Eric S Kirkendall1,2,3,4, Michal Kouril1, Judith W Dexheimer1,5, Joshua D Courter6, Philip Hagedorn2,3, Rhonda Szczesniak7,8, Dan Li9, Rahul Damania10, Thomas Minich2,6, S Andrew Spooner1,2,3. 1. Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Information Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 3. Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 4. James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 5. Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 6. Division of Pharmacy, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 7. Division of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 8. Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 9. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 10. Northeast Ohio Medical University College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Electronic trigger detection tools hold promise to reduce Adverse drug event (ADEs) through efficiencies of scale and real-time reporting. We hypothesized that such a tool could automatically detect medication dosing errors as well as manage and evaluate dosing rule modifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created an order and alert analysis system that identified antibiotic medication orders and evaluated user response to dosing alerts. Orders associated with overridden alerts were examined for evidence of administration and the delivered dose was compared to pharmacy-derived dosing rules to confirm true overdoses. True overdose cases were reviewed for association with known ADEs. RESULTS: Of 55 546 orders reviewed, 539 were true overdose orders, which lead to 1965 known overdose administrations. Documentation of loose stools and diarrhea was significantly increased following drug administration in the overdose group. Dosing rule thresholds were altered to reflect clinically accurate dosing. These rule changes decreased overall alert burden and improved the salience of alerts. DISCUSSION: Electronic algorithm-based detection systems can identify antibiotic overdoses that are clinically relevant and are associated with known ADEs. The system also serves as a platform for evaluating the effects of modifying electronic dosing rules. These modifications lead to decreased alert burden and improvements in response to decision support alerts. CONCLUSION: The success of this test case suggests that gains are possible in reducing medication errors and improving patient safety with automated algorithm-based detection systems. Follow-up studies will determine if the positive effects of the system persist and if these changes lead to improved safety outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Electronic trigger detection tools hold promise to reduce Adverse drug event (ADEs) through efficiencies of scale and real-time reporting. We hypothesized that such a tool could automatically detect medication dosing errors as well as manage and evaluate dosing rule modifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created an order and alert analysis system that identified antibiotic medication orders and evaluated user response to dosing alerts. Orders associated with overridden alerts were examined for evidence of administration and the delivered dose was compared to pharmacy-derived dosing rules to confirm true overdoses. True overdose cases were reviewed for association with known ADEs. RESULTS: Of 55 546 orders reviewed, 539 were true overdose orders, which lead to 1965 known overdose administrations. Documentation of loose stools and diarrhea was significantly increased following drug administration in the overdose group. Dosing rule thresholds were altered to reflect clinically accurate dosing. These rule changes decreased overall alert burden and improved the salience of alerts. DISCUSSION: Electronic algorithm-based detection systems can identify antibiotic overdoses that are clinically relevant and are associated with known ADEs. The system also serves as a platform for evaluating the effects of modifying electronic dosing rules. These modifications lead to decreased alert burden and improvements in response to decision support alerts. CONCLUSION: The success of this test case suggests that gains are possible in reducing medication errors and improving patient safety with automated algorithm-based detection systems. Follow-up studies will determine if the positive effects of the system persist and if these changes lead to improved safety outcomes.
Keywords:
CPOE; adverse drug event; clinical; decision support systems; electronic health record; electronic medical record; medical order entry system; patient safety; risk management
Authors: Thomas Isaac; Joel S Weissman; Roger B Davis; Michael Massagli; Adrienne Cyrulik; Daniel Z Sands; Saul N Weingart Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-02-09
Authors: D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: D W Bates; N Spell; D J Cullen; E Burdick; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; B J Sweitzer; L L Leape Journal: JAMA Date: 1997 Jan 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mark T Holdsworth; Richard E Fichtl; Maryam Behta; Dennis W Raisch; Elena Mendez-Rico; Alexa Adams; Melanie Greifer; Susan Bostwick; Bruce M Greenwald Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2003-01
Authors: Yizhao Ni; Todd Lingren; Eric S Hall; Matthew Leonard; Kristin Melton; Eric S Kirkendall Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497