect and precocious aging on one hand, and a clear phenomenon of accelerated aging on the other hand. The immune dysregulation affects key cell types, both in myeloid and lymphoid compartments, and is associated with a chronic state of inflammation. The dysregulation of immune responses and the inflammatory state are likely to greatly contribute to age-related diseases and especially to neurodegeneration which is highly prevalent in this specific population [15]. Owing to the high level of co-morbidities present in DS individuals, there is an important need to develop and test novel therapeutic strategies [17, 56], in order to target and possibly tackle the phenomenon of accelerated aging in this population.
  111 in total

1.  Distinct abnormalities in the innate immune system of children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Beatrijs L P Bloemers; Grada M van Bleek; Jan L L Kimpen; Louis Bont
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Intrinsic abnormalities of lymphocyte counts in children with down syndrome.

Authors:  Yvette C M de Hingh; Petrus W van der Vossen; Eugenie F A Gemen; André B Mulder; Wim C J Hop; Frank Brus; Esther de Vries
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 3.  T cell development and receptor diversity during aging.

Authors:  Jörg J Goronzy; Cornelia M Weyand
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.486

4.  Immunological patterns in young children with Down syndrome: is there a temporal trend?

Authors:  Guido Cocchi; Maura Mastrocola; Marilu' Capelli; Annalisa Bastelli; Francesca Vitali; Luigi Corvaglia
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 2.299

5.  A systems biology approach to Down syndrome: identification of Notch/Wnt dysregulation in a model of stem cells aging.

Authors:  C J Cairney; G Sanguinetti; E Ranghini; A D Chantry; M C Nostro; A Bhattacharyya; C N Svendsen; W N Keith; I Bellantuono
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-02-06

6.  Generation of switched memory B cells in response to vaccination in Down syndrome children and their siblings.

Authors:  Diletta Valentini; Valentina Marcellini; Simona Bianchi; Alberto Villani; Marzia Facchini; Isabella Donatelli; Maria Rita Castrucci; Emiliano Marasco; Chiara Farroni; Rita Carsetti
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Homeostatic cytokines and expansion of regulatory T cells accompany thymic impairment in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Erika Roat; Nicole Prada; Enrico Lugli; Milena Nasi; Roberta Ferraresi; Leonarda Troiano; Chiara Giovenzana; Marcello Pinti; Ornella Biagioni; Mauro Mariotti; Angelo Di Iorio; Ugo Consolo; Fiorella Balli; Andrea Cossarizza
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.663

8.  Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes.

Authors:  H Vaziri; F Schächter; I Uchida; L Wei; X Zhu; R Effros; D Cohen; C B Harley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Chronic inflammation (inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases.

Authors:  Claudio Franceschi; Judith Campisi
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 10.  Immunosenescence and Its Hallmarks: How to Oppose Aging Strategically? A Review of Potential Options for Therapeutic Intervention.

Authors:  Anna Aiello; Farzin Farzaneh; Giuseppina Candore; Calogero Caruso; Sergio Davinelli; Caterina Maria Gambino; Mattia Emanuela Ligotti; Nahid Zareian; Giulia Accardi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  11 in total

1.  Deep immune phenotyping reveals similarities between aging, Down syndrome, and autoimmunity.

Authors:  Katharina Lambert; Keagan G Moo; Azlann Arnett; Gautam Goel; Alex Hu; Kaitlin J Flynn; Cate Speake; Alice E Wiedeman; Vivian H Gersuk; Peter S Linsley; Carla J Greenbaum; S Alice Long; Rebecca Partridge; Jane H Buckner; Bernard Khor
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 19.319

Review 2.  Beyond amyloid: Immune, cerebrovascular, and metabolic contributions to Alzheimer disease in people with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Alessandra C Martini; Thomas J Gross; Elizabeth Head; Mark Mapstone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 18.688

3.  DNA Methylation Analysis of Ribosomal DNA in Adults With Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Francesco Ravaioli; Michele Zampieri; Luca Morandi; Chiara Pirazzini; Camilla Pellegrini; Sara De Fanti; Noémie Gensous; Gian Luca Pirazzoli; Luisa Sambati; Alessandro Ghezzo; Fabio Ciccarone; Anna Reale; Daniela Monti; Stefano Salvioli; Paola Caiafa; Miriam Capri; Alexander Bürkle; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Paolo Garagnani; Claudio Franceschi; Maria Giulia Bacalini
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  The complex relationship between Immunosenescence and Inflammaging: Special issue on the New Biomedical Perspectives.

Authors:  Claudio Franceschi; Aurelia Santoro; Miriam Capri
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 9.623

5.  Susceptibility to Heart Defects in Down Syndrome Is Associated with Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in HAS 21 Interferon Receptor Cluster and VEGFA Genes.

Authors:  Carmela Rita Balistreri; Claudia Leonarda Ammoscato; Letizia Scola; Tiziana Fragapane; Rosa Maria Giarratana; Domenico Lio; Maria Piccione
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Hearing impairment in murine model of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Guang-Di Chen; Li Li; Andrew McCall; Dalian Ding; Zhuo Xing; Y Eugene Yu; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Lamivudine, a reverse transcriptase inhibitor, rescues cognitive deficits in a mouse model of down syndrome.

Authors:  Maria Martinez de Lagran; Aleix Elizalde-Torrent; Roger Paredes; Bonaventura Clotet; Mara Dierssen
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.295

8.  Altered spontaneous brain activity in Down syndrome and its relation with cognitive outcome.

Authors:  Cristina Cañete-Massé; Maria Carbó-Carreté; Maribel Peró-Cebollero; Shi-Xian Cui; Chao-Gan Yan; Joan Guàrdia-Olmos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Risks of covid-19 hospital admission and death for people with learning disability: population based cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Williamson; Helen I McDonald; Krishnan Bhaskaran; Alex J Walker; Sebastian Bacon; Simon Davy; Anna Schultze; Laurie Tomlinson; Chris Bates; Mary Ramsay; Helen J Curtis; Harriet Forbes; Kevin Wing; Caroline Minassian; John Tazare; Caroline E Morton; Emily Nightingale; Amir Mehrkar; Dave Evans; Peter Inglesby; Brian MacKenna; Jonathan Cockburn; Christopher T Rentsch; Rohini Mathur; Angel Y S Wong; Rosalind M Eggo; William Hulme; Richard Croker; John Parry; Frank Hester; Sam Harper; Ian J Douglas; Stephen J W Evans; Liam Smeeth; Ben Goldacre; Hannah Kuper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-07-14

10.  Mechanistic Analysis of Age-Related Clinical Manifestations in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Xu-Qiao Chen; Zhuo Xing; Quang-Di Chen; Richard J Salvi; Xuming Zhang; Benjamin Tycko; William C Mobley; Y Eugene Yu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.