Kate E Humphrey1, Maria Mirica2, Shobha Phansalkar3, Al Ozonoff4,5, Marvin B Harper6. 1. Patient Safety and Quality, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 2. General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 3. Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 4. Precision Vaccines Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 6. Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Alert presentation of clinical decision support recommendations is a common method for providing information; however, many alerts are overridden suggesting presentation design improvements can be made. This study attempts to assess pediatric prescriber information needs for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) alerts and to evaluate the optimal presentation timing and presentation in the medication ordering process. METHODS: Six case scenarios presented interactions between medications used in pediatric specialties of general medicine, infectious disease, cardiology, and neurology. Timing varied to include alert interruption at medication selection versus order submission; or was noninterruptive. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and independently analyzed to derive central themes. RESULTS: Fourteen trainee and attending clinicians trained in pediatrics, cardiology, and neurology participated. Coders derived 8 central themes from 929 quotes. Discordance exists between medication prescribing frequency and DDI knowledge; providers may commonly prescribe medications for which they do not recognize DDIs. Providers wanted alerts at medication selection rather than at order signature. Alert presentation themes included standardizing text, providing interaction-specific incidence/risk information, DDI rating scales, consolidating alerts, and providing alternative therapies. Providers want alerts to be actionable, for example, allowing medication discontinuation and color visual cues for essential information. Despite alert volume, participants did not "mind being reminded because there is always the chance that at that particular moment (they) do not remember it" and acknowledged the importance of alerts as "essential in terms of patient safety." CONCLUSION: Clinicians unanimously agreed on the importance of receiving DDI alerts to improve patient safety. The perceived alert value can be improved by incorporating clinician preferences for timing and presentation. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
OBJECTIVE: Alert presentation of clinical decision support recommendations is a common method for providing information; however, many alerts are overridden suggesting presentation design improvements can be made. This study attempts to assess pediatric prescriber information needs for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) alerts and to evaluate the optimal presentation timing and presentation in the medication ordering process. METHODS: Six case scenarios presented interactions between medications used in pediatric specialties of general medicine, infectious disease, cardiology, and neurology. Timing varied to include alert interruption at medication selection versus order submission; or was noninterruptive. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and independently analyzed to derive central themes. RESULTS: Fourteen trainee and attending clinicians trained in pediatrics, cardiology, and neurology participated. Coders derived 8 central themes from 929 quotes. Discordance exists between medication prescribing frequency and DDI knowledge; providers may commonly prescribe medications for which they do not recognize DDIs. Providers wanted alerts at medication selection rather than at order signature. Alert presentation themes included standardizing text, providing interaction-specific incidence/risk information, DDI rating scales, consolidating alerts, and providing alternative therapies. Providers want alerts to be actionable, for example, allowing medication discontinuation and color visual cues for essential information. Despite alert volume, participants did not "mind being reminded because there is always the chance that at that particular moment (they) do not remember it" and acknowledged the importance of alerts as "essential in terms of patient safety." CONCLUSION: Clinicians unanimously agreed on the importance of receiving DDI alerts to improve patient safety. The perceived alert value can be improved by incorporating clinician preferences for timing and presentation. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Authors: Anne Miller; Brian Moon; Shilo Anders; Rachel Walden; Steven Brown; Diane Montella Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Hanna M Seidling; Ulrike Klein; Matthias Schaier; David Czock; Dirk Theile; Markus G Pruszydlo; Jens Kaltschmidt; Gerd Mikus; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Yu Ko; Daniel C Malone; Grant H Skrepnek; Edward P Armstrong; John E Murphy; Jacob Abarca; Rick A Rehfeld; Sally J Reel; Raymond L Woosley Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2008 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Eric S Kirkendall; Michal Kouril; Judith W Dexheimer; Joshua D Courter; Philip Hagedorn; Rhonda Szczesniak; Dan Li; Rahul Damania; Thomas Minich; S Andrew Spooner Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Steven Stettner; Sarah Adie; Sarah Hanigan; Michael Thomas; Kristen Pogue; Christopher Zimmerman Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Michael P Friebe; Joseph R LeGrand; Bryan E Shepherd; Elizabeth A Breeden; Scott D Nelson Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Katy E Trinkley; Jonathan M Pell; Dario D Martinez; Nicola R Maude; Gary Hale; Michael A Rosenberg Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 2.342