| Literature DB >> 32703950 |
Ming-Chiang Chang1,2, Po-Hsun Ho3,4, Mao-Feng Tseng1,2, Fang-Yuan Lin1,5, Cheng-Hung Hou6, I-Kuan Lin7, Hsin Wang1,7, Pin-Pin Huang1,5, Chun-Hao Chiang7, Yueh-Chiang Yang2, I-Ta Wang7, He-Yun Du8, Cheng-Yen Wen9,7, Jing-Jong Shyue6, Chun-Wei Chen9,7, Kuei-Hsien Chen10, Po-Wen Chiu11,12, Li-Chyong Chen13,14.
Abstract
Most chemical vapor deposition methods for transition metal dichalcogenides use an extremely small amount of precursor to render large single-crystal flakes, which usually causes low coverage of the materials on the substrate. In this study, a self-capping vapor-liquid-solid reaction is proposed to fabricate large-grain, continuous MoS2 films. An intermediate liquid phase-Na2Mo2O7 is formed through a eutectic reaction of MoO3 and NaF, followed by being sulfurized into MoS2. The as-formed MoS2 seeds function as a capping layer that reduces the nucleation density and promotes lateral growth. By tuning the driving force of the reaction, large mono/bilayer (1.1 mm/200 μm) flakes or full-coverage films (with a record-high average grain size of 450 μm) can be grown on centimeter-scale substrates. The field-effect transistors fabricated from the full-coverage films show high mobility (33 and 49 cm2 V-1 s-1 for the mono and bilayer regions) and on/off ratio (1 ~ 5 × 108) across a 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm region.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32703950 PMCID: PMC7378841 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17517-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Schematics of SCVLS growth mechanism and the grown MoS2.
a Structure of the solid precursor used for the SCVLS method. b At growth temperature, MoO3 vaporized and penetrated through the SiO2 diffusion membrane. MoO3 and NaF reacted to form liquid-phase Na2Mo2O7 (colored in red) at the growth temperature. c Through reactive digging and the capillary effect, the liquid precursor gradually rose to the NaF matrix surface. d Sulfur vapor was introduced into the system and started to dissolve into the Na2Mo2O7 liquid. e Liquid precursor sulfurized into the MoS2 seed layer. f Capped by the MoS2, the emerging liquid was redirected horizontally and converted into MoS2 when it contacted and dissolved sulfur vapor at the edge of the MoS2 flakes. g A 1-mm MoS2 flake grown through the SCVLS method. Scale bar is 200 µm. h Magnified image of the MoS2 grain edge. The fringes at the edge indicate the presence of the liquid precursor during the growth process. Scale bar is 20 µm.
Fig. 2Characterization of the MoS2 monolayer and remaining solid precursors.
a Schematic of the sampling areas of XPS. XPS data of b Mo-3d and c S-2p on sites that were covered (black) and not covered (red) with MoS2. The broad peak of Mo-3d at sites that were not covered with MoS2 indicates the complex chemical environment of Mo below the surface. Insets in b and c are the Mo-3d and S-2p of the MoS2 film transferred onto a SiO2 substrate. d Raman spectra taken form positions with (black) and without (red) MoS2 coverage.
Fig. 3Driving forces of SCVLS reaction.
a Schematic of the vertical driving force and horizontal liquid transport. Optical microscopy images of MoS2 grown using b 2-nm c 5-nm, and d 7-nm MoO3 as a solid precursor. The growth time was 10 min. e 1-min growth using the same precursor sample as in d. The scale bars in b, d, and e are 200 µm and the one in c is 300 µm. f Average grain size and coverage of the MoS2 flakes as a function of MoO3 precursor thickness. g Comparison of SCVLS, VLS, and gas-phase CVD. SCVLS reaction enables a relatively large-grain size when a full-coverage film was achieved.
Fig. 4Dynamic effect on SCVLS method.
a Schematic of the timing of introducing sulfur vapor affecting the final growth product. b When sulfur vapor was introduced early, the Na2Mo2O7 precursor rapidly formed the MoS2 seed layer when exposed on the surface (left). When sulfur vapor was introduced later, the MoS2 seed layer was formed at the solid–liquid interface, thus leaving a droplet of the liquid precursor on top of the interface. This droplet was later sulfurized into the second layer of MoS2 (right). Optical images of the transferred c monolayer, d bilayer, and e trilayer MoS2. Scale bars are 50 µm. f Raman and g photoluminescence spectra of the monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer MoS2.
Fig. 5Transport properties of the MoS2 grown through the SCVLS method.
a Schematic image of a back-gate monolayer MoS2 transistor. b Optical image of a monolayer and bilayer FETs. Both scale bars are 5 µm. c Gate-dependent conductance of devices shown in b. d Temperature-dependent transport property of the monolayer MoS2 FET shown in b. A clear MIT is observed at V of 30 V. e V-dependent source-drain current density of the monolayer device at different gate voltages. The channel length is 1.48 μm. f Log plot of the gate-dependent current density of the short channel mono- and bilayer devices under an 8-V source-drain bias. The on/off ratio is 5 × 108.
Comparison of the different CVD methods.
| Growth method | Maximum grain size (single crystal) | Mobility (cm2 V−1 S−1) | Maximum current density (μA μm−1) | On/off ratio | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVD MoS2 (MoO3 + S, substrate control)[ | 200 μm | 25 | 107 | ACS Nano 2015, 9, 4611 | |
| CVD MoS2 (MoO3 + S, flow control)[ | 300 μm | 30 | 106 | Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500033 | |
| CVD MoS2 (MoCl5 + DMS, NaCl catalyst)[ | 50 μm | 10.4 | 107 | Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 465103 | |
| CVD MoS2 (MoO3 + S, molten Na:glass)[ | 563 μm | 24 | 123 | 109 | Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 202103 |
| CVD MoS2 (MoO3 + S with PTAS salt)[ | 200 μm | 35 | 270 | 107 | Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 4516 |
| CVD MoS2 (Mo foil + S, soda–lime glass)[ | 400 μm | 11.4 | 106 | Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 979 | |
| SCVLS MoS2 | 1.1 mm | 33 | 230 | 5 × 108 | This work |
All transport data were obtained from the back-gate, monolayer MoS2 FETs for comparison.
Fig. 6Transport properties of the large-grain, continuous film.
a Photo-image of the as-fabricated FETs across a 1.5 × 1.5-cm region. b Optical image of FET devices. The scale bar is 150 μm. The fine feature is shown in Supplementary Fig. 18. c Gate-dependent conductance of the devices across the large area.