| Literature DB >> 32685379 |
Pichatorn Suppakitjanusant1, Yuhan Ji2, Mary O Stevenson3, Panicha Chantrapanichkul4, R Craig Sineath5,6, Michael Goodman6, Jessica A Alvarez3, Vin Tangpricha3,7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many transgender people take hormone therapy to affirm their gender identity. One potential long-term consequence of gender affirming hormone therapy is increased body mass index (BMI), which may be associated with metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease and higher mortality. Only a few published studies explored changes in BMI in transgender people taking gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT).Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index; Gender affirming hormone therapy; Transgender
Year: 2020 PMID: 32685379 PMCID: PMC7358708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcte.2020.100230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Transl Endocrinol ISSN: 2214-6237
Fig. 1Flow diagram of study participants.
Baseline characteristics of transgender women and transgender men who underwent gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT).
| Transgender women | Transgender men | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Already on GAHT (n = 46) | Hormone naïve (n = 59) | Already on GAHT (n = 15) | Hormone naïve (n = 25) | |
| 43.9 ± 15.6 | 32.8 ± 11.7* | 40.4 ± 13.1 | 27.4 ± 8.8†* | |
| Caucasian | 52.1% | 71.2% | 66.7% | 68.0% |
| African American | 23.9% | 8.5% | 6.7% | 12.0% |
| Asian | 4.4% | 1.7% | 6.7% | 0% |
| Multiple | 0% | 1.7% | 6.7% | 4.0% |
| Unknown | 19.6% | 16.9% | 13.2% | 16.0% |
| 26.3 ± 4.7 | 24.7 ± 4.7 | 26.6 ± 4.2 | 24.4 ± 5.4 | |
| 69.7 ± 3.6 | 69.5 ± 2.4 | 64.6 ± 3.1† | 65.4 ± 3.1† | |
| 182.6 ± 41.8 | 169.1 ± 34.6 | 158.6 ± 30.5† | 147.7 ± 34.5† | |
| 6.6 ± 9.35 | 0 | 3.7 ± 3.43† | 0 | |
Values are given as mean ± SD of the 46 transgender women who entered the cohort already on GAHT compared with 59 transgender women who entered the cohort before the initiation of GAHT and the 15 transgender men who entered the cohort already on GAHT and 25 transgender men who entered the cohort before the initiation of GAHT are in both comparisons. BMI, body mass index *P < 0.05 (p-values represent significance from log-transformed variables when relevant). We also compare transgender women to transgender men who already on hormone and transgender women to transgender men who hormone naïve. †P < 0.05 (p-values represent significance from log-transformed variables when relevant).
Fig. 2Boxplots for course of BMI levels in four cohorts of transgender men and women receiving gender affirming hormone therapy over the period of 7 years. A: transgender women who entered the cohort after on GAHT for more than 6 months (P-value = 0.064). B: transgender women who entered the cohort prior to starting GAHT (P-value = 0.004). C: transgender men who entered the cohort after on GAHT for more than 6 months (P-value = 0.739). D: transgender men who entered the cohort prior to starting GAHT (P-value = 0.790).
Association of BMI in four cohorts of transgender men and women receiving gender affirming hormone therapy with age and duration of taking gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) using linear mixed model.
| Model 1: Transgender women who entered the cohort after on GAHT for more than 6 months (N = 46) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Effects | Estimate | 95%CI | P-value |
| Intercept | 18.66 | [14.91, 22.41] | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | 0.17 | [0.08, 0.25] | <0.001 |
| GAHT duration (quarters) | 0.08 | [−0.004, 0.16] | 0.064 |
P-value represent significance from log-transformed variables when relevant.