BACKGROUND: Adverse levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are related to skinfold thicknesses and body mass index (BMI) among children, but the relative strengths of these associations are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine whether the sum of the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses (SF sum) is more strongly related to levels of 6 risk factors (triglycerides, LDL and HDL cholesterol, insulin, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure) than is BMI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of schoolchildren examined in the Bogalusa Heart Study from 1981 to 1994 (n = 6866) were conducted. A risk factor summary index was derived by using principal components analysis. RESULTS: After race, sex, study period, and age were controlled for, almost all comparisons indicated that BMI was more strongly related to risk factor levels than was the SF sum. Although the differences were generally small, many were statistically significant. Associations with the risk factor summary, for example, were r = 0.50 for BMI and r = 0.47 for SF sum (P < 0.001 for difference). Furthermore, an adverse risk factor summary was observed among 62% of the children with the highest (upper 5%) BMI levels but among only 54% of children with the highest SF sum levels. CONCLUSIONS: BMI is at least as accurate as SF sum in identifying children and adolescents who are at metabolic risk. Because of the training and errors associated with skinfold-thickness measurements, the advantages of BMI should be considered in the design and interpretation of clinical and epidemiologic studies.
BACKGROUND: Adverse levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are related to skinfold thicknesses and body mass index (BMI) among children, but the relative strengths of these associations are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine whether the sum of the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses (SF sum) is more strongly related to levels of 6 risk factors (triglycerides, LDL and HDL cholesterol, insulin, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure) than is BMI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of schoolchildren examined in the Bogalusa Heart Study from 1981 to 1994 (n = 6866) were conducted. A risk factor summary index was derived by using principal components analysis. RESULTS: After race, sex, study period, and age were controlled for, almost all comparisons indicated that BMI was more strongly related to risk factor levels than was the SF sum. Although the differences were generally small, many were statistically significant. Associations with the risk factor summary, for example, were r = 0.50 for BMI and r = 0.47 for SF sum (P < 0.001 for difference). Furthermore, an adverse risk factor summary was observed among 62% of the children with the highest (upper 5%) BMI levels but among only 54% of children with the highest SF sum levels. CONCLUSIONS: BMI is at least as accurate as SF sum in identifying children and adolescents who are at metabolic risk. Because of the training and errors associated with skinfold-thickness measurements, the advantages of BMI should be considered in the design and interpretation of clinical and epidemiologic studies.
Authors: S Tanaka; K Togashi; T Rankinen; L Pérusse; A S Leon; D C Rao; J S Skinner; J H Wilmore; C Bouchard Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 2002-02
Authors: R S Lindsay; R L Hanson; J Roumain; E Ravussin; W C Knowler; P A Tataranni Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: D S Freedman; J Wang; L M Maynard; J C Thornton; Z Mei; R N Pierson; W H Dietz; M Horlick Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Kate P Kerruish; Janice O'Connor; Ian R J Humphries; Michael R Kohn; Simon D Clarke; Julie N Briody; Emma J Thomson; Katharine A Wright; Kevin J Gaskin; Louise A Baur Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: David S Freedman; Alyson Goodman; Omar A Contreras; Pronabesh DasMahapatra; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Gerald S Berenson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jennifer Weiss; Elizabeth Matzkin; Michael Flippin; Mark Pallis; Mark Rankin Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.176