| Literature DB >> 32681599 |
Lorena I Rangel1, Rebecca E Spanner1,2, Malaika K Ebert1,2, Sarah J Pethybridge3, Eva H Stukenbrock4,5, Ronnie de Jonge6, Gary A Secor2, Melvin D Bolton1,2.
Abstract
Cercospora leaf spot, caused by the fungal pathogen Cercospora beticola, is the most destructive foliar disease of sugar beet worldwide. This review discusses C. beticola genetics, genomics, and biology and summarizes our current understanding of the molecular interactions that occur between C. beticola and its sugar beet host. We highlight the known virulence arsenal of C. beticola as well as its ability to overcome currently used disease management strategies. Finally, we discuss future prospects for the study and management of C. beticola infections in the context of newly employed molecular tools to uncover additional information regarding the biology of this pathogen. TAXONOMY: Cercospora beticola Sacc.; Kingdom Fungi, Phylum Ascomycota, Class Dothideomycetes, Order Capnodiales, Family Mycosphaerellaceae, Genus Cercospora. HOST RANGE: Well-known pathogen of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris) and most species of the Beta genus. Reported as pathogenic on other members of the Chenopodiaceae (e.g., lamb's quarters, spinach) as well as members of the Acanthaceae (e.g., bear's breeches), Apiaceae (e.g., Apium), Asteraceae (e.g., chrysanthemum, lettuce, safflower), Brassicaceae (e.g., wild mustard), Malvaceae (e.g., Malva), Plumbaginaceae (e.g., Limonium), and Polygonaceae (e.g., broad-leaved dock) families. DISEASE SYMPTOMS: Leaves infected with C. beticola exhibit circular lesions that are coloured tan to grey in the centre and are often delimited by tan-brown to reddish-purple rings. As disease progresses, spots can coalesce to form larger necrotic areas, causing severely infected leaves to wither and die. At the centre of these spots are black spore-bearing structures (pseudostromata). Older leaves often show symptoms first and younger leaves become infected as the disease progresses. MANAGEMENT: Application of a mixture of fungicides with different modes of action is currently performed although elevated resistance has been documented in most employed fungicide classes. Breeding for high-yielding cultivars with improved host resistance is an ongoing effort and prudent cultural practices, such as crop rotation, weed host management, and cultivation to reduce infested residue levels, are widely used to manage disease. USEFUL WEBSITE: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/11237?genome_assembly_id=352037.Entities:
Keywords: cercosporin; effector; fungicide resistance; secondary metabolite
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32681599 PMCID: PMC7368123 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Plant Pathol ISSN: 1364-3703 Impact factor: 5.663
Figure 1Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) of sugar beet. (a) Drone image highlighting the importance of fungicides for disease management. While the disease was well‐managed on the right side of the field, an abrupt halt in fungicide application ultimately resulted in increased CLS disease as evidenced by the brown colour noted on the left side of the field. (b) Extensive CLS disease in a sugar beet field. (c) Disease cycle of Cercospora beticola on sugar beet. Infection is initiated by airborne or splash‐dispersed conidia that penetrate the sugar beet leaf through stomata and give rise to intercellular hyphal growth. Leaf spots form on the leaves after the switch to necrotrophy, which typically occurs 7 days after infection. Pseudostromata develop in these lesions and asexually produce spores, leading to multiple infection cycles during the growing season. The pseudostromata are also the overwintering structures on plant debris at the end of the season. It is possible that C. beticola can sexually reproduce and produce ascospores, in a similar way to Zymoseptoria tritici, but this stage has not been observed. Extensive CLS disease in a sugar beet field. (d) Scanning electron micrograph exhibiting C. beticola conidiophores emerging from sugar beet. (e) CLS symptomology on sugar beet
Cercospora beticola genome statistics and comparison to other related fungi
| Species | Cbe | Cbr | Ccn | Dse | Ztr | Lma | Ptr | Pno | Ani |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Total assembly length (Mb) | 37.1 | 37.4 | 34.0 | 30.2 | 39.7 | 44.9 | 37.8 | 37.2 | 30.5 |
| Total length of gaps (Mb) | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| No. of scaffolds/contigs | 248 | 28,905 | 6,126 | 20 | 21 | 41 | 47 | 108 | 8 |
| NG50 scaffolds (no.) | 4 | 111 | 422 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
| LG50 scaffolds (Mbp) | 4.17 | 0.096 | 0.023 | 2.60 | 2.67 | 1.77 | 1.99 | 1.05 | 3.76 |
| NG95 scaffolds (no.) | 10 | 11,497 | 2,320 | 12 | 18 | 25 | 20 | 43 | 8 |
| GC content (%) | |||||||||
| Overall (excl. gaps) | 52.2 | 51.5 | 52.6 | 53.1 | 52.1 | 45.2 | 51.0 | 50.4 | 50.4 |
| Coding (CDS) | 53.8 | 53.9 | 54.3 | 54.6 | 55.6 | 54.1 | 53.6 | 54.6 | 53.4 |
| Repeat content (Mb) | 0.51 | ND | ND | 1.08 | 6.98 | 15.93 | 0.80 | 2.88 | 1.07 |
|
| |||||||||
| Protein‐coding genes (no.) | 12,281 | 11,972 | 11,556 | 12,580 | 10,951 | 12,469 | 12,169 | 12,380 | 10,680 |
| Mean gene length (bp) | 1,885 | 1,584 | 1,556 | 1,896 | 1,602 | 1,446 | 1,616 | 1,468 | 1,736 |
| Percentage coding | 68.4 | 51.1 | 52.9 | 79.3 | 44.2 | 41.2 | 52.9 | 49.1 | 62.2 |
| Mean gene density (no. genes/100 kb | 36.3 | 32.3 | 34.0 | 41.8 | 27.6 | 28.5 | 32.7 | 33.4 | 35.8 |
| Mean CDS length (bp) | 1,469 | 1,473 | 1,450 | 1,223 | 1,310 | 1,258 | 1,349 | 1,271 | 1,456 |
| Exons | |||||||||
| No. of exons | 28,100 | 28,046 | 26,848 | 28,937 | 28,611 | 35,201 | 32,716 | 32,994 | 34,743 |
| Exons/gene | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 3.3 |
| Mean exon length (bp) | 780 | 629 | 624 | 773 | 532 | 446 | 530 | 495 | 477 |
| Introns | |||||||||
| Introns (no. introns) | 15,819 | 16,074 | 15,292 | 16,356 | 17,660 | 22,732 | 20,547 | 20,614 | 24,062 |
| Introns/gene | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| Mean intron length (bp) | 73 | 83 | 80 | 91 | 133 | 103 | 114 | 90 | 82 |
ND, not determined (ND).
Genomes are Cercospora beticola (Cbe), Cercospora berteroae (Cbr), Cercospora canescens (Ccn), Dothistroma septosporum (Dse), Zymoseptoria tritici (Ztr), Leptosphaeria maculans (Lma), Pyrenophora tritici‐repentis (Ptr), Parastagonospora nodorum (Pno), and Aspergillus nidulans (Ani).
Only considering the longest transcript (if alternatives exist).
Figure 2(a) Schematic representation of the 10 largest (pseudo)chromosomes and/or scaffolds of Cercospora beticola, highlighting the density of genes (genes/10 kb; ranging from 0 [white] to 10 [dark red]), the location of candidate effectors (the small, secreted cysteine‐rich proteins or SSCPs; black circles) and the type and location of biosynthetic gene clusters (coloured triangles) for secondary metabolites. (b) Whole‐genome alignment between C. beticola and Dothistroma septosporum highlighting extensive chromosome mesosynteny. Whole‐genome, protein sequence‐based alignments between C. beticola and D. septosporum reveal many short syntenic regions that are spread over each scaffold or chromosome pair, exemplary for mesosynteny. (c) Example of the shuffled homologous regions shared between chromosomes 3 and 2 from C. beticola and D. septosporum, respectively. (a) and (c) prepared using RIdeogram (Hao et al., 2019); (b) prepared by promer in MUMMER3 (Kurtz et al., 2004)
Figure 3(a) Preliminary scheme of the cercosporin biosynthetic pathway consisting of 12 clustered genes. The polyketide synthase CTB1 forms nor‐toralactone, which is processed to cercoquinone C by CTB3 methyltransferase (CTB3‐MT) and monooxygenase (CTB3‐MO). Further processing of this cercosporin intermediate might be mediated by CTB2, CTB6, CTB11, and CTB12 to yield the cercosporin intermediate displayed in the square brackets, which has not been directly observed but is rather logically inferred. CTB5 and CTB7 are hypothesized to prime the cercosporin molecule for methylenedioxy bridge formation by CTB9 and CTB10. (b) Beticolin structures and isoforms. Beticolins are structurally related but can differ by residues (R) and isoforms (ortho‐, epi‐ortho‐, or para‐beticolin). Beticolins that carry the same residues are able to transform into each other by switching isomery. For example, ortho‐beticolin B2 can transform into the epi‐ortho‐beticolin B6 or para‐beticolin B1 based on the position of the oxygen and chlorine atoms
Figure 4Fungicide resistance surveys for Cercospora beticola in the Red River Valley region. (a) Incidence (percentage) of fields sampled annually from 1999 to 2019 with isolates resistant to the organotin fungicide triphenyltin hydroxide at 1 µg/ml. (b) Incidence (percentage) of fields sampled from 1999 to 2019 with resistance to the benzimidazole fungicide thiophanate‐methyl at 5 µg/ml. (c) Average annual resistance factor values to the demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicide tetraconazole for isolates sampled annually from 1999 to 2019, where the resistance factor values are the calculated EC50 values divided by the baseline sensitivity values. (d) Incidence (percentage) of sampled isolates annually from 2012 to 2019 harbouring the G143A mutation in cytochrome b, conferring resistance to the quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicide pyraclostrobin