Literature DB >> 32675816

3D-printed bolus improves dose distribution for veterinary patients treated with photon beam radiation therapy.

Tiffany Wormhoudt Martin1, Mary-Keara Boss1, Susan M LaRue1, Del Leary1.   

Abstract

Commercial bolus is frequently used to increase dose at the patient's surface for superficial radiotherapy; however, uneven surfaces can create air gaps and discrepancies between prescribed and delivered dose. The purpose of this study was to determine if a customizable, 3D-printed bolus would improve dosimetry compared with a commercial bolus. For each patient, a planned bolus was generated within planning software, then created with 3D-printing. The treatment plan was recalculated with each bolus in situ. When evaluating tumor volumes at prescription, the 3D-printed bolus was closer to prescription compared to the commercial bolus. There was a significant difference in air gaps in patients receiving radiotherapy to the head (P < 0.001) but the difference was not significant for air gaps in caudal body sites (P = 0.05). Overall, the 3D-printed bolus resulted in reduced air gaps, dosimetry closer to prescription, and should be considered for superficial treatment areas of high irregularity. Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32675816      PMCID: PMC7238465     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  16 in total

1.  The electron beam attenuating properties of SuperFlab, Play-Doh, and wet gauze, compared to plastic water.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Jimmy C Lattimer; Jeffrey S March
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.363

2.  Effect of wetness level on the suitability of wet gauze as a substitute for Superflab as a bolus material for use with 6 mv photons.

Authors:  Jerome Benoit; Amy F Pruitt; Donald E Thrall
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.363

3.  Computed tomography characterisation of additive manufacturing materials.

Authors:  Richard Bibb; Darren Thompson; John Winder
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Efficacy of patient-specific bolus created using three-dimensional printing technique in photon radiotherapy.

Authors:  Koya Fujimoto; Takehiro Shiinoki; Yuki Yuasa; Hideki Hanazawa; Keiko Shibuya
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning.

Authors:  Sua Yoo; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A study on adaptive IMRT treatment planning using kV cone-beam CT.

Authors:  George X Ding; Dennis M Duggan; Charles W Coffey; Matthew Deeley; Dennis E Hallahan; Anthony Cmelak; Arnold Malcolm
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Intrapatient study comparing 3D printed bolus versus standard vinyl gel sheet bolus for postmastectomy chest wall radiation therapy.

Authors:  James L Robar; Kathryn Moran; James Allan; James Clancey; Tami Joseph; Krista Chytyk-Praznik; R Lee MacDonald; John Lincoln; Parisa Sadeghi; Robert Rutledge
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-12-24

8.  Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials.

Authors:  Helena N Chia; Benjamin M Wu
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  A customized bolus produced using a 3-dimensional printer for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Shin-Wook Kim; Hun-Joo Shin; Chul Seung Kay; Seok Hyun Son
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Valeria Filippou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dosimetric Evaluation of Commercially Available Flat vs. Self-Produced 3D-Conformal Silicone Boluses for the Head and Neck Region.

Authors:  Stephan Pollmann; André Toussaint; Michael Flentje; Sonja Wegener; Victor Lewitzki
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.