Literature DB >> 25733275

Complications after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results of a population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.

Christopher J D Wallis1, Sender Herschorn1, Refik Saskin2, Jiandong Su2, Laurence H Klotz1, Michelle Chang1, Girish S Kulkarni3, Yuna Lee4, Ronald T Kodama1, Steven A Narod5, Robert K Nam6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess rates of treatment-related complications after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy monotherapy, using propensity score matching to account for baseline differences between these patient populations.
METHODS: On the basis of a population-based study of men undergoing surgery or radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Ontario between 2002 and 2009, we undertook a propensity score-matched analysis including age, comorbidity, and year of treatment to assess treatment-related complication end points. These included hospital admission; urologic, rectal, or anal procedures; open surgeries; and secondary malignancies.
RESULTS: From the original cohort of 32,465 patients, 15,870 (48.9%) had surgery and 16,595 (51.1%) had radiation. Propensity score matching produced 8797 pairs (17,594 patients). Among these, when compared with patients treated with surgery, those treated with radiation experienced fewer admissions to hospital (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.92) and urologic procedures (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.46-0.53) at year 1 but higher rates at year 3 (HR, 5.65; 95% CI, 4.61-6.91 and HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.62-2.13, respectively) and year 5. Although there was no significant difference in open surgeries at year 1, patients undergoing radiotherapy were at higher risk by year 3 (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.23-3.47) and this rose by year 5. Over the study period, patients undergoing radiotherapy experienced more rectal-anal procedures (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 2.37-2.95) and were diagnosed with more secondary malignancies (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.16-5.14). Direct matching produced similar results.
CONCLUSION: From a propensity score-matched analysis, we found that patients undergoing radiation therapy for prostate cancer had higher rates of long-term complications in all 5 categories studied than patients undergoing surgery.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733275     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  [Primum nil nocere].

Authors:  C Roloff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Second neoplasms after percutaneous radiotherapy].

Authors:  F Haidl; D Pfister; R Semrau; A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The scope, presentation, and management of genitourinary complications in patients presenting with high-grade urethral complications after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Christopher Doiron; Jon Witten; Keith F Rourke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  The cost of treatment and its related complications for men who receive surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alaina Garbens; Christopher J D Wallis; Rano Matta; Ronald Kodama; Sender Herschorn; Steven Narod; Robert K Nam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Effect of radical prostatectomy surgeon volume on complication rates from a large population-based cohort.

Authors:  Ashraf Almatar; Christopher J D Wallis; Sender Herschorn; Refik Saskin; Girish S Kulkarni; Ronald T Kodama; Robert K Nam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments for patient-centered outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA Compliant).

Authors:  Ravishankar Jayadevappa; Sumedha Chhatre; Yu-Ning Wong; Marsha N Wittink; Ratna Cook; Knashawn H Morales; Neha Vapiwala; Diane K Newman; Thomas Guzzo; Alan J Wein; Stanley B Malkowicz; David I Lee; Jerome S Schwartz; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer: what is really needed to move from investigational to valid therapeutic alternative?-a narrative review.

Authors:  Antony Pellegrino; Giuseppe O Cirulli; Elio Mazzone; Francesco Barletta; Simone Scuderi; Mario de Angelis; Giuseppe Rosiello; Giorgio Gandaglia; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Armando Stabile
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

Review 8.  Second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J D Wallis; Alyson L Mahar; Richard Choo; Sender Herschorn; Ronald T Kodama; Prakesh S Shah; Cyril Danjoux; Steven A Narod; Robert K Nam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-03-02

9.  Assessment of Secondary Sarcomas Among Patients With Cancer of the Abdomen or Pelvis Who Received Combinations of Surgery, Radiation, and Chemotherapy vs Surgery Alone.

Authors:  Amanda E Hird; Diana E Magee; Rano Matta; Refik Saskin; Erind Dvorani; Girish S Kulkarni; Ronald Kodama; Sender Herschorn; Steven A Narod; Robert K Nam
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.