Literature DB >> 32700167

More exploratory house mice judge an ambiguous situation more negatively.

Aurélie Verjat1, Paul Devienne2, Heiko G Rödel2, Christophe Féron2.   

Abstract

Exploration tendency, one of the most investigated animal personality traits, may be driven by either positive (when seeking interesting information) or negative (to reduce the uncertainty of the environment) affective/emotional profiles. To disentangle the valence of the affective state associated with exploration trait, we applied a judgment bias test to evaluate the animals' responses in an ambiguous situation, allowing an assessment of their affective state or mood. Experiments were carried out in male house mice (Mus musculus) of wild origin. Individual differences in exploration tendency were assessed by repeated open field and novel object tests. To evaluate the animals' judgment bias, we trained the subjects for 8 days in a 3-arm maze to discriminate between two extreme locations (outer arms: either positively reinforced with sugary water or less-positively reinforced with plain water), in terms of a shorter latency to approach the positively reinforced arm. After this learning criterion was reached, we repeatedly tested their responses to an ambiguous location (intermediate arm). The latencies to approach and consume the ambiguous reward were highly repeatable over the 3 days of testing; hence individuals expressed a stable judgment bias. Most importantly, more exploratory animals showed a more negative judgment bias, which supports the hypothesis that a higher exploration tendency was associated with a negative affective state. Further studies should investigate whether exploration in different situations might be due to distinct affective states.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective state; Animal personality; Cognitive judgment bias; Curiosity; Exploration; Mus musculus

Year:  2020        PMID: 32700167     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01414-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  39 in total

1.  A theory of human curiosity.

Authors:  D E BERLYNE
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1954-08

2.  Bottlenose dolphins engaging in more social affiliative behaviour judge ambiguous cues more optimistically.

Authors:  Isabella L K Clegg; Heiko G Rödel; Fabienne Delfour
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring?

Authors:  Alecia J Carter; William E Feeney; Harry H Marshall; Guy Cowlishaw; Robert Heinsohn
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2012-12-18

Review 4.  Untangling the neurobiology of coping styles in rodents: Towards neural mechanisms underlying individual differences in disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Sietse F de Boer; Bauke Buwalda; Jaap M Koolhaas
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Differences between fast and slow explorers in short-term tail temperature responses to handling in a rodent of wild origin.

Authors:  Margaux Duparcq; Océane Jean; Aurélie Verjat; Ludivine Jaravel; Daphné Jacquet; Franco Robles Guerrero; Christophe Féron; Heiko G Rödel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  The SEEKING mind: primal neuro-affective substrates for appetitive incentive states and their pathological dynamics in addictions and depression.

Authors:  Antonio Alcaro; Jaak Panksepp
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Individual coping characteristics, rearing conditions and behavioural flexibility in pigs.

Authors:  J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Willem G P Schouten; John A de Leeuw; Johan W Schrama; Victor M Wiegant
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Individual differences in exploratory activity relate to cognitive judgement bias in carpenter ants.

Authors:  Patrizia d'Ettorre; Claudio Carere; Lara Demora; Pauline Le Quinquis; Lisa Signorotti; Dalila Bovet
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Mood and personality interact to determine cognitive biases in pigs.

Authors:  Lucy Asher; Mary Friel; Kym Griffin; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 10.  Lifetime development of behavioural phenotype in the house mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Vera Brust; Philipp M Schindler; Lars Lewejohann
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.172

View more
  2 in total

1.  Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.

Authors:  Marko Bračić; Lena Bohn; Viktoria Siewert; Vanessa T von Kortzfleisch; Holger Schielzeth; Sylvia Kaiser; Norbert Sachser; S Helene Richter
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.087

2.  Judgement bias of group housed gestating sows predicted by behavioral traits, but not physical measures of welfare.

Authors:  Kristina M Horback; Thomas D Parsons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.