Literature DB >> 27688007

Individual differences in exploratory activity relate to cognitive judgement bias in carpenter ants.

Patrizia d'Ettorre1, Claudio Carere2, Lara Demora2, Pauline Le Quinquis2, Lisa Signorotti2, Dalila Bovet3.   

Abstract

Emotional state may influence cognitive processes such as attention and decision-making. A cognitive judgement bias is the propensity to anticipate either positive or negative consequences in response to ambiguous information. Recent work, mainly on vertebrates, showed that the response to ambiguous stimuli might change depending on an individual's affective state, which is influenced by e.g. the social and physical environment. However, the response to ambiguous stimuli could also be affected by the individual's behavioural type (personality), a question that has been under-investigated. We studied the link between individual differences in exploratory activity and the response to an ambiguous stimulus in the ant Camponotus aethiops. Exploratory behaviour, quantified with an open-field test, was variable among individuals but consistent over time within individuals. Individual ants learned to associate a spatial position to a reinforcement and another spatial position to a punishment. Once the ants had acquired this discrimination, cognitive judgement bias was tested with the stimulus in an intermediate position. Fast explorers in the open-field took significantly more time to approach the ambiguous stimulus compared to slow explorers, suggesting a negative judgement bias for fast explorers and a positive bias for slow explorers. This previously unknown link between individual difference in exploratory activity and cognitive bias in a social insect may help understanding the evolution and organization of social life.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective state; Cognition; Exploratory activity; Learning; Personality; Social insects

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27688007     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  12 in total

1.  Mechanisms of recognition in birds and social Hymenoptera: from detection to information processing.

Authors:  Natacha Rossi; Sébastien Derégnaucourt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  More exploratory house mice judge an ambiguous situation more negatively.

Authors:  Aurélie Verjat; Paul Devienne; Heiko G Rödel; Christophe Féron
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Heritabilities and co-variation among cognitive traits in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Enrico Sorato; Josefina Zidar; Laura Garnham; Alastair Wilson; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Do Insects Have Emotions? Some Insights from Bumble Bees.

Authors:  David Baracchi; Mathieu Lihoreau; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Judgement bias in pigs is independent of performance in a spatial holeboard task and conditional discrimination learning.

Authors:  Sanne Roelofs; Eimear Murphy; Haifang Ni; Elise Gieling; Rebecca E Nordquist; F Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Valence of Facial Cues Influences Sheep Learning in a Visual Discrimination Task.

Authors:  Lucille G A Bellegarde; Hans W Erhard; Alexander Weiss; Alain Boissy; Marie J Haskell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-11-06

7.  Automated tracking and analysis of ant trajectories shows variation in forager exploration.

Authors:  Natalie Imirzian; Yizhe Zhang; Christoph Kurze; Raquel G Loreto; Danny Z Chen; David P Hughes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A small number of workers with specific personality traits perform tool use in ants.

Authors:  István Maák; Garyk Roelandt; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Affect-Driven Attention Biases as Animal Welfare Indicators: Review and Methods.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Gareth Arnott; Emily J Bethell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Measuring affect-related cognitive bias: Do mice in opposite affective states react differently to negative and positive stimuli?

Authors:  Anna C Trevarthen; Sarah Kappel; Claire Roberts; Emily M Finnegan; Elizabeth S Paul; Isaac Planas-Sitjà; Michael T Mendl; Carole Fureix
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.