Literature DB >> 16248939

Sex differences in means and variability on the progressive matrices in university students: a meta-analysis.

Paul Irwing1, Richard Lynn.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis is presented of 22 studies of sex differences in university students of means and variances on the Progressive Matrices. The results disconfirm the frequent assertion that there is no sex difference in the mean but that males have greater variability. To the contrary, the results showed that males obtained a higher mean than females by between .22d and .33d, the equivalent of 3.3 and 5.0 IQ conventional points, respectively. In the 8 studies of the SPM for which standard deviations were available, females showed significantly greater variability (F(882,656) = 1.20, p < .02), whilst in the 10 studies of the APM there was no significant difference in variability (F(3344,5660) = 1.00, p > .05).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248939     DOI: 10.1348/000712605X53542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  17 in total

1.  Culture of science: strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology.

Authors:  Aaro Toomela
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2007-03

2.  Gender differences in working memory networks: a BrainMap meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashley C Hill; Angela R Laird; Jennifer L Robinson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Factor structure and sex differences on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence in China, Japan and United States.

Authors:  Jianghong Liu; Richard Lynn
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2011-08-01

4.  Are there Sex Differences in Confidence and Metacognitive Monitoring Accuracy for Everyday, Academic, and Psychometrically Measured Spatial Ability?

Authors:  Robert Ariel; Natalie A Lembeck; Scott Moffat; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2018-08-22

Review 5.  The impact of genetic research on our understanding of normal cognitive ageing: 1995 to 2009.

Authors:  Antony Payton
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Long-term effects of cannabis on eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Hanns-Jürgen Kunert; Ralph Radach
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Testing the greater male variability phenomenon: male mountain chickadees exhibit larger variation in reversal learning performance compared with females.

Authors:  Carrie L Branch; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Angela M Pitera; Lauren M Benedict; Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Eli S Bridge; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Why are (the best) women so good at chess? Participation rates and gender differences in intellectual domains.

Authors:  Merim Bilalić; Kieran Smallbone; Peter McLeod; Fernand Gobet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Whole brain size and general mental ability: a review.

Authors:  J Philippe Rushton; C Davison Ankney
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.292

10.  Genetic polymorphisms related to testosterone metabolism in intellectually gifted boys.

Authors:  Peter Celec; Denisa Tretinárová; Gabriel Minárik; Andrej Ficek; Tomáš Szemes; Silvia Lakatošová; Eva Schmidtová; Ján Turňa; Ľudevít Kádaši; Daniela Ostatníková
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.