Literature DB >> 32676805

Deploying attention to the target location of a pointing action modulates audiovisual processes at nontarget locations.

Tristan Loria1,2, Kanji Tanaka2,3, Katsumi Watanabe1,2,4, Luc Tremblay5.   

Abstract

The current study examined how the deployment of spatial attention at the onset of a pointing movement influenced audiovisual crossmodal interactions at the target of the pointing action and at nontarget locations. These interactions were quantified by measuring the susceptibility to the fission (i.e., reporting two visual flashes under one flash and two auditory beep pairings) and fusion (i.e., reporting one flash under two flashes and one beep pairing) audiovisual illusions. At movement onset, unimodal, or auditory and visual bimodal stimuli were either presented at the target of the pointing action or in an adjacent, nontarget location. In Experiment 1, perceptual accuracy within the unimodal and bimodal conditions was lower in the nontarget relative to the target condition. The fission illusion was uninfluenced by target condition. However, the fusion illusion was more likely to be reported at the target relative to the nontarget location. In Experiment 2, the stimuli from Experiment 1 were further presented at a location near where the eyes were fixated (i.e., congruent condition), where the hand was aiming (i.e., target), or in a location where neither the eyes were fixated nor the hand was aiming. The results yielded the greatest susceptibility to the fusion illusion when the visual location and movement end points were congruent relative to when either movement or fixation was incongruent. Although attention may facilitate the processing of unisensory and multisensory cues in general, attention might have the strongest influence on the audiovisual integration mechanisms that underlie the sound-induced fusion illusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Audition; Multisensory; Pointing; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32676805     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02065-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  23 in total

1.  Reaches to sounds encoded in an eye-centered reference frame.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; R A Andersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: a time-window-of-integration model.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions.

Authors:  Tobias S Andersen; Kaisa Tiippana; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11

5.  Neuromodulation of multisensory perception: a tDCS study of the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Angela Rossetti; Carlotta Casati; Flavia Mancini; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.

Authors:  Hannah B Helbig; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain.

Authors:  Andreea Oliviana Diaconescu; Claude Alain; Anthony Randal McIntosh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Allocation of attention in the visual field.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; Y Y Yeh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality.

Authors:  C J Downing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.