Literature DB >> 29452866

Intrapatient study comparing 3D printed bolus versus standard vinyl gel sheet bolus for postmastectomy chest wall radiation therapy.

James L Robar1, Kathryn Moran2, James Allan2, James Clancey2, Tami Joseph2, Krista Chytyk-Praznik3, R Lee MacDonald4, John Lincoln4, Parisa Sadeghi4, Robert Rutledge5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This patient study evaluated the use of 3-dimensional (3D) printed bolus for chest wall radiation therapy compared with standard sheet bolus with regard to accuracy of fit, surface dose measured in vivo, and efficiency of patient setup. By alternating bolus type over the course of therapy, each patient served as her own control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 16 patients undergoing chest wall radiation therapy, a custom 5.0 mm thick bolus was designed based on the treatment planning computed tomography scan and 3D printed using polylactic acid. Cone beam computed tomography scanning was used to image and quantify the accuracy of fit of the 2 bolus types with regard to air gaps between the bolus and skin. As a quality assurance measure for the 3D printed bolus, optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry provided in vivo comparison of surface dose at 7 points on the chest wall. Durations of patient setup and image guidance were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: In 13 of 16 patients, the bolus was printed without user intervention, and the median print time was 12.6 hours. The accuracy of fit of the bolus to the chest wall was improved significantly relative to standard sheet bolus, with the frequency of air gaps 5 mm or greater reduced from 30% to 13% (P < .001) and maximum air gap dimension diminished from 0.5 ± 0.3 to 0.3 ± 0.3 mm on average. Surface dose was within 3% for both standard sheet and 3D printed bolus. On average, the use of 3D printed bolus reduced the setup time from 104 to 76 seconds.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates 3D printed bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy improves fit of the bolus and reduces patient setup time marginally compared with standard vinyl gel sheet bolus. The time savings on patient setup must be weighed against the considerable time needed for the 3D printing process.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29452866     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  13 in total

1.  3D printed integrated bolus/headrest for radiation therapy for malignancies involving the posterior scalp and neck.

Authors:  Eric J Hsu; David Parsons; Tsuicheng Chiu; Andrew R Godley; David J Sher; Dat T Vo
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-07-18

2.  3D-printed bolus improves dose distribution for veterinary patients treated with photon beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Tiffany Wormhoudt Martin; Mary-Keara Boss; Susan M LaRue; Del Leary
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  A three-dimensional printed customized bolus: adapting to the shape of the outer ear.

Authors:  Gorka Gomez; Montserrat Baeza; Juan Carlos Mateos; Jose Antonio Rivas; Florencio Javier Luis Simon; Diego Mesta Ortega; María de Los Ángeles Flores Carrión; Eleonor Rivin Del Campo; Tomas Gómez-Cía; Jose Luis Lopez Guerra
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-04-14

4.  A modern mold room: Meshing 3D surface scanning, digital design, and 3D printing with bolus fabrication.

Authors:  David Kiyoshi Sasaki; Philip McGeachy; Jorge E Alpuche Aviles; Boyd McCurdy; Rashmi Koul; Arbind Dubey
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Three-dimensional printing in radiation oncology: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael K Rooney; David M Rosenberg; Steve Braunstein; Adam Cunha; Antonio L Damato; Eric Ehler; Todd Pawlicki; James Robar; Ken Tatebe; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Ninjaflex vs Superflab: A comparison of dosimetric properties, conformity to the skin surface, Planning Target Volume coverage and positional reproducibility for external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Fiona M Robertson; Megan B Couper; Margaret Kinniburgh; Zoe Monteith; Gareth Hill; Sanka Andiappa Pillai; Douglas J A Adamson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  A clinical trial to compare a 3D-printed bolus with a conventional bolus with the aim of reducing cardiopulmonary exposure in postmastectomy patients with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Yuling Huang; Shenggou Ding; Jinghui Liang; Jie Kuang; Qingfeng Mao; Weiliang Ying; Yuxian Shu; Jingao Li; Chunling Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Quantifying and Assessing the Dosimetric Impact of Changing Gas Volumes Throughout the Course of VMAT Radiation Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Tumors.

Authors:  Joshua Scott; Kylie Dundas; Yolanda Surjan; Odette King; Sankar Arumugam; Shrikant Deshpande; Mark Udovitch; Mark Lee
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-01-17

9.  Improving 3D-printing of megavoltage X-rays radiotherapy bolus with surface-scanner.

Authors:  Giovanna Dipasquale; Alexis Poirier; Yannick Sprunger; Johannes Wilhelmus Edmond Uiterwijk; Raymond Miralbell
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Three-Dimensionally-Precise Breast Conformal Device for IMRT in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Breast-Conserving Surgery-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Chunbo He; Shilin Zhang; Lei Shi
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.