Literature DB >> 27406346

Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer.

John W Park1, Minetta C Liu1, Douglas Yee1, Christina Yau1, Laura J van 't Veer1, W Fraser Symmans1, Melissa Paoloni1, Jane Perlmutter1, Nola M Hylton1, Michael Hogarth1, Angela DeMichele1, Meredith B Buxton1, A Jo Chien1, Anne M Wallace1, Judy C Boughey1, Tufia C Haddad1, Stephen Y Chui1, Kathleen A Kemmer1, Henry G Kaplan1, Claudine Isaacs1, Rita Nanda1, Debasish Tripathy1, Kathy S Albain1, Kirsten K Edmiston1, Anthony D Elias1, Donald W Northfelt1, Lajos Pusztai1, Stacy L Moulder1, Julie E Lang1, Rebecca K Viscusi1, David M Euhus1, Barbara B Haley1, Qamar J Khan1, William C Wood1, Michelle Melisko1, Richard Schwab1, Teresa Helsten1, Julia Lyandres1, Sarah E Davis1, Gillian L Hirst1, Ashish Sanil1, Laura J Esserman1, Donald A Berry1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of breast cancer makes identifying effective therapies challenging. The I-SPY 2 trial, a multicenter, adaptive phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk clinical stage II or III breast cancer, evaluated multiple new agents added to standard chemotherapy to assess the effects on rates of pathological complete response (i.e., absence of residual cancer in the breast or lymph nodes at the time of surgery).
METHODS: We used adaptive randomization to compare standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus the tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib with control. Eligible women were categorized according to eight biomarker subtypes on the basis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, hormone-receptor status, and risk according to a 70-gene profile. Neratinib was evaluated against control with regard to 10 biomarker signatures (prospectively defined combinations of subtypes). The primary end point was pathological complete response. Volume changes on serial magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess the likelihood of such a response in each patient. Adaptive assignment to experimental groups within each disease subtype was based on Bayesian probabilities of the superiority of the treatment over control. Enrollment in the experimental group was stopped when the 85% Bayesian predictive probability of success in a confirmatory phase 3 trial of neoadjuvant therapy reached a prespecified threshold for any biomarker signature ("graduation"). Enrollment was stopped for futility if the probability fell to below 10% for every biomarker signature.
RESULTS: Neratinib reached the prespecified efficacy threshold with regard to the HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative signature. Among patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative cancer, the mean estimated rate of pathological complete response was 56% (95% Bayesian probability interval [PI], 37 to 73%) among 115 patients in the neratinib group, as compared with 33% among 78 controls (95% PI, 11 to 54%). The final predictive probability of success in phase 3 testing was 79%.
CONCLUSIONS: Neratinib added to standard therapy was highly likely to result in higher rates of pathological complete response than standard chemotherapy with trastuzumab among patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer. (Funded by QuantumLeap Healthcare Collaborative and others; I-SPY 2 TRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01042379.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27406346      PMCID: PMC5259558          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  23 in total

1.  Accelerating identification and regulatory approval of investigational cancer drugs.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Janet Woodcock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Pathological complete response and accelerated drug approval in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Tatiana M Prowell; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Donald A Berry; Angela DeMichele; Lisa Carey; Sarah E Davis; Meredith Buxton; Cliff Hudis; Joe W Gray; Charles Perou; Christina Yau; Chad Livasy; Helen Krontiras; Leslie Montgomery; Debasish Tripathy; Constance Lehman; Minetta C Liu; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Hope S Rugo; John T Carpenter; Lynn Dressler; David Chhieng; Baljit Singh; Carolyn Mies; Joseph Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Dilip Giri; Laura van 't Veer; Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Adaptive clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  Donald A Berry
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Luca Gianni; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Young-Hyuck Im; Laslo Roman; Ling-Ming Tseng; Mei-Ching Liu; Ana Lluch; Elżbieta Staroslawska; Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez; Seock-Ah Im; Jose Luiz Pedrini; Brigitte Poirier; Paolo Morandi; Vladimir Semiglazov; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Giulia Bianchi; Tania Szado; Jayantha Ratnayake; Graham Ross; Pinuccia Valagussa
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  The Brave New World of clinical cancer research: Adaptive biomarker-driven trials integrating clinical practice with clinical research.

Authors:  Donald A Berry
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Phase I study of neratinib in combination with temsirolimus in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-dependent and other solid tumors.

Authors:  Leena Gandhi; Rastislav Bahleda; Sara M Tolaney; Eunice L Kwak; James M Cleary; Shuchi S Pandya; Antoine Hollebecque; Richat Abbas; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Anna Berkenblit; Mizue Krygowski; Yali Liang; Kathleen W Turnbull; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jean-Charles Soria
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  A systematic review of dual targeting in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Iben Kümler; Malgorzata K Tuxen; Dorte Lisbet Nielsen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  111 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients with cT3 Breast Cancer with Good Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Results in Excellent Local Control: A Comprehensive Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Marieke E M van der Noordaa; Ileana Ioan; Emiel J Rutgers; Erik van Werkhoven; Claudette E Loo; Rosie Voorthuis; Jelle Wesseling; Japke van Urk; Terry Wiersma; Vincent Dezentje; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Adaptive Clinical Trials: Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Adaptive Design Elements.

Authors:  Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Precision medicine needs randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Everardo D Saad; Xavier Paoletti; Tomasz Burzykowski; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Lessons learned from BATTLE-2 in the war on cancer: the use of Bayesian method in clinical trial design.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

6.  Sepsis: who will shoot first? Pharma or diagnostics?

Authors:  Julien Textoris; Anthony C Gordon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Precision medicine for urothelial bladder cancer: update on tumour genomics and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Kenneth M Felsenstein; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  To add or not to add a new treatment arm to a multiarm study: A decision-theoretic framework.

Authors:  Kim May Lee; James Wason; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The identification of challenges in tissue collection for biomarker studies: the Q-CROC-03 neoadjuvant breast cancer translational trial experience.

Authors:  Adriana Aguilar-Mahecha; Josiane Lafleur; Manuela Pelmus; Carole Seguin; Cathy Lan; Federico Discepola; Bojan Kovacina; Rosa Christodoulopoulos; Ombretta Salvucci; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Josée-Anne Roy; André Robidoux; Elizabeth A Marcus; Gerald Batist; Mark Basik
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Challenges and Opportunities in Adapting Clinical Trial Design for Immunotherapies.

Authors:  Lillian L Siu; S Percy Ivy; Erica L Dixon; Amy E Gravell; Steven A Reeves; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.