Literature DB >> 3267651

Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison between the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign.

A Mitsou1, P Vallianatos.   

Abstract

A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy between the Lachman test and the anterior drawer test was performed by examining 144 knees with ruptured anterior cruciate ligaments. The diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture is often difficult to establish, especially in recent injuries with acute haemarthrosis. The diagnostic accuracy of the Lachman test in recent ruptures when the patient is examined without general anaesthetic is superior to that of the anterior drawer test, while in chronic cases with third-degree instability the two tests are equally reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3267651     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(88)90139-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  10 in total

Review 1.  The acute swollen knee: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Chinmay Gupte; Jean-Pierre St Mart
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of physical examinations with and without anaesthesia.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Freddie H Fu; Rudolf W Poolman; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Evaluating Different Clinical Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures In Providers with Different Training Backgrounds.

Authors:  Alexander Cm Chong; Chelsea Whitetree; Michael C Priddy; Parker R Zimmerman; Paul R Haeder; Daniel J Prohaska
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

4.  Displaced bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus masking anterior cruciate deficiency.

Authors:  K C Kong; M R Hamlet; T Peckham; M A Mowbray
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Costs and effectiveness of a brief MRI examination of patients with acute knee injury.

Authors:  Edwin H G Oei; Jeroen J Nikken; Abida Z Ginai; Gabriel P Krestin; Jan A N Verhaar; Arie B van Vugt; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Repeatability and accuracy of a non-invasive method of measuring internal and external rotation of the tibia.

Authors:  David F Russell; Angela H Deakin; Quentin A Fogg; Frederic Picard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Factors Associated With High-Grade Lachman, Pivot Shift, and Anterior Drawer at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Timothy E Hewett; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  The diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for anterior cruciate ligament tears are comparable but the Lachman test has been previously overestimated: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pawel A Sokal; Richard Norris; Thomas W Maddox; Rachel A Oldershaw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.114

9.  Value of clinical tests in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhihao Huang; Zhihao Liu; Changfeng Fan; Miao Zou; Jiyan Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Non-invasive, non-radiological quantificationof anteroposterior knee joint ligamentous laxity: A study in cadavers.

Authors:  D F Russell; A H Deakin; Q A Fogg; F Picard
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.