Douglas Yee1, Angela M DeMichele2, Christina Yau3, Claudine Isaacs4, W Fraser Symmans5, Kathy S Albain6, Yunn-Yi Chen7, Gregor Krings7, Shi Wei8, Shuko Harada8, Brian Datnow9, Oluwole Fadare9, Molly Klein10, Stefan Pambuccian11, Beiyun Chen12, Kathi Adamson13, Sharon Sams14, Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia15, Anthony Magliocco16, Mike Feldman17, Mara Rendi18, Husain Sattar19, Jay Zeck20, Idris T Ocal21, Ossama Tawfik22, Lauren Grasso LeBeau23, Sunati Sahoo24, Tuyethoa Vinh25, A Jo Chien26, Andres Forero-Torres27, Erica Stringer-Reasor27, Anne M Wallace28, Lajos Pusztai29, Judy C Boughey30, Erin D Ellis31, Anthony D Elias32, Janice Lu33, Julie E Lang34, Hyo S Han35, Amy S Clark2, Rita Nanda36, Donald W Northfelt37, Qamar J Khan38, Rebecca K Viscusi39, David M Euhus40, Kirsten K Edmiston41, Stephen Y Chui42, Kathleen Kemmer43, John W Park26, Minetta C Liu44, Olufunmilayo Olopade36, Brian Leyland-Jones45, Debasish Tripathy46, Stacy L Moulder46, Hope S Rugo26, Richard Schwab47, Shelly Lo48, Teresa Helsten47, Heather Beckwith1, Patricia Haugen49, Nola M Hylton50, Laura J Van't Veer51, Jane Perlmutter52, Michelle E Melisko26, Amy Wilson53, Garry Peterson3, Adam L Asare53, Meredith B Buxton54, Melissa Paoloni54, Julia L Clennell54, Gillian L Hirst3, Ruby Singhrao3, Katherine Steeg3, Jeffrey B Matthews3, Smita M Asare53, Ashish Sanil54, Scott M Berry54, Laura J Esserman3, Donald A Berry54. 1. Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 3. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco. 4. Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. 5. Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 6. Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 7. Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco. 8. Department of Pathology, University of Alabama Birmingham. 9. Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego. 10. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 11. Department of Pathology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 12. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota. 13. Department of Pathology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington. 14. Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver. 15. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 16. Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. 17. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 18. Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle. 19. Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 20. Department of Pathology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. 21. Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, Arizona. 22. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas, Lawrence. 23. Department of Pathology, University of Arizona, Tucson. 24. Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas. 25. Inova Pathology Institute, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia. 26. Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Francisco. 27. Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham. 28. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego. 29. Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut. 30. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota. 31. Medical Oncology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington. 32. Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver. 33. Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 34. Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 35. Medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. 36. Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 37. Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, Arizona. 38. Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Lawrence. 39. Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson. 40. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 41. Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia. 42. Genentech, South San Francisco, California. 43. Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. 44. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota. 45. Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. 46. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 47. Medical Oncology, University of California, San Diego. 48. Medical Oncology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 49. National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC. 50. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco. 51. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. 52. Gemini Group, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 53. Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, California. 54. Berry Consultants, LLC, Austin, Texas.
Abstract
Importance: Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a known prognostic biomarker for long-term outcomes. The I-SPY2 trial evaluated if the strength of this clinical association persists in the context of a phase 2 neoadjuvant platform trial. Objective: To evaluate the association of pCR with event-free survival (EFS) and pCR with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) in subpopulations of women with high-risk operable breast cancer treated with standard therapy or one of several novel agents. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter platform trial of women with operable clinical stage 2 or 3 breast cancer with no prior surgery or systemic therapy for breast cancer; primary tumors were 2.5 cm or larger. Women with tumors that were ERBB2 negative/hormone receptor (HR) positive with low 70-gene assay score were excluded. Participants were adaptively randomized to one of several different investigational regimens or control therapy within molecular subtypes from March 2010 through 2016. The analysis included participants with follow-up data available as of February 26, 2019. Interventions: Standard-of-care neoadjuvant therapy consisting of taxane treatment with or without (as control) one of several investigational agents or combinations followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pathologic complete response and 3-year EFS and DRFS. Results: Of the 950 participants (median [range] age, 49 [23-77] years), 330 (34.7%) achieved pCR. Three-year EFS and DRFS for patients who achieved pCR were both 95%. Hazard ratios for pCR vs non-pCR were 0.19 for EFS (95% CI, 0.12-0.31) and 0.21 for DRFS (95% CI, 0.13-0.34) and were similar across molecular subtypes, varying from 0.14 to 0.18 for EFS and 0.10 to 0.20 for DRFS. Conclusions and Relevance: The 3-year outcomes from the I-SPY2 trial show that, regardless of subtype and/or treatment regimen, including 9 novel therapeutic combinations, achieving pCR after neoadjuvant therapy implies approximately an 80% reduction in recurrence rate. The goal of the I-SPY2 trial is to rapidly identify investigational therapies that may improve pCR when validated in a phase 3 confirmatory trial. Whether pCR is a validated surrogate in the sense that a therapy that improves pCR rate can be assumed to also improve long-term outcome requires further study. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01042379.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a known prognostic biomarker for long-term outcomes. The I-SPY2 trial evaluated if the strength of this clinical association persists in the context of a phase 2 neoadjuvant platform trial. Objective: To evaluate the association of pCR with event-free survival (EFS) and pCR with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) in subpopulations of women with high-risk operable breast cancer treated with standard therapy or one of several novel agents. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter platform trial of women with operable clinical stage 2 or 3 breast cancer with no prior surgery or systemic therapy for breast cancer; primary tumors were 2.5 cm or larger. Women with tumors that were ERBB2 negative/hormone receptor (HR) positive with low 70-gene assay score were excluded. Participants were adaptively randomized to one of several different investigational regimens or control therapy within molecular subtypes from March 2010 through 2016. The analysis included participants with follow-up data available as of February 26, 2019. Interventions: Standard-of-care neoadjuvant therapy consisting of taxane treatment with or without (as control) one of several investigational agents or combinations followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pathologic complete response and 3-year EFS and DRFS. Results: Of the 950 participants (median [range] age, 49 [23-77] years), 330 (34.7%) achieved pCR. Three-year EFS and DRFS for patients who achieved pCR were both 95%. Hazard ratios for pCR vs non-pCR were 0.19 for EFS (95% CI, 0.12-0.31) and 0.21 for DRFS (95% CI, 0.13-0.34) and were similar across molecular subtypes, varying from 0.14 to 0.18 for EFS and 0.10 to 0.20 for DRFS. Conclusions and Relevance: The 3-year outcomes from the I-SPY2 trial show that, regardless of subtype and/or treatment regimen, including 9 novel therapeutic combinations, achieving pCR after neoadjuvant therapy implies approximately an 80% reduction in recurrence rate. The goal of the I-SPY2 trial is to rapidly identify investigational therapies that may improve pCR when validated in a phase 3 confirmatory trial. Whether pCR is a validated surrogate in the sense that a therapy that improves pCR rate can be assumed to also improve long-term outcome requires further study. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01042379.
Authors: John W Park; Minetta C Liu; Douglas Yee; Christina Yau; Laura J van 't Veer; W Fraser Symmans; Melissa Paoloni; Jane Perlmutter; Nola M Hylton; Michael Hogarth; Angela DeMichele; Meredith B Buxton; A Jo Chien; Anne M Wallace; Judy C Boughey; Tufia C Haddad; Stephen Y Chui; Kathleen A Kemmer; Henry G Kaplan; Claudine Isaacs; Rita Nanda; Debasish Tripathy; Kathy S Albain; Kirsten K Edmiston; Anthony D Elias; Donald W Northfelt; Lajos Pusztai; Stacy L Moulder; Julie E Lang; Rebecca K Viscusi; David M Euhus; Barbara B Haley; Qamar J Khan; William C Wood; Michelle Melisko; Richard Schwab; Teresa Helsten; Julia Lyandres; Sarah E Davis; Gillian L Hirst; Ashish Sanil; Laura J Esserman; Donald A Berry Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend Journal: Nature Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sibylle Loibl; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Michael Untch; William M Sikov; Hope S Rugo; Mark D McKee; Jens Huober; Mehra Golshan; Gunter von Minckwitz; David Maag; Danielle Sullivan; Norman Wolmark; Kristi McIntyre; Jose J Ponce Lorenzo; Otto Metzger Filho; Priya Rastogi; W Fraser Symmans; Xuan Liu; Charles E Geyer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Fatima Cardoso; Laura J van't Veer; Jan Bogaerts; Leen Slaets; Giuseppe Viale; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Yves Pierga; Etienne Brain; Sylvain Causeret; Mauro DeLorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Theodora Goulioti; Susan Knox; Erika Matos; Bart Meulemans; Peter A Neijenhuis; Ulrike Nitz; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Christos Sotiriou; Lisette Stork; Carolyn Straehle; Geraldine Thomas; Alastair M Thompson; Jacobus M van der Hoeven; Peter Vuylsteke; René Bernards; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Emiel Rutgers; Martine Piccart Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Roy E Smith; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Ann M Brown; Andre Robidoux; Richard Margolese; Morton S Kahlenberg; Soonmyung Paik; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-04-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Fisher; J Bryant; N Wolmark; E Mamounas; A Brown; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; M Begovic; A DeCillis; A Robidoux; R G Margolese; A B Cruz; J L Hoehn; A W Lees; N V Dimitrov; H D Bear Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gunter von Minckwitz; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Max S Mano; Sibylle Loibl; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Michael Untch; Norman Wolmark; Priya Rastogi; Andreas Schneeweiss; Andres Redondo; Hans H Fischer; William Jacot; Alison K Conlin; Claudia Arce-Salinas; Irene L Wapnir; Christian Jackisch; Michael P DiGiovanna; Peter A Fasching; John P Crown; Pia Wülfing; Zhimin Shao; Elena Rota Caremoli; Haiyan Wu; Lisa H Lam; David Tesarowski; Melanie Smitt; Hannah Douthwaite; Stina M Singel; Charles E Geyer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Denise M Wolf; Christina Yau; Julia Wulfkuhle; Lamorna Brown-Swigart; Rosa I Gallagher; Pei Rong Evelyn Lee; Zelos Zhu; Mark J Magbanua; Rosalyn Sayaman; Nicholas O'Grady; Amrita Basu; Amy Delson; Jean Philippe Coppé; Ruixiao Lu; Jerome Braun; Smita M Asare; Laura Sit; Jeffrey B Matthews; Jane Perlmutter; Nola Hylton; Minetta C Liu; Paula Pohlmann; W Fraser Symmans; Hope S Rugo; Claudine Isaacs; Angela M DeMichele; Douglas Yee; Donald A Berry; Lajos Pusztai; Emanuel F Petricoin; Gillian L Hirst; Laura J Esserman; Laura J van 't Veer Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 38.585
Authors: Vladimir Semiglazov; Andrey Tseluiko; Asel Kudaybergenova; Anna Artemyeva; Petr Krivorotko; Roman Donskih Journal: Cancer Biol Med Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 5.347
Authors: Adrienne G Waks; Neelam V Desai; Tianyu Li; Philip D Poorvu; Ann H Partridge; Natalie Sinclair; Laura M Spring; Meredith Faggen; Michael Constantine; Otto Metzger; Jillian Alberti; Julia Deane; Shoshana M Rosenberg; Elizabeth Frank; Sara M Tolaney; Ian E Krop; Nadine M Tung; Nabihah Tayob; Tari A King; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Eric P Winer Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2022-05-10
Authors: Julia Foldi; Mariya Rozenblit; Tristen S Park; Christin A Knowlton; Mehra Golshan; Meena Moran; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2021-07-02
Authors: Ingrid A Mayer; Fengmin Zhao; Carlos L Arteaga; William F Symmans; Ben H Park; Brian L Burnette; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Sofia F Garcia; Karen L Smith; Della F Makower; Margaret Block; Kimberly A Morley; Chirag R Jani; Craig Mescher; Shabana J Dewani; Bernard Tawfik; Lisa E Flaum; Erica L Mayer; William M Sikov; Eve T Rodler; Lynne I Wagner; Angela M DeMichele; Joseph A Sparano; Antonio C Wolff; Kathy D Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Sarah Nietz; Daniel S O'Neil; Oluwatosin Ayeni; Wenlong Carl Chen; Maureen Joffe; Judith S Jacobson; Alfred I Neugut; Paul Ruff; Witness Mapanga; Ines Buccimazza; Urishka Singh; Sharon Čačala; Laura Stopforth; Boitumelo Phakathi; Tobias Chirwa; Herbert Cubasch Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 4.872