| Literature DB >> 32689945 |
Xuebin Tian1,2, Qiongdan Wang1, Laura Perlaza-Jiménez3, Xiangkuo Zheng2, Yajie Zhao2, Vijay Dhanasekaran3, Renchi Fang1, Jiahui Li1, Chong Wang1, Haiyang Liu1, Trevor Lithgow4, Jianming Cao5, Tieli Zhou6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a looming threat to human health. Although there are numerous studies regarding porin alteration in association with the production of ESBLs and/or AmpC β-lactamase, a systematic study on the treatment-emergence of porins alteration in antibiotic resistance does not yet exist. The aim of this study was to investigate the underlying mechanism of resistance of K. pneumoniae during carbapenem treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; Carbapenem resistance; Imipenem treatment; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Outer membrane porin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32689945 PMCID: PMC7372807 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-01898-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Phenotypic detection, distribution of resistance genes, MICs and virulence factors of antimicrobial agents among the K. pneumoniae isolates
| Isolates | MHT1 | EDTA | Resistance genes profiles | MIC (μg/ml) | Relative expression of | Virulence factors | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRO | CAZ | CTX | IPM | MEM | ETP | LEV | CIP | TOB | GEN | AMK | FOS | COL | TGC | |||||||
| – | – | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 256 | 0.25 | 2 | 0.93 | 12.67 | K57, | ||
| – | – | 8 | > 64 | 16 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 8 | 4 | 128 | 32 | 4 | > 1024 | 1 | 1 | 1.61 | 1.39 | K57, | ||
| – | – | 8 | > 64 | 64 | 8 | 1 | > 16 | 8 | 4 | 128 | 64 | 16 | > 1024 | 1 | 1 | 1.44 | 0.093 | K57, | ||
Note:1)MHT Modified Hodge test, EDTA EDTA synergy test
2)CRO Ceftriaxone, CAZ Ceftazidime, CTX Cefotaxime, IPM Imipenem, MEM Meropenem, ETP Ertapenem, LEV Levofloxacin, CIP Ciprofloxacin, TOB Tobramycin, GEN Gentamicin, AMK Amikacin, FOS Fosfomycin, COL Colistin, TGC Tigecycline
Fig. 1Treatment and diagnostic timeline. Timeline representing the days at which the isolates were obtained from patient and the respective interventions that were performed
Fig. 2PFGE analysis and MLST of 3 K. pneumoniae isolates. a Relatedness was analyzed using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). The phylogenetic tree was generated using UPGMA clustering. A genetic similarity index scale is indicated by the vertical line. b Phylogeny of the three isolates and two other ST660 genomes from NCBI. Labels in the nodes are bootstrap support. The scale represents the number of substitutions per site. c MAUVE alignment of the three genome sequence datasets. SNPs are represented by vertical red lines, colored boxes at the far end of the alignment correspond to putative plasmids acquired or lost from each of the subsequent isolated strains
Fig. 3OMP analysis from the K. pneumoniae strains. Extracts prepared from the three isolates (FK-2624, FK-2723 and FK-2820) and the control K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883 were subject to SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie blue. Lanes M, protein mass marker. ATCC 13883, an isolate with known expression of both OmpK35 and OmpK36
Primers used in this study to amplify porin genes and RT-PCR
| AAGACTACTGGTGGTTATCGCGACCT | |
| CGACAAAAAGCGCGAAGGTTT | |
| GTCGAAGCGGCAACCGATTATG | |
| GCTTCGGCTTTGTCGCCATT | |
| CCGGTTGAAATAGGGGTAAACAGAC | |
| CCATTAATCGAGGCTCCTCTTACCA | |
| GAGTTGCGTTGTAGGTCTGG | |
| GGCGACACCTACGGTTCTGACAA | |
| GTCTGGACCACCAATGGC | |
| GATCTGAGTTTCGCCTTTCA | |
| GACCAGACCTACATGCGTGTA | |
| GTATTCCCACTGGCCGTAAC | |
Note:F Forward (5′) primer. R Reverse primer