INTRODUCTION: The scope of complications arising after radiotherapy (RT) treatment for prostate cancer is under-recognized and not well-described. The objective of this study is to describe the presentation, scope, and management of genitourinary (GU) complications in patients referred for high-grade urethral complications or sphincter weakness incontinence after prostate RT. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients referred to a reconstructive urologist for management of grade 4 urethral complications and sphincter weakness incontinence after prostate RT from December 2004 to December 2015. Patients' signs, symptoms, complications, and treatments are described. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were identified, with a mean age of 67.8 years; 55.8% (n=67) received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 38.3% (n=46) brachytherapy (BT), and 5.8% (n=7) combination RT. The mean time to first complication after RT was 57.7 months (1-219) and number of complications per patient was 5.1±2.2. The most common associated complications were urethral stenosis (n=106, 88.3%), sphincter weakness urinary incontinence (n=55, 45.8%), radiation cystitis (n=61, 50.8%), refractory storage lower urinary tract symptoms (n=106, 88.3%), GU pain (n=28, 23.3%), and prostate necrosis/abscess (n=17, 14.2%). Patients required a mean of 7.4±4.4 treatments over a 33-month period, including urethral dilation/urethrotomy (n= 93, 77.5%), urethroplasty (n=53, 44.2%), transurethral resection (n=52, 43.3%), cystolithopaxy (n=14, 11.7%), artificial urinary sphincter (n=8, 6.7%), and urinary diversion (n=8, 6.7%). Patients with RT combined with other modalities had more complications (6.2 vs. 4.2, p=0.001), higher rates of incontinence (93.8% vs. 29.5%, p=0.001), necrosis (31.3% vs. 8.0%, p=0.003), erectile dysfunction (84.4% vs. 51.1%, p=0.001), and hematuria (59.4% vs. 36.4%, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Urethral complications related to prostate RT are seldom an isolated problem and require a substantial amount of urological resources and interventions.
INTRODUCTION: The scope of complications arising after radiotherapy (RT) treatment for prostate cancer is under-recognized and not well-described. The objective of this study is to describe the presentation, scope, and management of genitourinary (GU) complications in patients referred for high-grade urethral complications or sphincter weakness incontinence after prostate RT. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients referred to a reconstructive urologist for management of grade 4 urethral complications and sphincter weakness incontinence after prostate RT from December 2004 to December 2015. Patients' signs, symptoms, complications, and treatments are described. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were identified, with a mean age of 67.8 years; 55.8% (n=67) received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 38.3% (n=46) brachytherapy (BT), and 5.8% (n=7) combination RT. The mean time to first complication after RT was 57.7 months (1-219) and number of complications per patient was 5.1±2.2. The most common associated complications were urethral stenosis (n=106, 88.3%), sphincter weakness urinary incontinence (n=55, 45.8%), radiation cystitis (n=61, 50.8%), refractory storage lower urinary tract symptoms (n=106, 88.3%), GU pain (n=28, 23.3%), and prostate necrosis/abscess (n=17, 14.2%). Patients required a mean of 7.4±4.4 treatments over a 33-month period, including urethral dilation/urethrotomy (n= 93, 77.5%), urethroplasty (n=53, 44.2%), transurethral resection (n=52, 43.3%), cystolithopaxy (n=14, 11.7%), artificial urinary sphincter (n=8, 6.7%), and urinary diversion (n=8, 6.7%). Patients with RT combined with other modalities had more complications (6.2 vs. 4.2, p=0.001), higher rates of incontinence (93.8% vs. 29.5%, p=0.001), necrosis (31.3% vs. 8.0%, p=0.003), erectile dysfunction (84.4% vs. 51.1%, p=0.001), and hematuria (59.4% vs. 36.4%, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Urethral complications related to prostate RT are seldom an isolated problem and require a substantial amount of urological resources and interventions.
Authors: Christopher J D Wallis; Adam Glaser; Jim C Hu; Hartwig Huland; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Daniel Moon; Declan G Murphy; Paul L Nguyen; Matthew J Resnick; Robert K Nam Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-06-11 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ruud C Wortel; Luca Incrocci; Floris J Pos; Uulke A van der Heide; Joos V Lebesque; Shafak Aluwini; Marnix G Witte; Wilma D Heemsbergen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Robert K Nam; Patrick Cheung; Sender Herschorn; Refik Saskin; Jiandong Su; Laurence H Klotz; Michelle Chang; Girish S Kulkarni; Yuna Lee; Ronald T Kodama; Steven A Narod Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Mohannad A Awad; Thomas W Gaither; E Charles Osterberg; Gregory P Murphy; Nima Baradaran; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Christopher J D Wallis; Sender Herschorn; Refik Saskin; Jiandong Su; Laurence H Klotz; Michelle Chang; Girish S Kulkarni; Yuna Lee; Ronald T Kodama; Steven A Narod; Robert K Nam Journal: Urology Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.649