Literature DB >> 21239209

Computed tomography characterisation of additive manufacturing materials.

Richard Bibb1, Darren Thompson, John Winder.   

Abstract

Additive manufacturing, covering processes frequently referred to as rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing, provides new opportunities in the manufacture of highly complex and custom-fitting medical devices and products. Whilst many medical applications of AM have been explored and physical properties of the resulting parts have been studied, the characterisation of AM materials in computed tomography has not been explored. The aim of this study was to determine the CT number of commonly used AM materials. There are many potential applications of the information resulting from this study in the design and manufacture of wearable medical devices, implants, prostheses and medical imaging test phantoms. A selection of 19 AM material samples were CT scanned and the resultant images analysed to ascertain the materials' CT number and appearance in the images. It was found that some AM materials have CT numbers very similar to human tissues, FDM, SLA and SLS produce samples that appear uniform on CT images and that 3D printed materials show a variation in internal structure.
Copyright © 2010 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21239209     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  7 in total

1.  Simulating Tissues with 3D-Printed and Castable Materials.

Authors:  Michael O'Reilly; Michael Hoff; Seth D Friedman; James F X Jones; Nathan M Cross
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  3D-printed bolus improves dose distribution for veterinary patients treated with photon beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Tiffany Wormhoudt Martin; Mary-Keara Boss; Susan M LaRue; Del Leary
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed porous samples for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Arghavan Farzadi; Mehran Solati-Hashjin; Mitra Asadi-Eydivand; Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D-printed trabecular bone microstructure.

Authors:  Morteza Amini; Andreas Reisinger; Dieter H Pahr
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Classification of X-Ray Attenuation Properties of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Materials Using Computed Tomography From 70 to 140 kVp.

Authors:  Xiangjie Ma; Martin Buschmann; Ewald Unger; Peter Homolka
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-29

6.  Study of mandible reconstruction using a fibula flap with application of additive manufacturing technology.

Authors:  Ming-June Tsai; Ching-Tsai Wu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 7.  Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Valeria Filippou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.