Literature DB >> 18795300

Costs and effectiveness of a brief MRI examination of patients with acute knee injury.

Edwin H G Oei1, Jeroen J Nikken, Abida Z Ginai, Gabriel P Krestin, Jan A N Verhaar, Arie B van Vugt, M G Myriam Hunink.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the costs and effectiveness of selective short magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with acute knee injury. A model was developed to evaluate the selective use of MRI in patients with acute knee injury and no fracture on radiography based on the results of a trial in which 208 patients were randomized between radiography only and radiography plus MRI. We analyzed medical (diagnostic and therapeutic) costs, quality of life, duration of diagnostic workup, number of additional diagnostic examinations, time absent from work, and time to convalescence during a 6-month follow-up period. Quality of life was lowest (EuroQol at 6 weeks 0.61 (95% CI 0.54-0.67)); duration of diagnostic workup, absence from work, and time to convalescence were longest; and the number of diagnostic examinations was largest with radiography only. These outcomes were more favorable for both MRI strategies (EuroQol at 6 weeks 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.77) for both). Mean total costs were 2,593 euros (95% CI 1,815-3,372) with radiography only, 2,116 euros (95% CI 1,488-2,743) with radiography plus MRI, and 1,973 euros (95% CI 1,401-2,543) with selective MRI. The results suggest that selective use of a short MRI examination saves costs and potentially increases effectiveness in patients with acute knee injury without a fracture on radiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18795300     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1162-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

Review 1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a screening procedure to avoid arthroscopy for meniscal tears.

Authors:  J Elvenes; C P Jerome; O Reikerås; O Johansen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Effectiveness of MR imaging in selection of patients for arthroscopy of the knee.

Authors:  Patrice W J Vincken; Bert P M ter Braak; Arian R van Erkell; Theo P W de Rooy; Walter M C Mallens; Wendy Post; Johan L Bloem
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; F F Rutten; B M van Ineveld; L van Roijen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Sleep disturbances in the spinal cord injured: an epidemiological questionnaire investigation, including a normal population.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen; M Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Acute knee trauma: value of a short dedicated extremity MR imaging examination for prediction of subsequent treatment.

Authors:  Edwin H G Oei; Jeroen J Nikken; Abida Z Ginai; Gabriel P Krestin; Jan A N Verhaar; Arie B van Vugt; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Clinical magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in knees: a comparative prospective study of meniscus anterior cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions.

Authors:  B Munk; F Madsen; E Lundorf; H Staunstrup; S A Schmidt; L Bolvig; M B Hellfritzsch; J Jensen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? A randomised trial.

Authors:  M J Campbell; W E Waters
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The study of reproductive outcome and the health of offspring of UK veterans of the Gulf war: methods and description of the study population.

Authors:  Noreen Maconochie; Pat Doyle; Graham Davies; Samantha Lewis; Margo Pelerin; Susan Prior; Patrick Sampson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Musculoskeletal imaging: current and future trends.

Authors:  Hassan Douis; Steven L J James; A Mark Davies
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evidence-based radiology: why and how?

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Myriam G Hunink; Fiona J Gilbert; Giovanni Di Leo; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The role of MRI in musculoskeletal practice: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Gail Dean Deyle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-08

4.  Early magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee injury: a cost analysis.

Authors:  Nirav K Patel; Andrew Bucknill; David Ahearne; Janet Denning; Kailash Desai; Martin Watson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Cost-effectiveness of adding magnetic resonance imaging to rheumatoid arthritis management.

Authors:  Lisa G Suter; Liana Fraenkel; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-11

6.  Outcome of knee injuries in general practice: 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Harry P A Wagemakers; Pim A J Luijsterburg; Edith M Heintjes; Marjolein Y Berger; Jan Verhaar; Bart W Koes; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Traumatic knee injury: correlation of radiographic effusion size with the presence of internal derangement on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nathan D Cecava; Shane Dieckman; Kevin P Banks; Liem T Mansfield
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-05-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.