| Literature DB >> 32695229 |
Roland Gal1,2, Dora Praksch1,2, Peter Kenyeres1,2, Miklos Rabai1,2, Kalman Toth1,2, Robert Halmosi1,2, Tamas Habon1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Several beneficial effects of resveratrol have already been published. This study evaluated the effect of resveratrol on the hemorheological parameters in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32695229 PMCID: PMC7350166 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7262474
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ther ISSN: 1755-5914 Impact factor: 3.023
Figure 1Study design.
Baseline characteristics of the study population according to the treatment arms.
| Resveratrol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 65.8 ± 1.9 | 67.5 ± 2.1 |
| Male | 22 (73%) | 21 (70%) |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 30.06 ± 1.04 | 31.70 ± 1.27 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | 2998 ± 507 | 3139 ± 446 |
| Serum creatinine ( | 99.77 ± 4.42 | 104.47 ± 4.82 |
| Sys. BP (mmHg) | 132.47 ± 3.4 | 128.77 ± 3.8 |
| Dias. BP (mmHg) | 79.1 ± 2.33 | 80.13 ± 2.66 |
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 72.2 ± 2.75 | 76.93 ± 2.5 |
|
| ||
| Ischemic heart disease | 17 (56.7%) | 17 (56.7%) |
| Nonischemic (alcohol, chemotherapy, and myocarditis) | 13 (43.3%) | 13 (43.3%) |
|
| ||
| Hypertension | 22 (73%) | 23 (76%) |
| Diabetes | 13 (43%) | 14 (46%) |
| Smoking | 11 (36%) | 8 (27%) |
| Pulmonary diseases (asthma, COPD) | 7 (23%) | 8 (27%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.3 ± 0.9 | 30.4 ± 1.3 |
| Target heart rate (>70/min) | 23 (76.7%) | 20 (66.7%) |
| Atrial fibrillation | 7 (23%) | 10 (33.3%) |
|
| ||
| ACE inhibitor/ARB | 28 (93%) | 29 (97%) |
| Beta-blocker | 29 (97%) | 28 (93%) |
| MRA | 23 (76.7%) | 21 (70%) |
| Ivabradine | 6 (20%) | 6 (20%) |
|
| ||
| Loop diuretics (furosemide, etacrynic acid) | 27 (90%) | 28 (93%) |
| Thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics (hypothiazide, indapamide, etc.) | 8 (27%) | 9 (30%) |
|
| ||
| CRT-P/D | 9 (30%) | 7 (23.2%) |
| ICD | 4 (13%) | 3 (10%) |
Baseline characteristics of the study population according to the treatment arms. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. There were no significant differences in characteristics between RES- (resveratrol-) and placebo-treated groups at baseline. ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI: body mass index; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRT-P/D: cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker/defibrillator; Dias. BP: diastolic blood pressure; ICD: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; MRA: mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NT-proBNP: N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; Sys. BP: systolic blood pressure.
Effect of resveratrol on hemorheological parameters.
| Baseline | 3rd month | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Resveratrol | Placebo | Resveratrol | Placebo | |
| Hematocrit (%) | 43.35 ± 0.63 | 45.03 ± 0.98 | 44.93 ± 0.98 | 44.76 ± 0.93 | 44.10 ± 1.02 |
| WBV (mPas) | 4.04 ± 0.07 | 4.59 ± 0.13# | 4.55 ± 0.14# | 4.45 ± 0.13 | 4.42 ± 0.13 |
| PV (mPas) | 1.28 ± 0.02 | 1.34 ± 0.02 | 1.31 ± 0.02 | 1.32 ± 0.02 | 1.32 ± 0.02 |
|
| |||||
|
| 5.91 ± 0.25 | 6.02 ± 0.36 | 6.38 ± 0.28 | 5.90 ± 0.31 | 6.36 ± 0.28 |
|
| 13.77 ± 0.78 | 13.96 ± 0.42 | 14.14 ± .0.47 | 13.46 ± 0.40∗ | 13.84 ± 0.51 |
|
| |||||
| AI | 69.37 ± 1.1 | 73.36 ± 1.02# | 72.08 ± 1.04# | 70.55 ± 0.99∗ | 70.15 ± 1.14 |
|
| 1.57 ± 0.11 | 1.23 ± 0.08# | 1.34 ± 0.09# | 1.45 ± 0.08∗ | 1.51 ± 0.11 |
|
| 112.75 ± 4.43 | 161.92 ± 11.02# | 160.39 ± 12.54# | 133.70 ± 7.25∗ | 138.60 ± 9.12 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. #Significant difference in the resveratrol or placebo groups compared to the control group at baseline; ∗significant difference in 3rd month values of the resveratrol group compared to the baseline values of the resveratrol group (p < 0.05). Baseline: measured values at randomization in the resveratrol group or in the placebo group; 3rd month: patients treated with resveratrol or placebo for 3 months; AI: aggregation index; t1/2 (s): aggregation half time; M and M1 values: aggregation indices at different rotation speeds of the aggregometer; PV: plasma viscosity; RBC: red blood cell; WBV: whole blood viscosity; γ (1/s): threshold shear rate.
Figure 2Effect of resveratrol on red blood cell aggregation. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Star (∗) = significant difference in 3rd month values of the resveratrol group compared to the baseline values of the resveratrol group (p < 0.05). Baseline: measured values at randomization in the resveratrol or placebo group; 3rd month: patients treated with resveratrol or placebo for 3 months; M1 value: aggregation index at 3 s−1 rotation speed of the Myrenne aggregometer; AI: aggregation index measured by LORCA aggregometer; t1/2 (s): aggregation half time; γ (1/s): threshold shear rate.
Effect of resveratrol on red blood cell deformability.
| Baseline | 3rd month | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resveratrol (EI) | Placebo (EI) | Resveratrol (EI) | Placebo (EI) | |
| Shear stress | ||||
| 30 (Pa) | 0.619 ± 0.003 | 0.623 ± 0.001 | 0.621 ± 0.002 | 0.623 ± 0.001 |
| 3 (Pa) | 0.415 ± 0.004 | 0.420 ± 0.003 | 0.414 ± 0.004 | 0.422 ± 0.003 |
| 0.3 (Pa) | 0.008 ± 0.009 | 0.009 ± 0.006 | 0.005 ± 0.007 | 0.009 ± 0.006 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. There was no difference in the EI values at any shear stresses between the placebo, resveratrol baseline, and 3rd month groups. Baseline: measured values at randomization in the resveratrol or placebo group; 3rd month: patients treated with resveratrol or placebo for 3 months. EI: elongation index; Pa: pascal.