Literature DB >> 35302475

The evolution of urethral stricture and urethroplasty practice over 15 years: A single-center, single-surgeon, 1319 urethroplasty analysis.

Dylan T Hoare1, R Christopher Doiron1,2, Keith F Rourke1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The management of urethral stricture has evolved over the last several decades. We sought to analyze urethral stricture and urethroplasty trends at a tertiary referral center over a 15-year period.
METHODS: Patients undergoing urethroplasty by a single surgeon from August 2003 to July 2018 were analyzed. Patient demographics, urethroplasty techniques, and outcomes were collected in a prospectively maintained database and were categorized into three five-year tertiles based on date of surgery. These tertiles were subsequently retrospectively analyzed for trends and changes in practice.
RESULTS: A total of 1319 urethroplasties were completed over the study period. During the first five years (T1), 299 urethroplasties were performed, with 431 and 589 performed in T2 and T3, respectively. Mean overall patient age was 46.8 years, which increased significantly over time (p<0.001). Idiopathic strictures were most common (n=516, 39.1%) and unchanged over time, while proportionately radiation-induced strictures increased (n=9, 3.0% [T1], n=22, 5.1% [T2], n=51, 8.7% [T3]; p=0.001) as did iatrogenic and lichen sclerosus strictures. Mean stricture length (4.7 cm [T1], 4.8 cm [T2], 4.0 cm [T3]; p<0.001) and the mean number of prior endoscopic procedures (3.4 [T1], 3.9 [T2], and 2.5 [T3]; p<0.001] decreased over time. Single-stage urethroplasty with buccal mucosa was the most common technique performed (n=656, 49.7%) that increased in prevalence (p=0.009), while both flap and staged techniques decreased (p=0.008, p=0.004, respectively). Overall success rate was 90.1% (n=1106), which improved significantly with time (n=248, 86.7% [T1], n=359, 90.0% [T2], n=499, 93.4% [T3]; p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We observed that patients and treatment of urethral stricture evolved over 15 years in practice, with an increase in patient age, radiation, and iatrogenic and lichen sclerosus strictures, while demonstrating a decrease in stricture length and the number of prior endoscopic procedures performed. Increased use of single-stage urethroplasty using buccal mucosa was observed, which may have contributed to an increase in urethroplasty success over time.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35302475      PMCID: PMC9343167          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   2.052


  23 in total

Review 1.  SIU/ICUD Consultation on Urethral Strictures: Dilation, internal urethrotomy, and stenting of male anterior urethral strictures.

Authors:  Jill C Buckley; Chris Heyns; Peter Gilling; Jeff Carney
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial).

Authors:  Beatriz Goulao; Sonya Carnell; Jing Shen; Graeme MacLennan; John Norrie; Jonathan Cook; Elaine McColl; Matt Breckons; Luke Vale; Paul Whybrow; Tim Rapley; Rebecca Forbes; Stephanie Currer; Mark Forrest; Jennifer Wilkinson; Daniela Andrich; Stewart Barclay; Anthony Mundy; James N'Dow; Stephen Payne; Nick Watkin; Robert Pickard
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Trends in urethral stricture management over two decades.

Authors:  Stephen McGeorge; Amanda Chung; Devang J Desai
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  The future of urology.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Maurizio Brausi; Stefan Buntrock; Thomas Ebert; Hashim Hashim; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Jean-Jacques Wyndaele
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Urethral Reconstruction in Aging Male Patients.

Authors:  Boyd R Viers; Travis J Pagliara; Charles A Rew; Lauren Folgosa-Cooley; Christine Y Shiang; Jeremy M Scott; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Trends in the management of male urethral stricture disease in the veteran population.

Authors:  John M Lacy; Maximiliano Cavallini; Jason R Bylund; Stephen E Strup; David M Preston
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa versus penile skin flap urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures: results from a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Deepak Dubey; Vivek Vijjan; Rakesh Kapoor; Aneesh Srivastava; Anil Mandhani; Anant Kumar; M S Ansari
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on male urethral stricture.

Authors:  Keith F Rourke; Blayne Welk; Ron Kodama; Greg Bailly; Tim Davies; Nancy Santesso; Philippe D Violette
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 9.  Imaging of urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Conrad Maciejewski; Keith Rourke
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-02

10.  Endoscopic treatments prior to urethroplasty: trends in management of urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Matthew J Moynihan; Bryan Voelzke; Jeremy Myers; Benjamin N Breyer; Bradley Erickson; Sean P Elliott; Nejd Alsikafi; Jill Buckley; Lee Zhao; Thomas Smith; Alex J Vanni
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.