Literature DB >> 32675735

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of High-Fidelity Simulation in Obstetric Ultrasound.

Brian P Dromey1, Donald M Peebles, Danail V Stoyanov.   

Abstract

SUMMARY STATEMENT: There is little global consensus on how to train, assess, and evaluate skills in obstetric ultrasound. The outcomes of curricula, where present, are often based on the number of clinical cases completed, rather than objective outcomes. The central question in this review is whether simulation enhances training and prepares trainees for clinical practice. A systematic review was conducted of the currently available literature in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies considering the use of simulators in training or assessment of sonographers were eligible for inclusion. We conclude that simulation is best used for acquisition of technical skills and image optimization. Best outcomes are observed when simulation augments traditional learning, with a strong focus on specific, objective, and measurable skills. Integrating simulation into training curricula could allow trainees to contribute to clinical service while learning. How skills learned in a simulated environment translate to the clinic is poorly addressed by the literature.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32675735      PMCID: PMC7850585          DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   2.690


  23 in total

1.  Intra- and interoperator repeatability of the nuchal translucency measurement.

Authors:  E Pajkrt; B W Mol; K Boer; A P Drogtrop; P M Bossuyt; C M Bilardo
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Ultrasound simulators: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative review of other training systems.

Authors:  H Maul; A Scharf; P Baier; M Wüstemann; H H Günter; G Gebauer; C Sohn
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Basic European ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology: where are we and where do we go from here?

Authors:  K A Salvesen; C Lees; B Tutschek
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Transfer from point-of-care Ultrasonography training to diagnostic performance on patients--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tobias Todsen; Morten Lind Jensen; Martin Grønnebæk Tolsgaard; Beth Härstedt Olsen; Birthe Merete Henriksen; Jens Georg Hillingsø; Lars Konge; Charlotte Ringsted
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions.

Authors:  Xiaoli Huang; Jimmy Lin; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  Association between funding and quality of published medical education research.

Authors:  Darcy A Reed; David A Cook; Thomas J Beckman; Rachel B Levine; David E Kern; Scott M Wright
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Improving students' ability to perform a standardized foetal biometry plane using ultrasound simulators.

Authors:  M Le Lous; V Tsatsaris; A Tesnière; G Grangé
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-13

8.  Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert Suurmond; Henk van Rhee; Tony Hak
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.273

9.  Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.

Authors:  Juan Ruano; Francisco Gómez-García; Jesús Gay-Mimbrera; Macarena Aguilar-Luque; José Luis Fernández-Rueda; Jesús Fernández-Chaichio; Patricia Alcalde-Mellado; Pedro J Carmona-Fernandez; Juan Luis Sanz-Cabanillas; Isabel Viguera-Guerra; Francisco Franco-García; Manuel Cárdenas-Aranzana; José Luis Hernández Romero; Marcelino Gonzalez-Padilla; Beatriz Isla-Tejera; Antonio Velez Garcia-Nieto
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 10.  A mixed-reality surgical trainer with comprehensive sensing for fetal laser minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Allan Javaux; David Bouget; Caspar Gruijthuijsen; Danail Stoyanov; Tom Vercauteren; Sebastien Ourselin; Jan Deprest; Kathleen Denis; Emmanuel Vander Poorten
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.924

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Digital Education for Health Professionals: An Evidence Map, Conceptual Framework, and Research Agenda.

Authors:  Lorainne Tudor Car; Selina Poon; Bhone Myint Kyaw; David A Cook; Victoria Ward; Rifat Atun; Azeem Majeed; Jamie Johnston; Rianne M J J van der Kleij; Mariam Molokhia; Florian V Wangenheim; Martin Lupton; Niels Chavannes; Onyema Ajuebor; Charles G Prober; Josip Car
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 7.076

2.  Dimensionless squared jerk: An objective differential to assess experienced and novice probe movement in obstetric ultrasound.

Authors:  Brian P Dromey; Shahanaz Ahmed; Francisco Vasconcelos; Evangelos Mazomenos; Yada Kunpalin; Sebastien Ourselin; Jan Deprest; Anna L David; Danail Stoyanov; Donald M Peebles
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.242

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.