Literature DB >> 32673560

Testing the greater male variability phenomenon: male mountain chickadees exhibit larger variation in reversal learning performance compared with females.

Carrie L Branch1, Benjamin R Sonnenberg2, Angela M Pitera2, Lauren M Benedict2, Dovid Y Kozlovsky3, Eli S Bridge4, Vladimir V Pravosudov2.   

Abstract

The greater male variability phenomenon predicts that males exhibit larger ranges of variation in cognitive performance compared with females; however, support for this pattern has come exclusively from studies of humans and lacks mechanistic explanation. Furthermore, the vast majority of the literature assessing sex differences in cognition is based on studies of humans and a few other mammals. In order to elucidate the underpinnings of cognitive variation and the potential for fitness consequences, we must investigate sex differences in cognition in non-mammalian systems as well. Here, we assess the performance of male and female food-caching birds on a spatial learning and memory task and a reversal spatial task to address whether there are sex differences in mean cognitive performance or in the range of variation in performance. For both tasks, male and female mean performance was similar across four years of testing; however, males did exhibit a wider range of variation in performance on the reversal spatial task compared with females. The implications for mate choice and sexual selection of cognitive abilities are discussed and future directions are suggested to aid in the understanding of sex-related cognitive variation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  food-caching; greater male variability; reversal cognition; sex differences; spatial cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32673560      PMCID: PMC7423667          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

Review 1.  The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Sex differences in means and variability on the progressive matrices in university students: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul Irwing; Richard Lynn
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2005-11

Review 3.  The gender similarities hypothesis.

Authors:  Janet Shibley Hyde
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005-09

4.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  The new science of cognitive sex differences.

Authors:  David I Miller; Diane F Halpern
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Sex differences in spatial ability and activity in two vole species (Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus).

Authors:  S J Gaulin; R W FitzGerald; M S Wartell
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Smart is the new sexy: female mountain chickadees increase reproductive investment when mated to males with better spatial cognition.

Authors:  Carrie L Branch; Angela M Pitera; Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Eli S Bridge; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Differences in cue use and spatial memory in men and women.

Authors:  Catherine M Jones; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sex Differences in Spatial Memory in Brown-Headed Cowbirds: Males Outperform Females on a Touchscreen Task.

Authors:  Mélanie F Guigueno; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; David F Sherry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Coping with uncertainty: woodpecker finches (Cactospiza pallida) from an unpredictable habitat are more flexible than birds from a stable habitat.

Authors:  Sabine Tebbich; Irmgard Teschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Unique features of stimulus-based probabilistic reversal learning.

Authors:  Carl Harris; Claudia Aguirre; Saisriya Kolli; Kanak Das; Alicia Izquierdo; Alireza Soltani
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.154

2.  Testing the greater male variability phenomenon: male mountain chickadees exhibit larger variation in reversal learning performance compared with females.

Authors:  Carrie L Branch; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Angela M Pitera; Lauren M Benedict; Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Eli S Bridge; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Specialized spatial cognition is associated with reduced cognitive senescence in a food-caching bird.

Authors:  Virginia K Heinen; Angela M Pitera; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Lauren M Benedict; Carrie L Branch; Eli S Bridge; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Seasonal variation in reversal learning reveals greater female cognitive flexibility in African striped mice.

Authors:  Céline Rochais; Hoël Hotte; Neville Pillay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Neuroanatomical norms in the UK Biobank: The impact of allometric scaling, sex, and age.

Authors:  Camille Michèle Williams; Hugo Peyre; Roberto Toro; Franck Ramus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.