Literature DB >> 26821957

Factors Associated With High-Grade Lachman, Pivot Shift, and Anterior Drawer at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Robert A Magnussen1, Emily K Reinke2, Laura J Huston2, Timothy E Hewett3, Kurt P Spindler4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine which patient and injury factors are associated with the detection of high-grade laxity on examination under anesthesia before anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
METHODS: We identified 2,318 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction without associated ligament injuries. Demographic data and information regarding meniscal tears were collected. Patients with high-grade Lachman (difference from contralateral side >10 mm), pivot-shift (International Knee Documentation Committee grade 3+), or anterior drawer (difference from contralateral side >10 mm) tests were identified by physical examination under anesthesia before ACL reconstruction. Logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate whether chronicity of the ACL injury, patient age, sex, body mass index, generalized ligamentous laxity, and presence of meniscal tears were associated with increased odds of high-grade laxity, while we controlled for examining surgeon.
RESULTS: Patients with chronic tears (>6 months from injury) had greater than twice the odds of having high-grade Lachman, pivot-shift, and anterior drawer tests (all P < .001) relative to patients with acute tears (<3 months from injury). Generalized ligamentous laxity (odds ratio [OR], 2.33; P < .001) and the presence of medial (OR, 1.63; P < .001) or lateral (OR, 1.41; P = .013) meniscus tears were associated with increased odds of a high-grade Lachman test. Age younger than 20 years (OR, 1.34; P = .023), female sex (OR, 1.49; P = .001), generalized ligamentous laxity (OR, 3.46; P < .001), and the presence of a medial (OR, 1.53; P < .001) or lateral (OR, 1.27; P = .041) meniscus tear were associated with increased odds of a high-grade pivot-shift test. Generalized ligamentous laxity (OR, 2.27; P < .001) and the presence of a medial (OR, 1.73; P = .001) or lateral (OR, 1.50; P = .010) meniscus tear were associated with increased odds of a high-grade anterior drawer test.
CONCLUSIONS: Chronic ACL tears, generalized ligamentous laxity, and meniscus tears are associated with increased odds of high-grade laxity with all 3 tests. Female patients and age younger than 20 years are associated with increased odds of a high-grade pivot-shift test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, lesser-quality prospective study.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26821957      PMCID: PMC4899260          DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  26 in total

1.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The effect of medial versus lateral meniscectomy on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Musa Citak; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Daniel Choi; Asheesh Bedi; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne Benjaminse; Alli Gokeler; Cees P van der Schans
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture.

Authors:  S H Wiertsema; H J A van Hooff; L A A Migchelsen; M P M Steultjens
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Do pre-operative knee laxity values influence post-operative ones after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  C Signorelli; T Bonanzinga; N Lopomo; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; S Bignozzi; G Filardo; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Knee laxity in cruciate ligament injury. Value of examination under anesthesia.

Authors:  L J Dahlstedt; N Dalén
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1989-04

7.  The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries.

Authors:  J W Katz; R J Fingeroth
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Articular mobility in an African population.

Authors:  P Beighton; L Solomon; C L Soskolne
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  The influence of bony morphology on the magnitude of the pivot shift.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Olufemi R Ayeni; Musa Citak; James J Irrgang; Andrew D Pearle; Thomas L Wickiewicz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  [Effect of external extra-articular ligament plasty on the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon, a 4 years follow-up].

Authors:  J L Lerat; A Mandrino; J L Besse; B Moyen; E Brunet-Guedj
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1997
View more
  19 in total

1.  Risk factors for residual pivot shift after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the MAKS group.

Authors:  Hiroko Ueki; Yusuke Nakagawa; Toshiyuki Ohara; Toshifumi Watanabe; Masafumi Horie; Hiroki Katagiri; Koji Otabe; Kenta Katagiri; Kanehiro Hiyama; Mai Katakura; Takashi Hoshino; Kei Inomata; Naoko Araya; Ichiro Sekiya; Takeshi Muneta; Hideyuki Koga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  The Pivot Shift: Current Experimental Methodology and Clinical Utility for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Associated Injury.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vaudreuil; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Darren de Sa; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-03

3.  Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on 6-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Timothy E Hewett; Kurt P Spindler; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Richard D Parker; Armando F Vidal; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Timothy E Hewett; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Triaxial accelerometer evaluation is correlated with IKDC grade of pivot shift.

Authors:  Lionel Helfer; Thais Dutra Vieira; Cesar Praz; Jean Marie Fayard; Mathieu Thaunat; Adnan Saithna; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  CORR Insights®: What Is the Mid-term Failure Rate of Revision ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Romain Seil
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Changes in Cross-sectional Area and Signal Intensity of Healing Anterior Cruciate Ligaments and Grafts in the First 2 Years After Surgery.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Kirsten Ecklund; Martha M Murray; Brett Flutie; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Dennis Kramer; Lyle Micheli; Laura Thurber; Yi-Meng Yen; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates?

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Alexander Zajichek; Emily K Reinke; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Armando F Vidal; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Kevin M Chagin; Michael W Kattan; Emily K Reinke; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Angela D Pedroza; Armando F Vidal; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in chronic ACL injuries leads to better clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Danilo Bordini Camargo; Marcel Faraco Sobrado; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Pedro Nogueira Giglio; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Marco Kawamura Demange
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.