Literature DB >> 15196803

Individual coping characteristics, rearing conditions and behavioural flexibility in pigs.

J Elizabeth Bolhuis1, Willem G P Schouten, John A de Leeuw, Johan W Schrama, Victor M Wiegant.   

Abstract

Several studies suggest that classification of piglets early in life based on the degree of resistance they display in a so-called Backtest may be indicative of their coping style at a later age. In the present study behavioural flexibility was investigated in pigs diverging for Backtest response and housing environment during rearing. Pigs were housed either without a rooting substrate (barren housing, B) or in identical pens enriched with deep straw bedding (enriched housing, E) from birth. During the suckling period piglets were subjected to the Backtest. Each piglet was restrained on its back for 1 min and the resistance (i.e. number of escape attempts) was scored. Pigs classified as 'high-resisting' (HR) or as 'low-resisting' (LR) were subjected to a simple (left/right) spatial discrimination (T-maze) task at 8 weeks of age. The effect of a single, subtle intramaze change was determined after acquisition of the task. In addition, pigs were subjected to reversal learning to assess their ability to modulate established behaviour patterns. Housing and its interaction with Backtest classification influenced the behavioural response to the intramaze change: E pigs were considerably more distracted than B pigs. Housing condition affected LR pigs more than HR pigs, as indicated by the interaction effects on various recorded behaviours. These interactions indicate that behavioural responding of pigs with diverging coping characteristics cannot simply be generalised across rearing conditions. Furthermore, HR pigs were less successful in reversal learning than LR pigs, suggesting that they have a higher propensity to develop inflexible behavioural routines. Copyright 2003 Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15196803     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  53 in total

Review 1.  Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: towards underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Caroline M Coppens; Sietse F de Boer; Jaap M Koolhaas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Feeding motivation as a personality trait in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): role of serotonergic neurotransmission.

Authors:  Patricia I M Silva; Catarina I M Martins; Erik Höglund; Hans Magnus Gjøen; Øyvind Øverli
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.794

3.  Neurobehavioral functional deficits following closed head injury in the neonatal pig.

Authors:  Stuart H Friess; Rebecca N Ichord; Kristin Owens; Jill Ralston; Rebecca Rizol; Karen L Overall; Colin Smith; Mark A Helfaer; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Relationship between individual and group learning in a marine teleost: A case study with sea bass under self-feeding conditions.

Authors:  David Benhaïm; Sébastien Ferrari; Tatiana Colchen; Béatrice Chatain; Marie-Laure Bégout
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective.

Authors:  Andrew Sih; Marco Del Giudice
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Animal models of restricted repetitive behavior in autism.

Authors:  Mark H Lewis; Yoko Tanimura; Linda W Lee; James W Bodfish
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  More exploratory house mice judge an ambiguous situation more negatively.

Authors:  Aurélie Verjat; Paul Devienne; Heiko G Rödel; Christophe Féron
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Testing the predictions of coping styles theory in threespined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Miles K Bensky; Ryan Paitz; Laura Pereira; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Repeated traumatic brain injury affects composite cognitive function in piglets.

Authors:  Stuart H Friess; Rebecca N Ichord; Jill Ralston; Karen Ryall; Mark A Helfaer; Colin Smith; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.